top of page

By:

Sayli Gadakh

11 November 2025 at 2:53:14 pm

India's Balance Sheet and the Middle-Class Reality

A strong national balance sheet ultimately strengthens household balance sheets. On budget mornings, millions of middle-class families across India do the same mental math: Will income tax fall? Will daily life become cheaper? Can we save more this year? The Union Budget is often reduced to these immediate questions. But if we step back and read Budget 2026 the way a chartered accountant reads a balance sheet, a deeper story emerges—one about the country’s financial strength, future earning...

India's Balance Sheet and the Middle-Class Reality

A strong national balance sheet ultimately strengthens household balance sheets. On budget mornings, millions of middle-class families across India do the same mental math: Will income tax fall? Will daily life become cheaper? Can we save more this year? The Union Budget is often reduced to these immediate questions. But if we step back and read Budget 2026 the way a chartered accountant reads a balance sheet, a deeper story emerges—one about the country’s financial strength, future earning capacity, and the sustainability of its growth. National Financial Statement A company’s balance sheet shows what it owns, what it owes, what it earns, and how it invests. The Union Budget does the same for the nation. Capital expenditure on infrastructure, digital public platforms, manufacturing, the energy transition, and logistics forms the asset side of India’s balance sheet. These are not routine expenses; they are long-term investments meant to generate jobs, improve productivity, and attract private investment. When highways reduce travel time, freight corridors cut logistics costs, and digital systems make compliance seamless, the economic benefit eventually reaches the middle class — through better jobs, higher business efficiency, and a better quality of life. Debt Is a Concern — But Also a Tool The fiscal deficit and rising public debt often dominate headlines. But in finance, borrowing is not inherently negative. The real question is: is the money creating assets or merely funding consumption? Budget 2026 continues its emphasis on capital expenditure, signalling that debt is being used to build long-term economic capacity. It is the equivalent of taking a home loan to buy a house, not a personal loan to fund daily expenses. This distinction is critical for India’s financial credibility and for keeping inflation and interest rates under control — two factors that directly shape EMIs, savings, and household budgets. Structural Shift in Taxation Another significant trend is the move toward widening the tax base instead of raising tax rates. Technology-driven compliance, data integration, and simplified systems are making taxation more transparent and efficient. For honest taxpayers, this is a long-term positive. A wider base means the burden is more evenly distributed and the system becomes fairer. Spending: Consumption vs Wealth Creation In personal finance, we are advised to spend less on consumption and more on asset creation. Governments face the same challenge. Budget 2026 walks this tightrope by continuing welfare support while keeping a strong push toward infrastructure and economic expansion. This balance is essential. Welfare sustains the present; capital expenditure builds the future. What It Means for the Middle Class The impact may not always be immediate, but it is deeply structural. Likely Positives * Better infrastructure leading to lower logistics and travel costs * Increased formal job creation through manufacturing and services growth * More digital and simplified financial compliance * Greater long-term economic stability, supporting income growth Areas Where Costs May Rise * Consumption linked to luxury or non-essential goods * Sectors where import dependence remains high * Items affected by rationalisation of subsidies or duty restructuring The Real Benefit: Stability and Opportunity While headline tax relief may be limited, the larger gain for the middle class lies in macroeconomic stability. Controlled inflation, stable interest rates, higher capital formation, and sustained growth create an environment where salaries rise, businesses expand, and investments perform better. In other words, a strong national balance sheet ultimately strengthens household balance sheets. Credibility of the Numbers Matters In accounting, projections are only as good as the assumptions behind them. GDP growth estimates, revenue targets, and disinvestment numbers must be realistic. Fiscal discipline enhances India’s global credibility, attracts investment, and keeps borrowing costs in check. This directly affects home loan rates, education loan affordability, and returns on savings. Why This Budget Is About the Long Term Budget 2026 does not appear designed for short-term applause. Instead, it reflects a strategy focused on capacity creation, formalisation of the economy, and sustained growth. That may not deliver instant gratification, but it strengthens the foundation on which future income and employment will grow. The Final Balance For a chartered accountant, the principle is simple: financial health is not judged by one year’s profit but by the strength of the balance sheet. The same applies to a nation. Budget 2026 may not dramatically change monthly tax outflows for every salaried individual, but it aims to build an economy where incomes are more secure, opportunities are wider, and growth is sustainable. In the long run, that is the kind of balance sheet every middle-class household benefits from — even if the impact is not visible the very next morning. (The writer is a Chartered Accountant based in Thane. Views personal.)

Sacred Attire

Updated: Jan 30, 2025

The Siddhivinayak Temple Trust’s recent decision to implement a dress code prohibiting short skirts, torn jeans and other revealing attire is a necessary move to uphold the sanctity of religious spaces. Temples are spiritual spaces where devotees seek solace, offer prayers, and connect with the divine. Temples are not mere tourist attractions but sacred sanctuaries. The least that visitors can do is dress accordingly.


The Jagannath temple in Puri, Odisha, and the Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan have already implemented similar rules, reflecting a growing recognition that religious spaces require a modicum of decorum. In the case of Siddhivinayak, the temple attracts thousands of devotees daily, many of whom have expressed discomfort over attire that they feel clashes with the temple’s spiritual ambience.


Few would question the need for decorum in a courtroom, a government office, or even an upscale restaurant. Yet, when religious institutions enforce dress codes to preserve their sanctity, a chorus of indignation often rises in the name of personal freedom, with such ‘critics’ arguing that such rules reflect moral policing or an imposition of traditionalist values.

But this argument confuses religious sanctity with public space liberalism. No one is being compelled to enter the temple, and those who do should respect the customs that govern it. Even in non-Hindu religious spaces, dress codes are the norm. One does not enter a gurdwara without covering their head, nor a mosque or church dressed in attire deemed unsuitable for prayer. The sanctity of a religious institution should not be sacrificed at the altar of modern whims.


To dismiss this as an encroachment on personal liberties is to misunderstand the nature of such spaces. Religious sites operate under different expectations than public thoroughfares or commercial hubs. They are designed for reflection, devotion, and ritual. While Indian society has rightly evolved towards greater personal freedom in many spheres, faith-based institutions must be allowed to maintain traditions that are integral to their identity. The temple trust has made it clear that its goal is not to impose regressive restrictions but to ensure that all visitors feel comfortable and that the sanctity of the temple is upheld.


Moreover, the argument that religious sites must remain entirely open-ended in their dress codes simply does not hold water. Many of the people who object to these restrictions would scarcely question the need for appropriate attire at a formal event or while meeting a dignitary. The principle is the same -respect for the setting dictates the mode of dress. Those who seek to frame this as a battle between liberalism and conservatism fail to grasp that such measures are about propriety, not repression.


In an era where the lines between cultural expression and decorum are increasingly blurred, it is worth remembering that not every rule is an infringement on liberty. If people can abide by dress codes in secular spaces, they should extend the same courtesy to places of worship.

Comments

bottom of page