top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Mahayuti struggles with seat-sharing formula

Mumbai: The ruling Mahayuti alliance is currently navigating a treacherous political minefield. With the crucial Legislative Council elections rapidly approaching, deep-seated differences over seat-sharing have surfaced. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Monday offered a candid admission of these unresolved disputes. His statements underscore the immense pressure on the coalition partners. The state is preparing to vote for sixteen council seats and one bypoll seat in Nagpur. Voting is...

Mahayuti struggles with seat-sharing formula

Mumbai: The ruling Mahayuti alliance is currently navigating a treacherous political minefield. With the crucial Legislative Council elections rapidly approaching, deep-seated differences over seat-sharing have surfaced. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Monday offered a candid admission of these unresolved disputes. His statements underscore the immense pressure on the coalition partners. The state is preparing to vote for sixteen council seats and one bypoll seat in Nagpur. Voting is scheduled for June 18, with the all-important counting set for June 22. Addressing the media after inaugurating the Jawahar Balbhavan in Mumbai, Fadnavis sought to project a calm exterior. He emphasised that detailed discussions are still ongoing to evaluate various aspects of the electoral battle. He expressed confidence that the alliance would soon reach an amicable solution. However, the specific geographies he mentioned reveal the exact fault lines. Negotiations with the Shiv Sena are heavily concentrated on Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar and Nashik. Meanwhile, talks with the Nationalist Congress Party are focused squarely on Pune. Alliance Arithmatic The arithmetic of the alliance is proving incredibly difficult to balance. The Shiv Sena had firmly demanded seven seats even as the BJP was offering only 3. They justify this claim by pointing to their strong support bases in Mumbai, Thane, Raigad, Sambhajinagar, Ratnagiri, Nashik, and Yavatmal. The Bharatiya Janata Party has a vastly different calculation. The BJP plans to assert its dominance by contesting twelve seats. This aggressive stance would leave only three seats for the Sena and a mere two seats for the Sunetra Pawar-led NCP. With the nomination process already underway, the clock is ticking loudly for the Mahayuti leadership. This intense internal friction prompted a sudden political maneuver by Deputy Chief Minister and Shiv Sena chief Eknath Shinde. He flew to New Delhi over the weekend amid the escalating deadlock. Sena sources indicated that Shinde sought the intervention of the BJP’s central leadership. A Sena minister, however, quickly tried to downplay the optics of the trip. He insisted that Shinde travelled for an unscheduled programme before heading to Bengaluru for a planned event. Despite these official denials, the timing strongly suggests a high-stakes crisis intervention. Bitter Conflict The most bitter conflict within the alliance centers on the Thane local authorities constituency. Both the BJP and the Shinde-led Sena are fiercely staking their claims. A BJP legislator recently argued that political tickets should be distributed based strictly on numerical strength. He pointed out that the BJP commands 444 corporators in the region. In stark contrast, the Shinde-led Sena and the allied Jijau organisation possess a combined total of only 346 corporators. However, political reality in Maharashtra is rarely dictated by numbers alone. The Shinde faction views Thane as its emotional and traditional stronghold. Surrendering this territory to their alliance partner is considered politically unthinkable. This local dispute is already threatening to severely damage the broader coalition. A Sena Member of Parliament recently issued a stark warning regarding the upcoming Thane Zilla Parishad elections. He boldly asserted that Sena workers are fully prepared to fight alone and hoist their saffron flag, regardless of the alliance’s survival. The battle lines are extending further across the state map. The Sena is demanding the Jalgaon seat, which the BJP is equally determined to contest. Furthermore, reports suggest the Sena is preparing to unilaterally field a candidate in Raigad. This would further complicate the already delicate negotiations. Despite these mounting tensions, BJP minister Girish Mahajan has publicly maintained that the deadlock will be resolved shortly. A final decision now rests on an impending high-level meeting between Fadnavis, Shinde, and Sunetra Pawar. MVA Crisis Meanwhile, the political turbulence is not restricted to the Mahayuti alliance. The opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi is dealing with its own severe crisis in the Vidarbha region. The Chandrapur-Gadchiroli council seat has triggered frantic political poaching. As many as sixty corporators and Zilla Parishad members from the Congress party reportedly went missing recently. Congress leaders have directly accused BJP legislator Banti Bhangadiya of orchestrating this disappearance. They allege he has shifted the corporators to an undisclosed location to manipulate the voting outcome. The Congress has responded with an aggressive counter-narrative. Senior Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar made a startling claim that over one hundred BJP corporators are secretly in contact with him. While Wadettiwar strategically hid their exact whereabouts, his statement highlighted a critical vulnerability. He suggested that the BJP is also suffering from severe internal factionalism. Wadettiwar warned that these hidden rifts will ultimately cost the ruling party dearly in the forthcoming elections.

