top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Thackerays’ ‘Taandav’ for trees, tigers

AI generated image Mumbai: Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) President Raj Thackeray launched a sharp attack on the government for the systematic degradation of the state’s environment under the garb of development, even as the climate change poses a direct threat to the environment, economy, agriculture, public health and the future of both rural and urban centres. Questioning the state government’s claims of having planted millions of trees, he rued how the World Environment Day has been...

Thackerays’ ‘Taandav’ for trees, tigers

AI generated image Mumbai: Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) President Raj Thackeray launched a sharp attack on the government for the systematic degradation of the state’s environment under the garb of development, even as the climate change poses a direct threat to the environment, economy, agriculture, public health and the future of both rural and urban centres. Questioning the state government’s claims of having planted millions of trees, he rued how the World Environment Day has been reduced to an annual ritual of tree-planting drives and clicking selfies for social media, though 90 pc of the saplings don’t survive even a day. “Only the government knows where those trees really are,” said Raj sternly. He recalled a "Blueprint of Maharashtra’s Development" he had proposed in 2015, in which he advocated how development without environmental sensitivity is hollow. Justifying, he said that the consequences are visible where roads, bridges and infrastructure projects are hailed as achievements, but even a short spell of rainfall can paralyze entire cities. Referring to recent reports on farmers returning from the fields after 10 am due to the scorching heat, Raj said that the worsening climate crisis has become an everyday reality. Citing official statistics, Raj claimed that extreme heat has caused productivity losses of nearly USD 159 billion and slashing of 160 billion work-hours annually in recent years. He mentioned the World Bank estimates that India’s GDP could plummet by 2.5-4.5 pc while 57 pc of the country’s districts sheltering 76 pc of the population stare at serious climate-related crises. Taking a swipe, he said while the governments boast about growth figures and economical rankings, they are silent on the staggering costs of environmental destruction. He questioned the development model “whether flooded cities, washed-away crops and unbearable summers” genuinely indicate progress. Claiming that Maharashtra was increasingly becoming unliveable for upto 8 months in a year, he said excessive monsoon rains disrupt rural life and urban floods cripple cities, while extreme heat make normal life a torture in summers in both urban-rural areas. Targeting the Centre, Raj alleged that nearly 173,984 hectares of forest lands were diverted in the past 11 years for mining and infrastructure projects to benefit the PM’s single favourite Adani Group. He said that these lands amount to 1,730 sqkm, or equivalent to the area of 16 Sanjay Gandhi National Park (SGNP) that is spread over barely 104 sqkm. Dissolve state wildlife board: Aaditya Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aditya Thackeray has accused the Maharashtra government for issuing a permit to carry out mining activity in the sensitive tiger corridor between the Tadoba-Andhari and Indravati sanctuaries housing the big striped cats. In a strongly-worded letter to the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) Member-Secretary Sanjay Kumar, Thackeray sought his immediate personal intervention, sacking the Maharashtra State Board for Wild-Life (SBWL), revoking the permit, and probe against the Chief Wildlife Warden & Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) M. Srinivasa Reddy for the alleged lacunae. Aditya’s two-pager says the permit has been granted for “scientific exploration and excavation/systematic recovery of low-grade iron ore in existing mines in villages Hedri, Bande, Parsalgondi and Round Parsalgondi, in the Etapalli taluka of Gadchiroli district”. Last January, Aditya – MLA from Worli – had first raised the issue saying that the proposed mine would create only 120 jobs, including 32 permanent, and the estimated output is pegged at 1.1 million tons in a year. Referring to two letters of Reddy – on April 28 and May 21 – the SS (UBT) leader claimed that in communications to the state government, the PCCF had changed his stance on the issue. Aditya said that in the first letter, Reddy had effectively opposed the government plans for mining activity but in the second letter, he took a somersault, ostensibly due to government pressures or some commercial interests, “the U-turn is disgraceful and detrimental to India’s national interest” – and this abrupt shift in stance must be investigated thoroughly. In view of the contrary stance of the PCCF Reddy, entrusted with protecting the wildlife but failing to defend the NTCA and NBWL, point to serious malfunctioning of the SBWL, and hence it must be dissolved, besides reviewing all its decisions in the past three years, particularly those pertaining to hazardous activities in sensitive areas, demanded Aditya. 444 tigers roam in 11,000 sq.km As per the Status of Tiger Report (2002), and the Maharashtra Economic Survey 2025-2026, the state boasts of 444 tigers prowling in the wild along with other menacing creatures. The state’s total protected wildlife network of 88 Notified Areas of National Parks, Sanctuaries, and Conservation Reserves - including 6 dedicated to the striped big cats – is spread over 11,092 sq. kms as per current data.

