top of page

By:

Divyaa Advaani 

2 November 2024 at 8:58:38 am

Your First Impression Is Delegated

A prospective partner called your office last week. You do not know his name. You were not told he called. The phone rang four times before it was answered, he was asked to repeat himself, and he was promised a callback that arrived two days later as a message with no greeting. He formed an opinion of you in under three minutes. You were not in the room, and you will never know that opinion existed. Most founders believe their personal brand begins when they walk into a meeting. It does not....

Your First Impression Is Delegated

A prospective partner called your office last week. You do not know his name. You were not told he called. The phone rang four times before it was answered, he was asked to repeat himself, and he was promised a callback that arrived two days later as a message with no greeting. He formed an opinion of you in under three minutes. You were not in the room, and you will never know that opinion existed. Most founders believe their personal brand begins when they walk into a meeting. It does not. It begins at the first point of contact, and in any business of real size, that point is almost never the founder. It is the assistant who manages your calendar. The sales executive who sends the first proposal. The person who handles your WhatsApp, the receptionist, the coordinator who confirms the meeting. These people speak for you every day, in your name, using your reputation, and most of them have never been told what that reputation is supposed to feel like. Many are loyal, hardworking and capable. That is not the issue. The issue is that nobody ever showed them what a first impression of this founder should feel like. Here is what a prospective client experiences. They do not separate you from your team. They cannot. To them, the speed of a reply is how seriously you take them. The tone of the first email is the tone of your leadership. A proposal with a spelling error, a late response, a careless "will check and let you know" becomes evidence about the person at the top. If this is how the organisation presents itself while trying to win my business, they reason, this is how it will treat me once I have signed. And they never tell you. They simply go quiet. The deal that stalls after a promising first call. The partner who becomes "busy". The client who chooses a competitor and offers a reason that has nothing to do with the real one. Across a year, that is every enquiry that stalled, every proposal left unanswered, every introduction that never became a meeting. This is a personal brand problem, not a staffing one. A founder can spend years refining how they present in a room and still lose the room before they enter it, because the impression was formed by someone else, in a conversation the founder was never part of and never heard about. The founders who avoid this are not the ones with the most polished staff. They are the ones who have made their brand legible to the people around them. Their team knows how the founder speaks, what the business stands for, what warmth looks like in a reply, how a delay should be explained and how a client should feel in the first thirty seconds. The team is not following a script. They are carrying a standard, because someone took the time to define it. When did you last experience your own business the way a stranger does? Not a test call arranged with your team's knowledge. A real one. Send a first enquiry from a number nobody recognises. Notice how long it takes to be answered, what the tone is, and whether you would want to do business with whoever replied. Then ask yourself honestly whether that person sounds like you, and whether you would be proud to be represented that way. If the answer is uncomfortable, it is worth acting on now. Every week of that experience is a week someone forms a verdict about you without your knowledge. Your personal brand is not only what you say. It is everything said on your behalf. If you have a suspicion about how your business is being experienced before you ever walk in, that suspicion deserves a direct, focused brand consultation, not a casual chat. Book yours here: https://www.calendly.com/divyaaadvaani/founder-brand-audit — Divyaa Advaani, Personal Branding Strategist (The author is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries. Views personal.)

The Rise of Rwanda: Quiet Power in a Shifting Africa

Writer: Sumant Vidwans
Sumant Vidwans
Jul 27, 2025
3 min read

In a continent where power is often loud and large, Rwanda’s quiet precision is quietly reshaping the rules.

In a continent where power is often measured by size, resources, or economic weight, Rwanda is an anomaly. Landlocked, sparsely populated, and still marked by the 1994 genocide, it has nonetheless emerged as one of Africa’s most strategic diplomatic actors. Under President Paul Kagame, Rwanda wields a “quiet power”—a ”calculated mix of subtle military assertiveness, diplomatic agility, and a modern image. Avoiding open confrontation, it expands its influence through precision, strategic deployments, and a reputation for efficiency. As African geopolitics quietly shifts, Rwanda’s rising role merits closer attention.


