top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Gold and Grief

Updated: Jan 17, 2025

The Stilfontein mine horror lays bare the South African authorities’ heavy-handed approach to illegal mining.

 illegal mining.

The discovery of at least 78 bodies in a derelict gold mine near Stilfontein, South Africa, has unveiled a grim tableau of desperation, criminality and state failure. The tragedy is a brutal reminder of the country’s long, troubled history with illegal mining and the authorities’ fraught attempts to control it. The human toll of this latest crackdown underscores systemic failures that have turned abandoned mines into death traps for impoverished migrants and a battlefield for violent criminal networks.


Illegal mining in South Africa is neither a new phenomenon nor a minor one. Known locally as zama zamas—an isiZulu term meaning “to take a chance”—these miners burrow into abandoned shafts left behind by commercial operators, often at great personal risk. What drives them is a combination of economic despair and the slim promise of profit, as they scavenge for remnants of gold in the world’s largest gold-producing region. South Africa’s formal mining sector may have long since declined, but the abandoned infrastructure it left behind fuels an underground economy estimated to cost the nation over $3 billion annually.


The Stilfontein mine tragedy is exceptional not just in its scale but in the authorities’ handling of the situation. Reports of food and water supplies being deliberately cut off to force miners out paint a damning picture of state negligence. Civil society groups have condemned this approach as tantamount to sentencing the miners to a slow, excruciating death underground. The government, however, defends its actions, claiming it was combating criminality. Mining Minister Gwede Mantashe framed illegal mining as an attack on South Africa’s economy, predominantly perpetrated by foreign nationals—a narrative that has fuelled xenophobic tensions in the past.


The figures are sobering: over 216 survivors have been brought to the surface, many in dire physical condition, only to be promptly arrested. Hundreds more are feared to remain trapped up to two kilometers below ground, while more bodies are expected to be recovered in the coming days. The death toll, already among the worst in recent memory, is a stark indictment of the government’s failure to manage abandoned mines or provide economic alternatives for vulnerable populations.


South Africa’s authorities have long struggled to curb illegal mining. The country is home to around 6,000 abandoned mines, many of which have become hubs for criminal syndicates that exploit desperate workers. These gangs often arm and control zama zamas, turning once-profitable mines into zones of lawlessness. Instead of addressing the root causes of illegal mining—poverty, unemployment, and the state’s inability to rehabilitate disused mines—authorities have resorted to militarized policing and mass deportations.

The Stilfontein debacle also reveals a troubling disregard for human rights. A court order in December mandated the resumption of food and medical supplies for miners, but compliance was haphazard at best. Civil groups and unions decry the inhumane conditions, demanding accountability, yet systemic reform remains elusive.


The plight of the zama zamas also has an international dimension. Most miners at Stilfontein hailed from neighbouring Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and Lesotho—countries grappling with their own economic woes. This cross-border desperation highlights the region’s interconnected challenges, from migration and unemployment to the exploitation of resources.


Critics have called for more robust policies to rehabilitate abandoned mines, create safer employment opportunities and regulate artisanal mining. These measures would not only curtail illegal activity but also harness the latent potential of a vast informal workforce. Ghana, for instance, has experimented with licensing schemes for small-scale miners, yielding mixed but promising results. South Africa could take note, investing in inclusive solutions rather than punitive crackdowns.


The situation at Stilfontein serves as a microcosm of the larger malaise afflicting South Africa’s mining sector and governance. The tragedy lays bare the human cost of decades of mismanagement, inequality, and neglect. Without significant reform, the nation risks more such calamities, further eroding its moral and economic foundations.

Comments


bottom of page