top of page

By:

Divyaa Advaani 

2 November 2024 at 8:58:38 am

Your First Impression Is Delegated

A prospective partner called your office last week. You do not know his name. You were not told he called. The phone rang four times before it was answered, he was asked to repeat himself, and he was promised a callback that arrived two days later as a message with no greeting. He formed an opinion of you in under three minutes. You were not in the room, and you will never know that opinion existed. Most founders believe their personal brand begins when they walk into a meeting. It does not....

Your First Impression Is Delegated

A prospective partner called your office last week. You do not know his name. You were not told he called. The phone rang four times before it was answered, he was asked to repeat himself, and he was promised a callback that arrived two days later as a message with no greeting. He formed an opinion of you in under three minutes. You were not in the room, and you will never know that opinion existed. Most founders believe their personal brand begins when they walk into a meeting. It does not. It begins at the first point of contact, and in any business of real size, that point is almost never the founder. It is the assistant who manages your calendar. The sales executive who sends the first proposal. The person who handles your WhatsApp, the receptionist, the coordinator who confirms the meeting. These people speak for you every day, in your name, using your reputation, and most of them have never been told what that reputation is supposed to feel like. Many are loyal, hardworking and capable. That is not the issue. The issue is that nobody ever showed them what a first impression of this founder should feel like. Here is what a prospective client experiences. They do not separate you from your team. They cannot. To them, the speed of a reply is how seriously you take them. The tone of the first email is the tone of your leadership. A proposal with a spelling error, a late response, a careless "will check and let you know" becomes evidence about the person at the top. If this is how the organisation presents itself while trying to win my business, they reason, this is how it will treat me once I have signed. And they never tell you. They simply go quiet. The deal that stalls after a promising first call. The partner who becomes "busy". The client who chooses a competitor and offers a reason that has nothing to do with the real one. Across a year, that is every enquiry that stalled, every proposal left unanswered, every introduction that never became a meeting. This is a personal brand problem, not a staffing one. A founder can spend years refining how they present in a room and still lose the room before they enter it, because the impression was formed by someone else, in a conversation the founder was never part of and never heard about. The founders who avoid this are not the ones with the most polished staff. They are the ones who have made their brand legible to the people around them. Their team knows how the founder speaks, what the business stands for, what warmth looks like in a reply, how a delay should be explained and how a client should feel in the first thirty seconds. The team is not following a script. They are carrying a standard, because someone took the time to define it. When did you last experience your own business the way a stranger does? Not a test call arranged with your team's knowledge. A real one. Send a first enquiry from a number nobody recognises. Notice how long it takes to be answered, what the tone is, and whether you would want to do business with whoever replied. Then ask yourself honestly whether that person sounds like you, and whether you would be proud to be represented that way. If the answer is uncomfortable, it is worth acting on now. Every week of that experience is a week someone forms a verdict about you without your knowledge. Your personal brand is not only what you say. It is everything said on your behalf. If you have a suspicion about how your business is being experienced before you ever walk in, that suspicion deserves a direct, focused brand consultation, not a casual chat. Book yours here: https://www.calendly.com/divyaaadvaani/founder-brand-audit — Divyaa Advaani, Personal Branding Strategist (The author is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries. Views personal.)

Architect of Social, Economic and Human Justice

Apr 13
3 min read

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar is widely celebrated as the chief architect of the Indian Constitution. However, to confine his legacy solely within constitutional limits would be to overlook the vast depth of his intellectual brilliance and social contribution. He was not merely a legal luminary but a visionary nation-builder who believed that true democracy must be anchored not only in political rights, but equally in social equality and economic justice. At a time when many leaders were focused primarily on India’s political independence, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar stood apart-deeply committed to securing dignity, equality, and freedom for millions who had long been denied their basic human rights.


Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar’s life story is one of extraordinary perseverance and unwavering determination. During his academic journey at Columbia University and later at the London School of Economics, he endured severe financial hardships. Living on minimal sustenance and often going hungry, he nonetheless dedicated himself to rigorous study-spending up to eighteen hours a day immersed in learning. Even in such circumstances, he remained committed to his responsibilities, sending part of his limited funds back home to support his family.


His academic excellence earned widespread admiration. His mentor, Edwin R.A. Seligman, recognised his work on provincial finance as unparalleled in depth and insight. Years later, Nobel laureate Amartya Sen would acknowledge Ambedkar as a foundational influence on his own economic thought. What makes Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar’s journey truly remarkable is not merely the number of degrees he acquired, but the discipline and resilience he demonstrated. Without shortcuts or distractions, he completed a four-year academic program in just two years-a feat that reflects his exceptional focus and determination.


Water Policy

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar’s vision for water governance was both scientific and deeply humane. As Chairman of the Central Waterways, Irrigation and Navigation Commission, he advocated for a systematic and integrated approach to river valley development. Initiatives such as the Damodar Valley Project exemplified his forward-thinking vision of multi-purpose water management-supporting irrigation, generating hydroelectric power, and controlling floods simultaneously. Yet, his perspective on water extended far beyond infrastructure and economics. Through the historic Mahad Satyagraha, he transformed access to water into a matter of human dignity and civil rights. He firmly asserted that public water sources must be accessible to all, free from caste-based discrimination-thereby redefining water as not merely a resource, but a fundamental right essential to equality and self-respect.


An economist of global standing, Ambedkar combined intellectual rigor with a profound understanding of India’s socio-economic realities. In his seminal work, “The Problem of the Rupee,” he critically examined the instability of India’s monetary system and highlighted the urgent need for sound financial institutions and reforms. He advocated strongly for state-led industrialisation as a means to accelerate economic growth and reduce structural inequalities. His emphasis on land reforms aimed at equitable resource distribution, while his support for the public sector was intended to create opportunities for historically marginalised communities. Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar consistently emphasised that political democracy without economic democracy would remain incomplete and fragile. For him, the right to vote held little significance without the assurance of livelihood, dignity, and opportunity.


Women’s Rights

Dr. Ambedkar’s contribution to women’s empowerment remains one of the most progressive aspects of his reformist vision. At a time when patriarchal structures dominated Indian society, he sought to bring about transformative change through legal frameworks. The Hindu Code Bill, though controversial, was a landmark effort to secure women’s rights in matters of property, inheritance, and marriage. He firmly believed that the progress of any society must be measured by the progress of its women. Today, the increasing presence of women in education, governance, and professional spheres reflects the seeds of change he sowed-though the journey toward full equality continues.


As Labour Member of the Viceroy’s Executive Council,Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar introduced a series of landmark reforms that transformed India’s labour system. He was instrumental in establishing the 8-hour workday, advocating for minimum wages, maternity benefits, and the protection of workers’ rights through trade unions. For Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, labour was not merely a factor of production-it was a human force that deserved dignity, respect, and security. His policies laid the groundwork for a more humane and balanced industrial framework.


In an era marked by deep-rooted social inequality and untouchability, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar emerged as a fearless and uncompromising voice for the oppressed. He did not merely challenge injustice-he systematically dismantled its foundations through intellect, activism, and legislative reform. Despite immense personal hardships, he never allowed adversity to define or limit him. Instead, he transformed his struggles into a powerful force for collective empowerment and social transformation.


 (The writer is Principal of Podar International School, Ausa, Latur. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page