top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law...

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law within the framework of safeguarding India’s pluralistic and democratic character. The AIMPLB leaders said they are soliciting support of people, intellectuals, activists, social and religious organisations who value justice, democracy, peace and the Constitution, to strengthen constitutional supremacy, the rule of law, justice and equality, religious freedom, social harmony and national unity. Around 100 progressive Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals, activists, organisations and supporters have warned that what the AIMPLB presents as a defence of constitutional rights, religious freedom and Muslim identity "could deepen divisions, and may provide political ammunition to right-wing forces". The progressive have accused AIMPLB of selectively invoking Art. 25-30 of the Constitution related to Religious Freedom, while ignoring that these rights are explicitly subject to public order, morality, and health. Moreover, they conveniently bypass Articles 14 and 15, which guarantee equality before the law and prohibit sex or religion-based discrimination. “Following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections where civil society and opposition parties rallied under 'Save the Constitution', the AIMPLB's campaign inadvertently gave the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Sangh Parivar a platform to posture as defenders of constitutional norms. Ahead of crucial state assembly elections, this campaign reinforces false narratives and fuels propaganda that Indian Muslims reject the law of the land,” said the intellectuals. They pointed out how the so-called ‘God-given Shariat Law’ in India is nothing but man-made personal laws and ‘male interpreted patriarchal interpretations’, defended by the AIMPLB. In its September 2016 Supreme Court affidavit in the Triple Talaq case (Sayara Bano v/s. Union of India), the AIMPLB’s affidavit claimed divorce rights belong primarily to husbands because men allegedly possess ‘greater power of decision-making’ and ‘control emotions’. It even argued that without a quick separation option, a husband ‘may resort to illegal, criminal ways of murdering or burning her alive’ - a disturbing rationalization of domestic violence. Claiming these laws are divine, the AIMPLB admitted that “India is a patriarchal society, and therefore personal laws of all communities are aligned with the patriarchal notion...” The progressives countered that Muslim-majority nations globally including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tunisia and Morocco have codified and reformed personal laws to protect women's rights. “Millions of Muslims live in secular democratic nations with uniform family codes without putting ‘Islam in danger’. The Muslim community’s current legal predicament in India is the direct result of the AIMPLB and conservative leaders failing to proactively reform and codify Muslim Personal Law,” said the progressives sharply. They said that genuine family law reform must guarantee Muslim women equal rights regarding minimum marriage age, abolition of polygamy, mutual divorce, equal inheritance, child custody, adoption, and a ban on female genital mutilation and halala. While secular political parties rarely support the rights of Muslim women, the BJP and the Hindu Right wing do so with an obvious motive: ‘communal polarization’, said the progressives. “The sangh parivar sheds crocodile tears for Muslim women while ignoring relentless hate speech (Love Jihad, Land Jihad…) and hate crimes like mob lynching, bulldozing homes, demolishing mosques or economic boycotts, with chants of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to intimidate and strike fear. This accompanies state actions targeting Muslims: Waqf Amendment Act, draconian anti-conversion laws, and a weaponised SIR (Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls) to disenfranchise vast sections of the electorate,” they averred. The progressives have sought the active involvement of all enlightened forces, civil society organisations and secular political parties to ensure that the demand for a gender-just, religion-neutral Uniform Civil Code is rooted in equality and human rights, rather than weaponized for communal division. Among the signatories to the appeal are: Naseeruddin Shah, Amol Palekar, Zeenat Shaukat Ali, Anand Patwardhan, Sultan Shaheen, Teesta Setalvad, Ram Puniyani, Tushar Gandhi, Mallika Sarabhai, Ratna Pathak, Feroze Mithiborwala, Anita Cheria, Zakia Soman, Jyothi Yedulla, Noorjehan S. Niaz, Madhu Bhaduri, et al.

The Shrinking Age of Innocence

Jul 12, 2025
3 min read

India’s children are growing up too fast, and their parents are scrambling to keep pace.

