top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Assertive Statecraft

Updated: Oct 22, 2024

Unlike earlier Indian External Affairs Ministers who, by and large, favoured a more measured tone when dealing with restive neighbours and India’s adversaries, S. Jaishankar’s approach has been unapologetically firm. He sets himself apart from his predecessors with a style of diplomacy that is both assertive and unflinching. Whether dealing with Pakistan’s cross-border terrorism or China’s military provocations, Jaishankar’s diplomacy merges strategic patience with sharp critique - a style that contrasts sharply with more reconciliatory stances of yore.


Consider his recent remarks at the 23rd Meeting of the SCO Council of Heads of Government in Islamabad. Jaishankar did not mince words, emphasizing that terrorism and extremism, often sponsored by Pakistan, hinder the region’s trade and connectivity. While former ministers like S.M. Krishna or Pranab Mukherjee might have opted for more diplomatic phrasing, Jaishankar had no inhibitions in openly calling out the “three evils” - terrorism, extremism and separatism. His blunt message was that trade and cooperation cannot flourish amidst violence, and India will not compromise on this principle.


This hard-line stance shows that India’s foreign policy has come of age. Previous ministers often focused on backchannel diplomacy and confidence-building measures, hoping to bring Pakistan to the table. Jaishankar, however, has raised the stakes, making it clear that the onus lies entirely on Islamabad. He has effectively drawn a red line, signalling that India’s patience for half-hearted promises of peace has worn thin.


His handling of China has been no less firm. Since the 2020 Galwan clashes, relations between India and China have been frosty, with border standoffs straining ties. While earlier ministers like Jaswant Singh sought to expand diplomatic channels and avoid direct confrontation, Jaishankar’s bolder approach has been to reduce India’s cooperation with Beijing to a bare minimum. At the SCO Summit, he underscored the importance of territorial integrity and mutual respect - an implicit but clear jab at Chinese expansionist ambitions. His message was that until Beijing respects India’s sovereignty, meaningful cooperation is off the table.


His remarks on Canada, delivered in response to Canada’s mishandling of separatist elements celebrating the assassination of former Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi last year, demonstrate his willingness to confront far-flung Western powers. Jaishankar’s critique of Canadian PM Trudeau’s “vote bank politics” and the platform Canada has given to extremist Khalistan elements was a striking departure from the caution exercised by earlier ministers when dealing with Western democracies. Where former ministers might have chosen to tread lightly to preserve strategic partnerships, Jaishankar took a confrontational stand, calling out Canada’s complicity in nurturing forces that harm India’s unity. This approach underscores that India will no longer passively accept the actions of others, whether they be rooted in vote bank politics or geostrategic manoeuvring.

Comments


bottom of page