top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

The Wrestler Who Became a Metaphor

Dara Singh gave post-independence India more than victories in the ring; he gave it strength, spectacle and a new idiom.

There are few figures in India’s post-independence history whose fame defies category. Fewer still whose names have become adjectives. Dara Singh, wrestler, actor and parliamentarian, was one of them. For millions of Indians, especially those born before liberalisation, the words “Dara Singh” denoted much more than just a physically powerful man—it signified an ideal of strength. A child who lifted a heavy bag was often told, half in jest, “So, you think you’re Dara Singh?” There was no higher compliment.


July 12 marks the 13th death anniversary of this man who helped India feel powerful in body and in spirit. Born Deedar Singh Randhawa in 1928 in Dharmuchak, a village in Punjab’s Amritsar district, he was an archetype sculpted by circumstance: six feet three inches tall, weighing 130 kilograms with a 55-inch chest. A diet rich in ghee and milk, and a childhood spent in Punjab’s dusty ‘akharas’ prepared him for India’s ancient tradition of ‘pehlwani’ wrestling.


His friends shortened Deedar to Dara, a name that would travel far. In 1948, he went to Singapore to train under Gurnam Singh, a celebrated coach. Soon after, he emerged as the Champion of Malaysia by defeating Tarlok Singh. Titles accumulated rapidly. Rustom-e-Punjab in 1952. Rustom-e-Hind in 1954. The Commonwealth Championship in 1959, beating international opponents like George Gordienko, John da Silva, and the formidable Zbyszko. His crowning moment came in 1968, when he defeated the American Lou Thesz to become the World Champion, the Rustom-e-Zaman.


Perhaps no bout better encapsulates Dara Singh’s legend than the 1956 showdown in Bhathgaon near Delhi. His opponent was Emile Czaja, an Australian wrestler of Hungarian descent who fought under the stage name ‘King Kong.’ At over 200 kilograms, King Kong was as infamous for his girth as for his tongue, having insulted both Dara Singh and India. The match, attended by Soviet premier Nikolai Bulganin and Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, was theatre and diplomacy rolled into one. In the third round, Dara Singh hoisted the giant onto his shoulders, spun him mid-air and hurled him off the ring and into the crowd, as legend has it. It was the stuff of national myth. India, barely a decade into independence, had its first global strongman.


He retired from professional wrestling in 1983 with an unbeaten record of over 500 fights. His farewell match was inaugurated by Rajiv Gandhi. By then, Dara Singh was no longer just a sportsman but had become a cultural institution.


Wrestling, however, was only Act One. With his imposing frame, angular features and a peaches-and-cream complexion, a move to cinema was inevitable. From the 1950s through the 1970s, Dara Singh became the staple hero of action-packed mythologicals and costume dramas. His filmography included titles like ‘Sikandar-e-Azam,’ ‘Lootera’ and ‘Daku Mangal Singh.’ His pairing with Mumtaz in 16 films drew adoring crowds. At his peak, he charged Rs. 4 lakh per film—a fortune at the time, exceeded only by superstars like Rajesh Khanna.


His influence extended beyond the screen. He produced and directed films, including ‘Rustam’ and ‘Bhakti Mein Shakti’ and helped develop the Punjabi film industry. He even set up a recording studio in Mohali. In 1996, he was inducted into the Wrestling Observer Newsletter Hall of Fame. A decade later, the World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) recognised him too—an unusual honour for someone who never fought in their circuit.


His final screen appearance came in 2007, in Imtiaz Ali’s ‘Jab We Met.’ But perhaps his most beloved role remains that of the Monkey God Hanuman in Ramanand Sagar’s televised ‘Ramayan’ (1987). Sagar later said there was no need to audition anyone else as Hanuman could be played by no one but Dara Singh. Millions of Indians agreed.


Later in life, he turned to politics, serving as a nominated member of the Rajya Sabha from 2003 to 2009, representing the Bharatiya Janata Party. In an era of bellowing parliamentarians, he remained a soft-spoken elder statesman.


To speak of Dara Singh solely in terms of career milestones would be to miss his cultural impact. In the India of the 1950s and 1960s still wounded by Partition, poverty and self-doubt, he embodied confidence. In an era before gyms and protein shakes, his was the physique that launched a thousand dumbbells. Children drank milk not for calcium, but because their mothers told them Dara Singh drank buckets of it. That was reason enough.


He helped establish a uniquely Indian ideal of masculinity: gentle off the ring, righteous on it and invincible in the face of foreign challenge. The muscle mania of modern Bollywood—whether Salman Khan’s shirtless rage or Hrithik Roshan’s sculpted symmetry—can trace its roots to a man who lifted opponents, but rarely raised his voice. Even Dharmendra, no stranger to brawn himself, once called Dara Singh the “original muscleman of India.”

The India that Dara Singh helped inspire is no longer a nation in search of self-worth. But it remains a country that responds to physical prowess with reverence. Perhaps that is why his legend endures. In a nation crowded with short-lived stars and noisy influencers, Dara Singh’s silence, strength and stoic dignity still speak volumes.


(The author is a political commentator and a global affairs observer. Views personal)

Comments


bottom of page