top of page

By:

Quad Najmi and PTI

17 June 2026 at 5:11:32 pm

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met...

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met Speaker Om Birla informally on Wednesday, claiming the support of six of the party's nine MPs in the Lower House, sources said. Thursday's high-stakes meeting in Delhi will legally and physically define whether Uddhav Thackeray retains his parliamentary strength or faces another devastating party division, the third since Raj Thackeray split Shiv Sena in 2006. Sources in Sena (UBT) said the rival camp still doesn't have the support of six MPs. They claim two of the six rebels have reportedly changed their mind. In a swift counter-offensive to contain the damage, the party high command issued a mandatory three-line whip, summoning an emergency parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi on Thursday to force a physical showdown where the MPs will have to mark their presence physically. The developments triggered a day of high political drama in the national capital, marked by a furious, expletive-laden press conference by Raut, a reported counter-meeting by the rebel faction with Lok Sabha Speaker Birla, and sharp condemnation from the Congress. The internal fracture was visible at Sanjay Raut's press briefing, where only three other Lok Sabha MPs, Arvind Sawant, Anil Desai, and Rajabhau Waje, stood by him. The remaining six lawmakers were conspicuously absent; their exact whereabouts are unknown. The Sena (UBT) has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha, and at least two‑thirds of them would be required to form a separate group. Apart from Desai, Waje and Sawant, the other six MPs are Sanjay Patil, Sanjay Deshmukh, Omprakash Raje Nimbalkar, Bhausaheb Wakchaure, Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar and Sanjay Jadhav Not Reachable The six MPs stopped responding or became unavailable since Wednesday forenoon, after which the party stopped contacting them. They said when the party contacted Mumbai North East MP, Sanjay Dina Patil, he told party leaders that he was not with the rebel group. The party had asked them to submit a letter to the Lok Sabha Speaker, which he has not submitted so far. Later in the day, sources claimed that the group of six rebel lawmakers had privately met the Lok Sabha Speaker to claim a two-thirds majority in the Lower House, the precise threshold required to escape disqualification under the anti-defection law. Simultaneously, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who split the undivided Shiv Sena in 2022, was reportedly camping in Delhi to oversee the operational layout of the defection of MPs. He returned to his home town Thane in Wednesday night. He is reportedly studying all the legal aspects before taking a final call before the party’s foundation day on Friday. Speaker’s Role Following reports of the rebels' move, a loyalist delegation consisting of Raut, Sawant, and Desai rushed to meet Speaker Birla to file a formal representation urging him to reject any unlawful group alignment. Desai argued that the legal provisions are strictly on the side of the original organisational structure. "Under the law, a splinter group cannot simply merge with another party on its own, even if they have two-thirds support. Only the original administrative party holds that right," Desai told reporters, adding that the Speaker assured them he would thoroughly examine every legal aspect before rendering a decision. The widening panic inside the party also triggered a public, familial disconnect involving missing Hingoli MP Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar. While the MP remained unreachable, his son, Krushna Patil Ashtikar, the MVA's official candidate for Thursday's Maharashtra Legislative Council elections, released a video statement strongly defending Uddhav Thackeray. "I am a Shiv Sainik of Uddhav Thackeray. There is no room for doubt when it comes to me," the younger Ashtikar stated.

Electoral Roll: Why Updating Stops Once Nominations Close

Part 4: The process of updating the electoral roll is continuous, but once the last date for filing nomination papers passes, the list is frozen until the results are declared.

The process of updating the electoral roll is continuous. It is not directly linked to any single election.


However, once the Election Commission of India announces the programme for a Lok Sabha or State Assembly election, the last date for filing nomination papers is fixed. The electoral roll as it stands on that date becomes final for the upcoming election.


This means that only voters whose names are included in the roll on that day are eligible to cast their vote. After the nomination deadline, no further changes can be made to the electoral roll until counting is completed and results are declared.


The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court explained this principle in detail in the landmark case of Lakshmi Charan Sen vs. A.K.M. Hassan Uzman. The Court made it clear that while the roll is updated continuously, it remains frozen for the duration of the election process.


A related case was later brought before the Karnataka High Court and subsequently the Supreme Court, challenging changes made to the electoral roll after the nomination deadline. The judgements in this matter are also significant and must be understood.


Narendra Kheni v. Manikrao Patil

An election petition was filed in the Karnataka High Court challenging the elections to the Bidar Local Body Constituency for the Karnataka Legislative Council. These elections were held in May 1974.


The petitioners argued that some names had been added to the electoral roll after 3 pm on the last day for filing nominations. Under Section 23(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, no changes can be made to the electoral roll after the deadline for filing nominations until the election process is completed. This includes the addition of new names. In effect, the roll as it stands on the final day for nominations is treated as the definitive list of voters for that election.


In this case, the petitioners maintained that names were added to the roll after the cut-off time. Having reviewed the arguments and evidence presented by both sides, the Karnataka High Court ruled that the elections in the Bidar Local Body Constituency must be cancelled. The court found that including names in the roll after the deadline violated Section 23(3) of the Act.


Since these additions could potentially affect the election results, the court declared the process invalid and cancelled the elections. The Supreme Court later upheld the High Court’s decision.


The Central Election Commission has the authority to prepare the electoral roll for all constituencies. Guidelines on how and when these rolls should be updated are set out in Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The rolls must be revised before every Lok Sabha and Assembly election, as well as before by-elections. Once the deadline for filing nomination papers passes, no further changes can be made. The roll as it stands on that date is treated as final for that particular election. Additionally, Section 21(3) permits the Election Commission to conduct a special verification campaign for any constituency. The Commission also has the power to decide the procedure for such exercises. Using this provision, the Election Commission of India recently conducted a special verification campaign (SIR) in Bihar.


If the place of ordinary residence of a voter changes after his name is registered in the electoral roll, the Commission has the power to remove his name from the electoral roll of the relevant constituency under Section 22 of the same Act. If a person has passed away, the Commission has the power to remove their name from the electoral roll. However, before removing a person's name from the electoral roll, their side should be heard. This section also explains that no action should be taken unilaterally. That is, in any situation other than death, it is mandatory for the concerned officer to hear the person before removing his name from the electoral roll.


The provision for inclusion of name in the electoral roll is in Section 23 of the Representation of the People Act. If any voter wants to appeal in this regard, he or she can approach the District Collector or Additional District Collector. An appeal can also be made to the Chief Election Commissioner of the state against the decision of the District Collector. Provisions in this regard have been made in Section 24.


The discussion continues in Part 5.


(The writer is an author and a digital journalism teacher. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page