Influencers Under Pressure

Recent tragedies have renewed scrutiny of the pressures facing social-media influencers

AI generated image
AI generated image

Mumbai: On Thursday, a popular Instagram influencer Rohini Paradhye, 25, ended her life following uneasiness over some dispute. She was known as a reel star in her home town Solapur.

 

Rohini’s suicide shocked the social media influencers as her case was a repetition of a similar case that took place in Jalgaon two years ago. An influencer Vicky Patil had reportedly ended his life over family dispute.

 

These are not the isolated cases. In February, Reshma, a 24-year-old content creator known to her followers as Chinnu Pappu, was found dead in her rented apartment in Kerala. Together, the incidents have reignited concerns about the mental-health consequences of an economy built on visibility, validation and relentless public scrutiny.

 

Emotional Pressures

For many influencers, social media is not merely a platform but a livelihood. Yet the same medium that offers fame and financial rewards can also expose its stars to criticism on an industrial scale. Dr Anjali Chhabria, a psychiatrist and psychotherapist, argues that influencers face unique emotional pressures because their public image often becomes inseparable from their sense of self.

 

“Their engagement, relevance and visibility become closely tied to their identity,” she says. “There is immense pressure to constantly perform, remain visible, appear perfect and stay emotionally available online.”

 

That pressure is intensified by the architecture of social media itself. Algorithms reward attention, novelty and engagement. Audiences quickly move on. The result is a constant demand for fresh content and perpetual relevance.

 

Dr Kersi Chavda, former president of the Bombay Psychiatric Society, says the economics of influencing can make criticism especially painful. “If you have monetised what you are doing and depend on it for survival, negative reactions become a major issue,” he says.

 

The need to continually attract followers creates its own anxieties. “Nobody will follow you for a long time if you are boring,” Dr Chavda notes. Influencers are therefore compelled to keep reinventing themselves, often while confronting the uncertainty of public approval. Content that is expected to attract praise may instead provoke hostility, leaving creators questioning their worth.

 

Not everyone succumbs to the pressure. Pulkit Sharma, a radio jockey and content creator who has faced online mockery over his disability, says experience helped him develop resilience. “In the beginning it affects your mental health,” he says. “But slowly you develop a thick skin.”

 

Success, he adds, can provide a degree of insulation. “The moment you start achieving success, it doesn't affect that much. If you are true to yourself, others' opinions don't matter.”

 

Mental-health professionals, however, warn that resilience alone cannot solve a broader cultural problem. Dr Chhabria believes the growing number of such cases reflects a deeper emotional crisis embedded within digital culture. Influencers, she argues, live under a form of permanent observation. Their appearance, relationships, opinions and personal choices are continuously judged by strangers.

 

“People often see fame, glamour and popularity,” she says. “They do not always see the emotional burden that comes with living under constant public judgment.”

 

Pursuit of Validation

Another concern is the pursuit of validation. Dr Sheetal Gagrani, psychiatrist and founder of Brush of Hope, says many influencers become trapped in cycles of instant gratification driven by likes, comments and shares. Social-media algorithms, she notes, are designed to maximise engagement, sometimes encouraging emotional dependence on online approval.

 

Her prescription is simple: moderation. Detaching oneself from the screen and partaking in activities like exercise, gardening, painting or cooking can help people reconnect with identities that exist beyond metrics and algorithms.

Comments


bottom of page