top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

Man gets death for minor’s rape, murder

Mumbai | Nashik: A Nashik Special Fast Track Court has awarded the death sentence to a 25-year old man who was convicted last week for luring a 4-year-old girl with a chocolate, kidnapping, raping and murdering her, here on Friday. Terming the case as the ‘rarest of rare’ crimes, the Special Judge K. D. Paldewar – who had found Vijay Sanjay Khairnar guilty of kidnap, sexual assault and murdering the child on Sep. 30 but reserved the verdict after the final arguments on Oct. 7 – pronounced the...

Man gets death for minor’s rape, murder

Mumbai | Nashik: A Nashik Special Fast Track Court has awarded the death sentence to a 25-year old man who was convicted last week for luring a 4-year-old girl with a chocolate, kidnapping, raping and murdering her, here on Friday. Terming the case as the ‘rarest of rare’ crimes, the Special Judge K. D. Paldewar – who had found Vijay Sanjay Khairnar guilty of kidnap, sexual assault and murdering the child on Sep. 30 but reserved the verdict after the final arguments on Oct. 7 – pronounced the capital punishment today. He also slapped a fine of Rs 10 lakhs as compensation to the victim’s family, hailing from Dongrale village before a packed courtroom where the villagers, the victim’s family and others were present. Emerging from the courtroom after the verdict, Special Public Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam told the media that “the Court had considered the gravity of the crime and the circumstantial evidence establishing Khairnar’s involvement” while deciding the sentence. The Court did not take into account the convict’s poverty – he was a daily wager – or illiteracy as grounds for leniency, added the ace criminal lawyer. It was on Nov. 16, 2025 in Dongrale village of Malegaon taluka when Khairnar lured the little girl on the promise of giving her a chocolate and took her to a desolate spot to carry out his devious plans. Betraying the trust of the child who used to call him ‘dada’ (elder brother) due to their acquaintance, Khairnar sexually assaulted her, killed her and abandoned her before decamping from there. A few hours later, the child’s body was found dumped in a nullah and the police were summoned. As details of the gruesome crime tumbled out and spread, it ignited widespread public outrage all over the state. The police swung into action, formed several probe teams and managed to track down Khairnar from his hideout within a few hours. Considering the sensitivity of the crime, the strong emotions plus the mass furore it created, the state government assigned the case to a fast-track court, assigned Nikam as the SPP and the matter was heard speedily. The SPP aggressively led the prosecution, arguing in the court that in view of the gravity of the crime, the circumstances leading to it and other aspects, it warranted the severest punishment – death – for Khairnar, irrespective of his age or financial status. The Dongrale villagers stood in solidarity with the victim’s family and they raised a chorus for quick investigations, an expeditious trial and slapping the death penalty on the convict to serve as a strong deterrent to potential offenders. As per the Indian law, the trial court’s verdict will now go to the Bombay High Court for confirmation. Political leaders from different parties hailed the court verdict and said “justice has finally been done to the victim’s family”.

Biomedical Waste: From Neglect to Regulation

Jun 6, 2025
2 min read

The rise of HIV/AIDS and the 'Syringe Tide' of 1987 paved the way for global recognition of the biohazard threat and the need for regulation.

In the early days of healthcare, little attention was paid to the proper disposal of medical waste. Infectious materials, sharps, and other hazardous waste were often mixed with general waste, posing significant risks to both healthcare workers and the environment. The lack of awareness and regulations led to sporadic and unsafe practices.


However, during the 1980s, the rise of HIV/AIDS and other serious health concerns brought the issue into sharper focus. It is reported that, for the first time, the topic of medical waste management was discussed at a meeting convened by the World Health Organization’s regional office for Europe in Bergen, Norway, in 1983.


The ‘Syringe Tide’ episode of 1987, described in last week’s article, further heightened concerns. This incident underlined the urgent need for specialised medical waste management services and appropriate regulations.


In the United States, the Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988 categorised waste from hospitals as hazardous and required institutions to follow systematic guidelines for handling and disposal. As a result, a new industry of medical waste service providers emerged, offering comprehensive solutions for waste collection, transportation, treatment, and disposal.


The ‘Syringe Tide’ disaster also sent shockwaves across Europe and other Western countries. Eventually, stringent rules and regulations were introduced to govern the handling, transport from the source of generation, treatment, and disposal of medical waste.


Introduction of legislation for managing medical waste in India

In India, the first case of HIV was reported in 1986. At the time, there were no specific rules or regulations to manage medical waste. Due to the absence of legislation and a general lack of awareness among policymakers and other stakeholders, medical waste was not treated as hazardous. It was routinely mixed with general municipal solid waste and dumped in landfills or open dumping grounds.


To compound the growing burden of municipal and hospital waste, disposable plastic items were introduced into the healthcare sector in the 1970s. These items quickly gained popularity due to their convenience and durability. By the 1980s and 1990s, the use of disposable plastic items in hospitals had significantly increased, driven by the broader adoption of plastics in both daily life and medical practice.


The wake-up call: Dr B.L. Wadhera vs Union of India

In the 1990s, several NGOs and individuals in Delhi began drawing attention to the issue of unregulated medical waste management. In 1995, Dr B.L. Wadhera filed a writ petition in the Hon. Supreme Court of India, highlighting the neglected problem of medical waste disposal in Delhi. The petition pointed out that the government had failed to recognise the hazardous impact of openly dumped medical waste on public health and had not classified it appropriately as hazardous waste.


As a result, the Hon. Supreme Court directed the Government of India to appoint a committee of experts and develop a clear legislative framework for the classification and proper management of medical waste. This landmark judgement exposed major regulatory gaps and set the wheels in motion for the creation of medical waste management legislation in India. More on this in my next article. Till then, have a good weekend!


(The writer is an environmentalist.)

Comments


bottom of page