GST 2.0: Modi’s Winning Stroke?

By simplifying GST, Modi hopes to shield India’s economy from Trump’s tariff tantrums and win fresh political dividends.

When Donald Trump slapped 50 percent tariffs on Indian exports, New Delhi responded with unusual patience. Unlike other trade partners, who rushed to negotiate, India decided to wait, rather than strike a hurried and lopsided deal. The cost is steep: exports worth an estimated $48 billion are at risk, with textiles, garments and furniture likely to be the hardest hit. Small factories and supply chains that power these industries will feel the pinch. But Narendra Modi’s government has a plan - not to outwit Trump in Washington, but to shore up demand at home.

At the centre of this strategy lies a bold new tax reform. In his Independence Day address, Modi announced what his aides are calling ‘GST 2.0.’ The reform aims to simplify the Goods and Services Tax (GST), India’s ambitious indirect tax regime launched in 2017, which replaced a patchwork of state-level levies. The current system, with its four slabs of 5 percent, 12 percent, 18 percent and 28 percent has long been criticised for its complexity. The new proposal pares this down to two main slabs: 5 percent on essentials and 18 percent on most goods and services. A higher 40 percent slab will remain for luxury items and so-called ‘sin’ goods, such as tobacco and online gaming.

Everyday essentials - from groceries and medicines to washing machines and televisions - would become cheaper. Farm equipment and bicycles, too, would see price cuts. Even services such as insurance and education would carry lighter tax burdens. The government is betting that these reductions will free up household spending, spur consumption and offset the blow from declining exports. Analysts forecast an additional Rs. 5.31 trillion in consumption, equivalent to 1.6 percent of GDP.

At a time when India is losing ground abroad, such a boost to domestic demand is no small consolation. Additional spending could generate as much as Rs. 52,000 crore ($6.3 billion) in fresh GST revenues in fiscal year 2026. This, officials argue, shows that tax reform is not merely about easing household budgets, but about building a self-reliant economy resilient to external shocks.

The politics of the reform are equally significant. Modi has framed GST 2.0 as part of his grand ‘Viksit Bharat 2047’ mission, an aspirational blueprint to make India a developed nation by its centenary of independence. In practice, it doubles as a hedge against the vagaries of global trade and the erratic impulses of Trump.

Yet this is not merely about economics. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), having fallen short of a parliamentary majority in the 2024 elections, depends on two fickle allies: Nitish Kumar’s Janata Dal (United) and Chandrababu Naidu’s Telugu Desam Party. Both have a history of defecting, sometimes to the Congress, sometimes to regional rivals. Were they to abandon the coalition, the Modi government could face midterm polls. In that scenario, a popular tax reform that makes household essentials cheaper would be a potent electoral weapon.

Opponents accuse Modi of using GST reform as a political shield. By cutting prices for consumers while painting Trump’s tariffs as foreign hostility, the government stands to win both economic and nationalist points. Critics also warn that slashing tax rates may strain state finances, which rely heavily on GST transfers from the centre. A two-slab system may be simpler, but the risk of revenue shortfalls looms large.

Even so, the government sees GST 2.0 as a masterstroke. In effect, what India loses abroad through tariffs it hopes to regain, at least partially, through domestic spending. The reform will not undo the pain of shuttered factories or lost export markets. But it signals a shift in mindset.

In the global economy, tariffs are no longer an anomaly but a recurring hazard. Trump’s unpredictability has reminded governments everywhere that trade policy can change overnight.

GST 2.0 is a political and economic hedge and perhaps the beginning of a more inward-looking growth strategy. Whether it succeeds depends on two factors. The first is execution. India’s initial GST rollout in 2017 was marred by technical glitches and compliance headaches. A poorly managed reform could again sap credibility. The second is politics. Should allies defect and trigger midterm polls, Modi will hope that cheaper groceries, medicines and school fees can translate into votes.

In a political climate where tariffs and trade wars are as much about symbolism as economics, Modi has chosen a path that doubles as both policy and politics.