The Druze Divide

The collapse of Assad’s regime has thrown Syria’s delicate ethnic balance into turmoil, with the Druze once again caught in the crossfire.

The fall of Bashar al-Assad last year ended more than half a century of Alawite dominance in Syria. Yet peace has since proved elusive. In recent weeks, the southern province of Sweida has been engulfed in some of the worst communal violence since the Islamic-led government took power. At least 37 people have been killed in clashes between the Druze - members of a small, secretive religious minority - and Sunni Bedouin tribes following a spate of tit-for-tat kidnappings and armed ambushes. Over 100 have been injured. As the new authorities scramble to restore order, the events in Sweida reveal just how fragile post-Assad Syria remains, and how the fate of minorities like the Druze may shape its future.

 

The Druze are no strangers to political turbulence. Emerging in the 11th century as an offshoot of Ismaili Shiism, they have long maintained a tight-knit, secretive identity, with theological doctrines inaccessible to outsiders and a strong sense of communal autonomy. Though they make up less than 3 percent of Syria’s population, their geographic concentration in the rugged highlands of Sweida has enabled them to preserve a distinctive social and military structure.

 

Historically, the Druze have played a careful game of pragmatism by aligning with central regimes when convenient, yet always keeping one foot outside the state’s reach. That strategy reached its apogee under Bashar al-Assad. During Syria’s long civil war, the Druze largely refrained from joining the armed opposition, choosing instead to tacitly back the regime in exchange for security and limited autonomy. Assad, an Alawite himself - a sect closely aligned with Shiism - relied on such minority alliances to buttress his rule against a largely Sunni uprising.

 

In Sweida, this meant that government forces rarely intervened in local affairs. Druze militias had maintained checkpoints and enforced order. But the arrangement rested on Assad’s capacity to mediate between communities and to keep hardline Sunni groups at bay. With his fall, that balance has evaporated.

 

The current violence was sparked by a checkpoint set up by a Bedouin tribe, where a young Druze man was reportedly robbed and assaulted. This led to a wave of retaliatory kidnappings and armed confrontations. In April and May, skirmishes between Druze fighters and the new security forces had already left dozens dead.

 

The Islamic-led government, formed after the Islamist rebel group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) stormed Damascus last year, is attempting to project control. But its legitimacy remains contested, particularly among minority groups who fear that the new Sunni-dominated order may prove no more inclusive than the one it replaced. HTS, once a pariah on Western terrorism lists, has been cautiously rehabilitated with Donald Trump recently removing it from its list of foreign terrorist organisations.

 

These moves suggest a realpolitik-driven recalibration in Western policy. But on the ground, minorities remain vulnerable.

Beyond the Druze, other minority communities are facing similar threats. Hundreds of Alawites have reportedly been killed in recent months, and even Christian churches in Damascus have been attacked.

 

Syria’s past offers few reassuring precedents. In 1925, the Great Syrian Revolt, largely led by the Druze against French colonial rule, saw the community emerge as both a symbol of national resistance and a target of brutal suppression. During the Lebanese civil war (1975–1990), Druze militias played pivotal roles in sectarian battles, carving out autonomous zones and sometimes turning against former allies. In Israel, the Druze have often been treated as ‘loyal Arabs,’ serving in the military but also resisting policies that marginalize Palestinians. This history underscores a fundamental truth: the Druze survive by adapting, but their loyalties are not immutable.

 

Today, the stakes are existential. Without the backing of a strong central state, the Druze face growing hostility from Sunni tribes emboldened by the new order. Unless the government in Damascus can offer real guarantees of protection and pluralism, the sectarian patchwork of southern Syria could unravel further.

 

Comments


bottom of page