top of page

By:

Quad Najmi and PTI

17 June 2026 at 5:11:32 pm

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met...

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met Speaker Om Birla informally on Wednesday, claiming the support of six of the party's nine MPs in the Lower House, sources said. Thursday's high-stakes meeting in Delhi will legally and physically define whether Uddhav Thackeray retains his parliamentary strength or faces another devastating party division, the third since Raj Thackeray split Shiv Sena in 2006. Sources in Sena (UBT) said the rival camp still doesn't have the support of six MPs. They claim two of the six rebels have reportedly changed their mind. In a swift counter-offensive to contain the damage, the party high command issued a mandatory three-line whip, summoning an emergency parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi on Thursday to force a physical showdown where the MPs will have to mark their presence physically. The developments triggered a day of high political drama in the national capital, marked by a furious, expletive-laden press conference by Raut, a reported counter-meeting by the rebel faction with Lok Sabha Speaker Birla, and sharp condemnation from the Congress. The internal fracture was visible at Sanjay Raut's press briefing, where only three other Lok Sabha MPs, Arvind Sawant, Anil Desai, and Rajabhau Waje, stood by him. The remaining six lawmakers were conspicuously absent; their exact whereabouts are unknown. The Sena (UBT) has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha, and at least two‑thirds of them would be required to form a separate group. Apart from Desai, Waje and Sawant, the other six MPs are Sanjay Patil, Sanjay Deshmukh, Omprakash Raje Nimbalkar, Bhausaheb Wakchaure, Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar and Sanjay Jadhav Not Reachable The six MPs stopped responding or became unavailable since Wednesday forenoon, after which the party stopped contacting them. They said when the party contacted Mumbai North East MP, Sanjay Dina Patil, he told party leaders that he was not with the rebel group. The party had asked them to submit a letter to the Lok Sabha Speaker, which he has not submitted so far. Later in the day, sources claimed that the group of six rebel lawmakers had privately met the Lok Sabha Speaker to claim a two-thirds majority in the Lower House, the precise threshold required to escape disqualification under the anti-defection law. Simultaneously, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who split the undivided Shiv Sena in 2022, was reportedly camping in Delhi to oversee the operational layout of the defection of MPs. He returned to his home town Thane in Wednesday night. He is reportedly studying all the legal aspects before taking a final call before the party’s foundation day on Friday. Speaker’s Role Following reports of the rebels' move, a loyalist delegation consisting of Raut, Sawant, and Desai rushed to meet Speaker Birla to file a formal representation urging him to reject any unlawful group alignment. Desai argued that the legal provisions are strictly on the side of the original organisational structure. "Under the law, a splinter group cannot simply merge with another party on its own, even if they have two-thirds support. Only the original administrative party holds that right," Desai told reporters, adding that the Speaker assured them he would thoroughly examine every legal aspect before rendering a decision. The widening panic inside the party also triggered a public, familial disconnect involving missing Hingoli MP Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar. While the MP remained unreachable, his son, Krushna Patil Ashtikar, the MVA's official candidate for Thursday's Maharashtra Legislative Council elections, released a video statement strongly defending Uddhav Thackeray. "I am a Shiv Sainik of Uddhav Thackeray. There is no room for doubt when it comes to me," the younger Ashtikar stated.

True Grit

The aftermath of Pahalgam has seen Jammu and Kashmir CM Omar Abdullah consistently rising above politics to speak for the soul of Kashmir.

Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu and Kashmir

In a region often engulfed by fogs of mistrust and communal division, it is rare to find a leader who speaks with moral clarity. It is rarer still to find one who manages to turn tragedy into an opportunity for reflection rather than recrimination. In the wake of the horrific April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, in which 26 people, mostly tourists, were slaughtered at a bucolic meadow in south Kashmir, Omar Abdullah, the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, has offered something that has long eluded the state: dignity in mourning and sobriety in leadership.


The bloodletting in Baisaran, where innocent visitors were gunned down in cold blood, triggered national grief. The retaliatory fury followed in form of Operation Sindoor, which struck nine terrorist installations across Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir. But Islamabad, too, answered with a grim barrage of cross-border shelling, missile strikes, and drone intrusions. In Poonch district alone, 20 civilians were killed, among them children like Zoya and Ayan Khan, twin siblings whose deaths underlined the senselessness of this escalation.


At a time when war drums beat loudly and politicians sniffed opportunism in blood, Omar Abdullah chose a quieter, nobler path. Touring bombed-out villages in Poonch and Surankote, condoling with families of the dead - Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims alike - Abdullah reminded the state and the country that the costs of war are borne not in Parliament or on primetime news but in tin-roofed homes near the Line of Control.


What set Abdullah apart was his refusal to use the moment to further his own political agenda. The statehood of Jammu and Kashmir, a cause his National Conference has championed vociferously since the Centre revoked Article 370 in 2019, was pointedly kept out of his speech to the Assembly. “Is my politics so cheap?” he asked. That rare restraint deserves acknowledgment.


In a moving address to the Assembly, Abdullah read out the names and home states of each of the 26 victims of the Pahalgam massacre. From Gujarat to Arunachal Pradesh, from Kerala to Kashmir, he painted a map of national grief. And yet, he was unafraid to confront uncomfortable truths: that while the nation rightfully mourned the Pahalgam dead, few seemed to spare tears for those killed in Pakistani shelling in Kashmir. In a polity increasingly deaf to nuance, this was an echo worth hearing.


Abdullah also issued a chilling warning: while Operation Sindoor might have yielded a tactical victory, the strategic cost was allowing Pakistan to once again internationalise the Kashmir issue. He reminded the country that security is not measured in body counts but in lives left unprotected.


He also struck a powerful blow against those who justify terrorism as resistance. “Those who did this claim they did it for us,” he said. “Did we ask for this? Did we say these 26 people should be sent back in coffins in our name?” His voice was not merely one of condemnation but one of exorcism, ridding the Valley of the false prophets who kill in its name.


Perhaps the most remarkable moment came not in the Assembly chamber, but outside it. Across towns and villages, from Kathua to Kupwara, people spontaneously came out in protest against terror, against its false logic, against those who seek to make Kashmir synonymous with violence. “Not in my name,” they said. This eruption of civic conscience is fragile, but it marks something rare: a spontaneous moral uprising in a state long exhausted by fear.


Omar Abdullah may not command armies, nor be in control of the Centre’s security apparatus for Kashmir. But in refusing to politicise grief, in centering victims rather than vendettas, he has done something arguably more valuable: he has offered real leadership. In the heart of a wounded Valley, that counts for much.

Comments


bottom of page