top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

The Price of a Plot

A municipal scam in Vasai-Virar lays bare how India’s urban governance often serves builders and politicians better than its citizens.

As India marked its 79th Independence Day, the flutter of tricolours in the monsoon breeze masked a less uplifting sight of an officer of the elite Indian Administrative Service being led away in handcuffs. Anil Kumar Pawar, until recently Commissioner of the Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation (VVCMC), was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with a sprawling money-laundering and illegal construction racket.


His fall, far more than just another corruption story, is a parable about the rot in India’s municipal governance, the pliability of urban planning laws and the political patronage networks that enable them.


The ED alleges that under Pawar’s watch in 2022, no fewer than 41 residential and commercial buildings sprouted illegally on land meant for sewage treatment plants and dumping grounds. These were not shanties hastily assembled under tarpaulin, but concrete blocks sold to unsuspecting middle-class buyers. Many put their life savings into flats they believed carried proper approvals. Courts later deemed the buildings illegal, and demolition crews reduced them to rubble. The families were left with neither home nor hope.


Such projects, prosecutors say, were not the product of clerical oversight. They were the output of a ‘rate card’ system in which builders allegedly paid bribes of Rs. 20–50 per square foot for speedy, unimpeded clearances. The payments, channelled through a web of middlemen, architects and complicit municipal officials, were allegedly collected by Pawar and his deputy, Y. S. Reddy.


The trail of money, investigators claim, did not end at brown envelopes. Shell companies in the names of Pawar’s wife, daughters, and other relatives acted as laundering vehicles. Funds from ‘redevelopment projects’ - a favourite avenue for mingling illicit and legitimate earnings - were routed through these entities to give the cash a veneer of legality.


The paper trail was accompanied by a physical one. ED raids on a dozen premises tied to Pawar, including homes and offices in Mumbai, Nashik and Vasai-Virar, turned up Rs. 1.33 crore in cash and property documents allegedly linked to the scam. Earlier raids on Reddy’s Hyderabad residence had produced Rs. 8.6 crore in cash and gold and jewellery worth Rs. 23.2 crore.


When agents came knocking, Pawar reportedly refused to open his door for over two hours and tried to erase WhatsApp chats and call logs. The encrypted messages that survived  revealed code names: “D” for the Deputy Director of Town Planning, Reddy; “C” for the Commissioner (Pawar himself) who, the ED says, was the final collector.


The case might have stayed a bureaucratic scandal but for an inconvenient family tree. Pawar is a distant relative of Maharashtra’s School Education Minister, Dadaji Bhuse. That link was enough to set off a political dogfight. Sanjay Raut of the Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray faction) accused Bhuse of greasing Pawar’s appointment as Commissioner. Bhuse has admitted to the connection (his niece married into Pawar’s family) but insists he had no role in the posting. Political rivals seem unconvinced.


For the buyers who have lost homes, the political theatrics are cold comfort. In Vasai-Virar, as in much of India’s urban periphery, the promise of affordable housing is often tethered to the hazards of opaque approvals. Municipalities are meant to be custodians of the public interest; instead, they often resemble auction houses where zoning and safety norms are traded to the highest bidder.


The scandal also exposes the vulnerability of development-plan safeguards. The land that hosted these doomed buildings was officially reserved for sewage treatment and waste disposal—public-health essentials in a city of 1.3 million. Once those safeguards were bypassed, the city was left not only with dispossessed residents but also with diminished capacity to manage its waste and sewage in the future.


There is a cyclical logic to such scams. Political leaders lobby for pliant officials in municipal bodies. Those officials enable illegal projects, which in turn generate funds that grease political machines. By the time enforcement agencies arrive, the victims are too numerous and too cash-strapped to litigate effectively. Builders declare bankruptcy or vanish. Buyers cannot reclaim their investments.


Pawar’s arrest comes at a time when public confidence in local governance is already fragile. The Maharashtra government’s general administration department is now reviewing all major decisions he took as Commissioner. More heads could roll. Opposition parties are certain to keep the story alive in the Assembly, drawing attention to ministerial connections and the apparent ease with which checks and balances were sidestepped.


There are larger lessons. First, urban planning enforcement needs insulation from political interference. Without independent oversight, municipalities will remain fertile ground for such rackets. Second, buyers need better legal recourse. In countries with more mature housing markets, escrow systems or insurance guarantees protect purchasers if projects are later deemed illegal. In India, the burden falls almost entirely on the individual.


Finally, there is the question of deterrence. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, under which Pawar has been booked, is one of the country’s most stringent. Yet it is only as effective as its prosecutions.


For all the symbolism of Independence Day, the Vasai-Virar episode reminds citizens that freedom is more than the absence of colonial rule. It is also freedom from the petty tyrannies of local corruption, from the predations of well-connected middlemen, and from the bureaucratic collusion that can turn a dream home into a demolition site.


Who else, beyond the two arrested officers, benefited from this network? Why did internal auditors or planning committees fail to flag the illegal approvals? How many similar schemes tick away quietly in other municipal jurisdictions? Until these questions are answered, the scandal will remain more symptom than cure.


(The Writer is a communication professional. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page