top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Slow Death For 50-Over Cricket

Mumbai: For decades, One-Day International (ODI) cricket occupied a unique space in the sport. Positioned between the endurance and tradition of Test cricket and the high-intensity spectacle of T20s, the 50-over format once represented the ideal balance of strategy, skill and entertainment. It produced some of the game’s most memorable moments, from India’s historic triumphs in the 1983 Cricket World Cup and the 2011 Cricket World Cup to countless dramatic run chases and record-breaking...

Slow Death For 50-Over Cricket

Mumbai: For decades, One-Day International (ODI) cricket occupied a unique space in the sport. Positioned between the endurance and tradition of Test cricket and the high-intensity spectacle of T20s, the 50-over format once represented the ideal balance of strategy, skill and entertainment. It produced some of the game’s most memorable moments, from India’s historic triumphs in the 1983 Cricket World Cup and the 2011 Cricket World Cup to countless dramatic run chases and record-breaking innings that shaped modern cricket. Yet, in recent years, a growing debate has begun to dominate cricketing circles: is ODI cricket slowly losing relevance? With fewer bilateral series being scheduled, the rapid rise of franchise-based T20 leagues and several prominent former players openly questioning the format’s future, the discussion has moved beyond speculation to become a structural concern for the sport. Shrinking Space One of the clearest indicators of ODI cricket’s declining prominence is the reduction in the number of matches played annually. Historically, bilateral tours frequently featured five-match ODI series that often served as the centrepiece of international tours. Today, that structure has largely reversed. Modern tours increasingly prioritise T20 matches, with ODI series often shortened to three games or removed entirely. Several factors have contributed to this shift. The explosive growth of franchise leagues such as the Indian Premier League and the Big Bash League has dramatically reshaped the sport’s financial and entertainment ecosystem Scheduling pressures have also been acknowledged by influential cricketing institutions. The T20 Revolution Perhaps the most significant disruptor to ODI cricket has been the rapid rise of T20 cricket. Since the inaugural 2007 ICC World Twenty20, the shortest international format has transformed cricket’s global appeal. T20 matches typically last about three hours, making them more accessible to modern audiences accustomed to faster-paced sports content. For broadcasters and sponsors, the format offers higher entertainment value and greater commercial potential. The shorter duration also allows for more games to be played within tight scheduling windows, increasing revenue opportunities. Former Players Sound the Alarm Several former cricketers have publicly expressed concern about the future of the 50-over format. Former India off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has been among the most vocal critics of the current structure. He recently suggested that ODI cricket may struggle to survive beyond the next decade. ‘I am not sure about the future of ODI after the 2027 World Cup. I feel it is going towards slow death,’ Ashwin remarked, pointing to the increasingly crowded cricket calendar. Similar concerns have been echoed by former England all-rounder Moeen Ali, who offered an even sharper assessment of the format’s current state. ‘The format has almost completely died out, apart from World Cups and Champions Trophy,’ Moeen said, arguing that certain rule changes -- particularly the introduction of two new balls and fielding restrictions -- have tilted the balance heavily in favour of batsmen, reducing the tactical complexity that once defined ODI cricket.’ Such remarks from experienced international players highlight the growing unease about where the format fits within cricket’s rapidly evolving ecosystem. Structural Challenges Facing the Format Beyond scheduling pressures, ODI cricket faces several structural issues that critics believe have diluted its appeal. One concern relates to the loss of tactical balance. Traditionally, ODI innings evolved through clearly defined phases -- cautious consolidation during the early overs, strategic accumulation through the middle overs and aggressive acceleration in the final stages. However, modern rule changes, such as the use of two new balls from each end, have significantly reduced reverse swing and made conditions more favourable for batting. Why the World Cup Still Matters Despite these challenges, one event continues to preserve the prestige of the format: the ODI World Cup. The tournament remains arguably the most historically significant competition in cricket.   Evolution Rather Than Extinction In practical terms, the complete disappearance of ODI cricket appears unlikely in the near future. The format still carries considerable commercial and historical value, particularly through global tournaments. What seems more probable is a gradual restructuring of the format’s role within international cricket. A Format at a Crossroads The debate surrounding ODI cricket reflects a broader transformation within the sport. As cricket adapts to changing audience preferences, commercial pressures and player workloads, maintaining equal prominence for all three formats has become increasingly difficult. While some former players warn that the 50-over format is heading towards a ‘slow death’, its legacy and the enduring prestige of the World Cup suggest that ODI cricket is more likely to evolve than disappear entirely. The real question facing the sport may not be whether ODI cricket will survive, but what role it will ultimately play in the future architecture of the game?

Bharat’s Jetson Cities, Light-years Away from Nature

Updated: Jan 20, 2025

Jetson Cities

One thing is for certain: our Bharatiya cities, the big metros and towns, are fast becoming like the ‘Jetson’ cities. For those who are unaware of Jetson cities, these were first shown in the famous Hanna-Barbera cartoon series, the Jetsons, set in the 2100s, where cities are air-tight glass globules tethered to the ground, and the only way to get in and out are the flying cars. Yes, we, the city-dwellers, aspire to tall skyscrapers, spectacular bridges, world-class tunnels, swooshing metro trains, and we are building Jetson-like flying cars. A few HD drone images here and there, during the day and at night and around twilight, and we are content that our cities have become the cynosure of our own eyes. We want our cities to be brightly lit, with neon signs, laser shows, and large billboard videos. We would then fulfil our inner desire to have a city on par with Tokyo, New York, and Shanghai.