Rwanda’s diplomatic stance stems from its post-1994 transformation. The genocide against the Tutsi, which killed around 800,000 people, left the state shattered and society divided. Kagame, a former guerrilla leader and head of the Rwandan Patriotic Front, rose to power promising unity, security, and rebuilding.


Over the next two decades, Kagame’s government reshaped Rwanda’s global image. Once defined by tragedy, it became known for clean streets, efficient governance, and rapid growth. Donors praised its results-driven approach, while Rwanda branded itself a model of African success. Beneath this, however, lies a hard-edged statecraft, evident in its expanding global presence.


Military power abroad

Rwanda extends its influence through strategic military deployments and is now among Africa’s most active contributors to international peacekeeping, especially in conflict zones needing swift intervention.


It has shown rapid, targeted military capability in the Central African Republic (CAR) and Mozambique. In CAR, hundreds of Rwandan troops have helped defend Bangui and support the fragile government, some under UN command, others via bilateral deals—highlighting Kigali’s independent reach.


In Mozambique, Rwandan forces, deployed in 2021 at the government’s request, played a key role in reclaiming towns from insurgents in Cabo Delgado, succeeding where local troops had long struggled. In both missions, Rwandan troops have been praised for discipline, clarity, and superior equipment.


Rwanda’s interventions have earned it a reputation as a dependable security provider. Critics, however, argue these missions also serve their interests—securing resources, influence, and alliances. In the CAR, for instance, Rwanda is said to have gained mining concessions and pursued exiled opponents, all while maintaining an image of disciplined leadership. Unlike regional blocs that take months to act, Rwanda has shown speed and clarity, winning allies across Africa.


The diplomatic playbook

Military efficiency is only part of Rwanda’s strategy. It has also built soft power by hosting major events like the 2022 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting and positioning itself as a hub for pan-African dialogue.


Rwanda has cultivated diverse diplomatic ties. Its relationship with India has grown through cooperation in agriculture, education, and digital services. Links with Israel have strengthened, especially in security tech. Newer ties with Qatar and Turkey signal a pivot towards non-traditional partners.


Notably, Rwanda has deepened cooperation with Russia. Though this has raised concerns among Western allies, Kigali frames its partnerships as pragmatic, not ideological. In the CAR, Rwandan troops operate alongside Russian advisers, including those formerly linked to Wagner. This flexible approach lets Rwanda expand its reach without relying too heavily on the West.


Rwanda’s growing confidence has sparked diplomatic friction. In March 2025, it expelled several Belgian diplomats over criticism of its domestic politics, drawing Belgian rebuke but standing its ground. Its recent, controversial exit from the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) was framed as a response to the bloc’s politicisation by rival states.


These moves highlight Kagame’s readiness to defy regional norms and Western expectations. Though still a major aid recipient, Rwanda’s foreign policy increasingly reflects strategic autonomy—willing to partner where interests align but firmly resisting outside interference.


Rwanda’s assertive diplomacy faces criticism. Domestically, political space is tightly controlled. Opposition figures like Victoire Ingabire face legal hurdles, independent media is scarce, and dissent is often silenced.


Abroad, human rights groups accuse Rwanda of targeting exiled dissidents. While praised for peacekeeping, its alleged role in regional conflicts, especially in eastern Congo, draws scrutiny.


This dual image—a disciplined, development-driven state abroad and a repressive one at home—complicates Rwanda’s model-state narrative. Its diplomatic efficiency is seen by some as a sign of deeper authoritarianism.


Rwanda isn’t building an empire, but it is seeking influence. As Africa enters a multipolar era, Rwanda is helping reshape the rules. Whether its “quiet power” can endure remains to be seen. For now, the world watches with quiet suspicion.


(The writer is a foreign affairs expert.)

Comments

bottom of page