top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde in Delhi, speculation in Mumbai

Mumbai: The political landscape of Maharashtra is currently witnessing a renewed surge of speculative ripples as whispers of a major leadership overhaul gain significant momentum. Prominent Shiv Sena ministers have begun to openly voice their aspirations regarding a potential restructuring at the highest echelons of the state government. At the heart of this unfolding political drama is the growing chorus demanding the elevation of the Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to the Union Cabinet,...

Shinde in Delhi, speculation in Mumbai

Mumbai: The political landscape of Maharashtra is currently witnessing a renewed surge of speculative ripples as whispers of a major leadership overhaul gain significant momentum. Prominent Shiv Sena ministers have begun to openly voice their aspirations regarding a potential restructuring at the highest echelons of the state government. At the heart of this unfolding political drama is the growing chorus demanding the elevation of the Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to the Union Cabinet, thereby clearing the path for his deputy Eknath Shinde to take over the reins as the next CM. This simmering speculation has been heavily fueled by Shinde’s strategic departure for New Delhi on Monday, where he is expected to camp for the next two days.The immediate catalyst was a bold statement made by Shiv Sena leader Bacchu Kadu, who publicly expressed his earnest desire to see Shinde occupy the CM’s chair once again. Kadu articulated that it is the honest and natural sentiment of every Shiv Sainik to want their own party leader at the helm of the state. He went a step further to explicitly suggest that Fadnavis should be promoted to the central government. However, this assertion was met with immediate resistance from the BJP. Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule was quick to issue a stern rebuttal, emphasising the stability of the ruling Mahayuti alliance. He stated that no individual possesses the authority to unilaterally decide that Fadnavis should be relocated to New Delhi. Despite the BJP's attempts to quell the rumors, the sentiment within the Shiv Sena camp remains palpable and vocal. Echoing Kadu's sentiments, Industries Minister Uday Samant weighed in on the controversy, acknowledging that while Kadu’s demand might be presented in a personal capacity, it reflects a deeply natural political instinct. Samant candidly admitted that he, too, shares the ambition of seeing Shinde elevated to the top post. Shinde’s two-day sojourn in the Capital is officially slated for attending the Shiv Sena's national executive meeting and a crucial joint meeting of the NDA scheduled for June 10. However, the timing and context of this trip are being heavily scrutinised in political circles.

My Stalingrad, My Reckoning

In 2018, gripped by a restless literary hunger for something that could match the philosophical depth and vast human canvas of Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace,’ I reached for Vasily Grossman’s monumental ‘Life and Fate.’


What I found was something bleaker, more shattering and more honest. Grossman’s magnum opus is not just the greatest novel of the Second World War but mirror held up to the soul, mine included.


That year, I had been struggling quietly with a myriad of personal and emotional crises. My body was failing in small ways. So was love. I turned to literature in search of something deep in its moral and emotional reach. Grossman gave me that and more. He offered no comfort, but he taught me acceptance.


Finished in 1960, ‘Life and Fate’ was (unsurprisingly) banned by Soviet censors. Mikhail Suslov, the Kremlin’s high priest of ideology, had the KGB raid Grossman’s apartment and seize everything pertaining to the book - carbon copies, draft manuscripts, typewriter ribbons. Suslov is reported to have told Grossman that his book could not be published for the next two hundred years! That a novel could so terrify the oppressive Soviet state reveals just how clearly Grossman’s truths cut through the fog of toxic ideological propaganda.


Historian Antony Beevor put it succinctly when he observed that Grossman was the first to draw an explicit moral equivalence between Nazism and Stalinism, the similarities between the gas chambers of Auschwitz and the interrogations of the Lubyanka. In both systems, the individual is ground down under the heel of totalitarianism.


Grossman also had that rarest of combinations: physical and moral courage. A nearsighted, middle-aged Ukrainian Jewish intellectual, Grossman embedded himself with Red Army troops at the front lines, from Stalingrad to Berlin. He never took notes during conversations with soldiers, fearing it would alienate them. Instead, he would sit quietly, listen deeply and write everything down by night. His work for Red Star, the Soviet army newspaper, stood out for its honesty. Soldiers trusted him. He was, they said, the only one telling the truth.


That truth is what pulses through ‘Life and Fate.’ Its sprawling canvas is set amid the backdrop of the brutal Nazi invasion of Soviet Russia. Around it unfurls a panorama of Soviet life under siege: from the Shaposhnikov family scattered across frontlines and rear to physicists in state laboratories walking a tightrope of ideology and survival to soldiers on the steppe and prisoners in gulags and Nazi death camps alike. The novel’s moral centre is Viktor Shtrum, a physicist and surrogate for Grossman himself, who bears witness to the suffocating compromises required to survive under Stalin. In an unbelievably grim moment of history, Grossman finds redemption in the smallest acts of decency - a woman sharing her bread in a death camp, a soldier refusing to denounce a comrade.


The book does not preach. It observes. And it does so with a Tolstoyan eye for the tragic contradictions of history. The title is no accident as ‘Life and Fate’ was intended as a 20th-century homage to ‘War and Peace.’ But where Tolstoy saw providence, Grossman saw absurdity and the deep loneliness of freedom.


For me, that was the revelation. The only victory Grossman offers is the capacity to endure. That acceptance, oddly, helped me come to terms with my own condition, to deal with the uncertainty of tomorrow and the fragility of relationships. As Grossman writes, “Human history is not the battle of good struggling to overcome evil. It is a battle fought by a great evil struggling to crush a small kernel of human kindness.”


That kernel, somehow, survives. So do we.


(The writer is a Technology VP in an investment bank.)

Comments


bottom of page