Our buildings, designed for the next 30 years, are well air-conditioned, shielding occupants from a soupy dust bowl of brown smog, soot, particulate matter, and fine dust. It is said that most new home buyers invest at least 10% of their property’s price in enhancing the interiors, soundproofing their homes, using air purifiers and conditioners, and disconnecting from the outside world for that much-needed solace. Indeed, large builders promote their projects as close to nature amidst tranquillity. However, there is always another builder eager to get one plot of land ahead of yours to enjoy that nature. To be truthful, access to nature now comes at a premium - even the skies.


Let’s assume the working-age population is occupied in the leisure of our Jetson cities, but how many of their young school and college-going kids have seen the long arm of the Milky Way galaxy from their cities? How many have witnessed a comet zooming by? How many know about endemic plants with medicinal properties? When did they last see a chirping house sparrow? How many know that the nearest sewage drain was once a freshwater stream? When did they last find their suburban beach prettier than the resort beaches of Maldives?


The intent to ask these questions is simple: Bharat is currently at a crossroads. Pundits are enthusiastic about a cultural renaissance on the horizon. Corporate leaders, on the other hand, want us to invest hundreds of hours each week to pay our dues to the growth of the national GDP. But no one asks, if a cultural renaissance is to occur, who will generate the new understandings and insights of nature that arise typically during such a period of human advancement? No one is actually asking, for whom are we building the nation if there is no time for children, or worse, if there is no time or intent to have children. In the process of growing rich, we are about to become old. By 2047, 65% of the population under the age of 35 will grow beyond 35 all at once, and we’d have an enormous population in advanced ages with a tapering young population, a graph that looks like a banyan tree. Unfortunately, that young population will have no access to the knowledge that nature has to offer, neither flora and fauna nor the seas and the skies.


Our urbane lifestyles need tempering. Such tempering can occur only if we ensure the revival of natural sciences during this period of cultural renaissance and nation-building. Let’s not rely solely on the educational system. With Indian Knowledge Systems, constructive changes are underway, and academic curricula are poised to improve for the greater good. However, true knowledge arises only when parents and grandparents introduce children to nature. Genuine understanding also develops from extracurricular activities in schools and colleges that encourage kids to observe, journal, and act on their discoveries. On the positive side, our country’s forest cover is increasing, as announced by the government. However, efforts must be made to ensure that every school or college, whether in Mumbai, Vijayawada, Gorakhpur, Ratlam, Thrissur, Bhuj, Faridabad, Imphal, Manali, Cuttack, or Ajmer, guarantees that their students are well aware of the endemic nature of their surroundings and are regularly observing and recording data on whatever interests them. Let kids observe rivers and understand the volume of water that flows through them. Let children learn about the decline of house sparrows in their cities and what steps should be taken to revive their populations. Let them study the bees in their nearby groves and recognise the vital role these bees play in nature.


Of course, you need to learn AI, robotics, fintech, the next generation of management courses, and all the engineering bells and whistles. However, we must not leave the next generation with inadequate comprehension and skills for understanding nature. We must ensure that nature conservation is not merely lip service or a tool for politicised green activists. This can be achieved if natural sciences are given the respect they deserve at the school, undergraduate, and postgraduate levels.


Indeed, I am a plebeian, and you might feel that you, too, could write a rant about the plight of our urban lives. Urban development and municipal experts have many solutions to propose, but few are willing to take action. However, that is not the issue I wish to highlight. I aim to illustrate a much larger concern—that Indian city dwellers are disoriented and devoid of nature, lacking a guiding star to lead them toward a brighter future. Our cities of Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, Ahmedabad, Kolkata, and Chennai have taken on characteristics reminiscent of Jetson-like cities. We show little regard for the Nagar Devata, Gram Devata, and Van Devata, who have protected the cities, towns, and forests that once surrounded us. We wait for formal governance to clean up our beaches, rivers, and ponds without making sufficient efforts to prevent pollution in the first place.


For those striving to grasp spirituality not through the Puranas and Aadi-Granth but through new-age podcasts, I recommend watching Vinay Varanasi’s podcast on Bhagavan Vishnu’s Dashavatar. If it is clear that Bhagavan Vishnu does not tolerate disregard for Bhudevi or Mother Earth, why do we, the devotees of Bhagavan Vishnu, continue to pollute our Mother Earth—her air, soil, waters, and sounds? Or have we taken Elon Musk's words at face value, assuming our next destination is Mars after destroying Earth, only to ruin Mars later, even worse than its current clinically sterile state? If that is the case, then bear with me when I say this: these Jetson cities stand on precarious pillars of ego, victimhood, apathy, and consumerism, waiting to be toppled either by the true harbingers of order or by false prophets. Therefore, teach the next generations to observe nature, appreciate our coexistence with other species, and venerate the forces of nature. By doing so, we humans will be good, at least for the next thousand years. If not, prepare for a bleak future by the end of this century.


(The author is a Space and Emerging Technology Fellow at the Centre for Security, Strategy and Technology, Observer Research Foundation, Mumbai. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page