In an age where four-year-olds shun ‘cute’ clothes for ‘smart’ ones and kindergarteners groove to Bollywood numbers that ooze seduction rather than innocence, childhood is no longer what it used to be. A quiet revolution is reshaping India’s family dynamics. It is playing out not in hushed drawing-room conversations but on school corridors, in WhatsApp chats and on TikTok feeds. Today, the vocabulary of adolescence is romantic attachment, jealousy, sexual curiosity.


This cultural shift was laid bare in a Mumbai school recently when two girls from the secondary section approached their principal, not about academics or bullying, but to settle a grievance over a romantic entanglement. One had accused the other of trying to steal her boyfriend. If it sounds like a subplot from a sleazy high school drama, the shocking part is that such scenarios are no longer rare nor restricted to older teenagers.


Medical professionals have noted the physiological shifts underpinning this trend. Puberty, especially among girls, is arriving earlier than before, sometimes as young as seven. This precocity, however, is not only biological. It is cultural as well. The access to smartphones, streaming content and social media platforms has catapulted children into a world of adult emotions and expectations long before their brains are developmentally ready to process them.


“The loss of innocence isn’t because children are suddenly different—it’s because the world around them has sped up,” says Dr. Sachi Pandya, a psychologist at NH SRCC Children’s Hospital. While today’s parents pride themselves on being ‘open-minded’ and ‘non-judgmental,’ Dr. Pandya cautions that openness alone is not enough. “We also have to be wise,” she says. “Adolescents are still in a phase of emotional and cognitive development. Their understanding of intimacy or heartbreak is still forming.”


Children today are not merely exploring romantic relationships earlier but are actively talking about them with teachers, counsellors and parents. Unlike previous generations where secrecy and guilt were the norm, today’s children are vocal. Schools report students initiating discussions about sexual orientation, emotional struggles and peer conflicts, sometimes even demanding mediation. This newfound transparency, in theory, should make parenting easier. Yet it also means parents must step into roles they are often unprepared for: as emotional first responders, sexual-health educators and moral philosophers.


The age of innocence is shrinking, but the burdens of early maturity are real. According to Asawari Abhyankar, a teacher at an international school in Mumbai, many students in Grade 5 already have boyfriends or girlfriends. “They’re in touch with their emotions. They’re expressive and articulate. Parents, too, are more accepting, sometimes out of fear, afraid their children may spiral into drastic action if their feelings are invalidated.”


Social media and the globalisation of youth culture have accelerated this change. Concepts like prom, once alien to Indian schooling, are now common in elite institutions. Fashion shows, graduation ceremonies for kindergarteners and curated Instagram profiles are all part of growing up.


There is a cost to all this. The emotional turbulence once confined to late adolescence is now engulfing younger children. Peer pressure to be in a relationship is intense. Not having a partner is seen as abnormal. Childhood friendships are reframed through the lens of dating, and heartbreak becomes an all-too-real experience for a ten-year-old. “At a very young age, relationships are more like peer pressure,” Abhyankar explains. “And they’re missing out on the fun part of growing up as friends.”


Parents, meanwhile, are caught between modern ideals and timeless instincts. Many are supportive, even progressive, yet anxious. The dreaded “we need to talk” conversation, once reserved for late teens, is now happening while the child is still in primary school. The impulse to delay the inevitable complications of adult life now collides with a world that refuses to wait.


What is emerging is a new parenting frontier. Offering unconditional support is necessary, but so too is setting boundaries that align with a child’s emotional maturity. Experts insist that this is not about suppressing curiosity or moralising love but about timing. Relationships that arrive too early without the emotional scaffolding to support them can do more harm than good.


As India modernises and its youth get younger in behaviour and bearing, the old milestones of growth – the first crush, first heartbreak, emotional independence - have shifted. What remains to be seen is whether parents, educators and society at large can recalibrate fast enough to offer both protection and guidance. After all, childhood once lost, is hard to recover.


Comments


bottom of page