top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

America First

Updated: Feb 10, 2025

Few American presidents have displayed Donald Trump’s unsentimental approach to foreign relations. His motto, “America First,” is not mere rhetoric but a governing principle, enforced without regard to sentimentality or friendships. The latest testament to this resolve was the unceremonious deportation of 104 Indian nationals, transported in shackles aboard a US military aircraft, sparking predictable outrage in India. The images of these hapless individuals, their limbs bound for a 40-hour flight, have ignited a political firestorm in Delhi, testing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s diplomatic finesse.


The opposition has seized on the episode to question Modi’s oft-repeated claim that India is a ‘Vishwaguru’ - a global leader worthy of respect. The scenes of Indian deportees, treated as hardened criminals, starkly contrast with the narrative of an ascendant India forging strong ties with the West. Modi, who has carefully cultivated an image of diplomatic prowess, finds himself in a quandary: to criticize Trump risks straining ties with a key strategic partner, yet silence only deepens domestic criticism.


India’s External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar, has attempted to quell the storm, arguing that the government’s response adheres to international norms. But this bureaucratic defence has failed to appease critics who are asking pointed questions on why Indian deportees were treated like dangerous criminals?


Yet, for all the indignation in India, Trump’s actions are neither surprising nor unprecedented. Immigration enforcement has been central to his political brand, and he has demonstrated a ruthless willingness to act against violators of American law, regardless of their country of origin. India, often a beneficiary of America’s goodwill, is no exception. Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration has spared no one - not even those from nations with whom he shares warm relations. The Indian deportees, who entered the US illegally via the perilous ‘dunki’ route through Latin America, were simply the latest casualties of his unyielding immigration policy.


That said, the methods employed by US authorities, however, do raise uncomfortable questions. Handcuffing and shackling individuals for an entire flight smacks of excessive force. Were these Indian deportees, many of whom were simply economic migrants, so great a threat that such restraints were necessary? The United States often touts its commitment to human rights and dignity. But its treatment of these deportees suggests a stark gap between principle and practice.


For Modi, this incident underscores the limitations of personal diplomacy. His rapport with Trump, evident in their joint rallies and mutual admiration, has not shielded India from Washington’s hard-nosed policies. Despite the grand spectacle of ‘Howdy Modi’ and ‘Namaste Trump,’ the US has shown that its national interest takes precedence over camaraderie. In that sense, the deportations are a reality check for India’s foreign policy establishment. Modi, despite the domestic backlash, may have little choice but to accept this as the cost of doing business with Washington.

Comments


bottom of page