top of page

By:

Prasad Dixit

11 October 2024 at 1:09:23 am

The Human Advantage in an Artificial Age

As artificial intelligence grows smarter and more efficient, the real battle may not be about machines surpassing humanity but about whether humans squander the qualities that still set them apart. With the recent news of a Chinese robot beating the human record in a half- marathon, there is renewed debate on how AI could outsmart human beings. Many experts see it as yet another proof of impending disaster as AI takes over most of the jobs in the years to come. This is not the first time when...

The Human Advantage in an Artificial Age

As artificial intelligence grows smarter and more efficient, the real battle may not be about machines surpassing humanity but about whether humans squander the qualities that still set them apart. With the recent news of a Chinese robot beating the human record in a half- marathon, there is renewed debate on how AI could outsmart human beings. Many experts see it as yet another proof of impending disaster as AI takes over most of the jobs in the years to come. This is not the first time when human civilization is facing a technological revolution that has the potential to impact society and economy in a profound manner. There is, however, a crucial difference with AI driven revolution that is often missed out. The first industrial revolution happened because steam engines were invented and it led to mechanization of production. It was followed by discovery of electrical energy and technologies to harness it for mass production. Next wave of evolution was led by computerization and automation in practically all the fields covering both offices and industrial shop floors through mainframes, personal computers, and programmable logic controllers. While all these leaps in technologies are very different in terms of the specific underlying inventions, they all have one thing in common. They were all invented to do things that were humanly impossible to do. One steam engine or electric motor could do the work that perhaps hundreds of humans would never be able to accomplish even with their collective muscle power. Automation of the manufacturing assembly line would deliver speed and accuracy that human beings would never be able to achieve. Beyond Human Technological advances in Telecommunication, for that matter, have simply expanded the range of 'hearing' and 'seeing' far beyond what human vocal chords, ears, and eyes could manage to do on their own. Computers, at its core, are essentially doing the math and calculations at a speed and accuracy that the human brain can never achieve. To add to that, machines using all these innovations in technology would work tirelessly without any fatigue for a duration that human beings would never be able to match. Although AI is yet another highly potent technological innovation, it is not as straightforward as the previous ones. It can absorb and synthesize huge amounts of data that the human brain perhaps cannot do. Ability of AI to answer any question reasonably well using all the global knowledge made available to it, summarize enormous amount of data and text quickly, quickly draw a complex picture based on instructions given verbally, predict a trend, recognize and highlight a specific face in a fraction of a second from millions of faces, write code based on simple English instructions, are all examples where the speed and accuracy of underlying computation is delivering what human being cannot match. However, there are several areas where human beings are trying to improve AI so that it can, some day, match or exceed capability that human beings themselves already have. Examples of this include the ability of AI to completely replace a human driver safely in all situations, understand full context or an intent behind a statement, carry out complex and well-coordinated mechanical activity in response to various unpredictable situations, react appropriately by correctly assessing the emotions at play, integrate generated code appropriately in the existing larger systems landscape, and so on. In such cases, AI is not exhibiting any capability that is humanly impossible to match. On the contrary, AI is trying to catch up with what humans can do easily. In other words, in these areas, AI is trying to become what humans already are. This very aspect separates AI driven technology revolution from all the previous ones. Direct Competition It is often said that AI and humans will co-exist in the future, and people will need to change their ways of working. It is obvious that AI is also going to directly compete with humans in many sectors. Equipment with an embedded chip on-board do compete with humans even today. A case in point is household equipment such as ‘intelligent’ washing machines and dish-washers where robots to do vacuum cleaning and floor mopping do compete with humans offering these services. A human household help can perform these activities far better than what a machine can do. However, given an affordable choice, an increasing number of households prefer machines over human maid services for a reason. Human household help may not always be punctual, sincere, honest, and reliable. But machines are. Uncontrolled emotions, anger, frustration, laziness, indiscipline, absenteeism do affect humans - but not AI driven machines (at least till the time AI itself acquires emotions of its own, and becomes self-aware some day). This aspect of comparison between AI and humans is likely to become far more prominent and consequential as AI driven machines and robots become more and more intelligent and thereby start competing far more effectively with human capability in many spheres. Competition is said to bring about improvement. Just as AI improves itself through continuous learning to mimic human behaviour and actions, human workforce also needs to improve itself by avoiding behavioural issues and inefficiencies referred to above. Otherwise, humans would lose the natural advantage that they still enjoy over AI, and which is likely to continue even in the foreseeable future. Employers or consumers in the labour-intensive service sector will accept AI driven machines and robots with all its known limitations if it turns out to be a better net-net deal in comparison to services offered by humans. This specific aspect has tremendous significance for India. Many Countries from the developed world do not have a young population with reasonably good IQ in required numbers. India, on the other hand, has it in abundance. One could compare it with abundant availability of Thorium or Sunlight in India as compared to the Western world. Consequently, unlike many Countries in the world that have a Uranium centric approach towards nuclear energy, India's approach needs to be centered around Thorium. India's strategy related to renewable, non-conventional, green energy needs to be based on solar power. Indian Context Strategies for adopting AI in the Indian context need to be similarly tailored for the Indian context. India needs to adopt AI in the areas where it clearly has an advantage over humans in terms of speed, throughput, ease of use, accuracy, and efficiency. However, the use of AI needs to be judiciously controlled in areas where AI is trying to catch up with the capabilities of the human mind and body. Several labour-intensive services such as drivers, caregivers for the elderly people, parcel delivery, security guards, maintenance and repair of various equipment, are all examples in that category. Educational policies and overall work culture in the Country needs to appreciate this reality. Just as AI experts are trying hard to 'teach' AI algorithms and improve them through supervised learning, another set of experts need to sensitize and teach humans on how to understand, appreciate, preserve, and further hone the significant natural advantage that they already have over AI. Despite all the technological breakthroughs in AI, in many areas, still, it is a battle that humans will lose only if they choose to. (The writer works in the Information Technology sector. Views personal.)

BJP in Pune: From margins to mainstream

From Anna Joshi’s grassroots charm to Murlidhar Mohol’s ascendancy, the BJP has long treated Pune as a laboratory for grooming leaders. With another municipal election looming, the experiment is about to be tested again

Murlidhar Mohol
Murlidhar Mohol

Pune: When the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was founded in 1980, Pune was hardly a bastion. The party’s presence was scattered; its cadre was spread thin and its symbol (a flickering oil lamp inherited from the Jana Sangh) was known more for token representation than serious power. Today, the story could not be more different. The BJP is preparing to contest the city’s municipal polls with the ambition of capturing more than 100 of the 165-odd seats. That confidence has been built not by accident but by a deliberate and decades-long strategy of continuously cultivating new leadership.


It is a method the party has deployed elsewhere in Maharashtra, most recently in Mumbai, where Ameet Satam, a three-term legislator from Andheri West, was recently appointed president of the city unit. But in Pune, the practice has been almost laboratory-like in its consistency. From the 1980s onward, the party has elevated figures, encouraged experimentation, and relied on collective leadership when necessary. Each generation of leaders was carefully given space to grow, and sometimes even allowed to fail.


The first crop of BJP leaders in Pune - Rambhau Mhalgi, Anna Joshi, Arvind Lele, Prem Advani and Shankarrao Yadav - were men of organisation more than mass. Of them, Anna Joshi and Arvind Lele formed the most potent duo. Joshi was personable and affable, able to converse with workers and voters across the social spectrum. Lele, by contrast, was the party’s ideological anchor, a meticulous organiser who supplied the structure Joshi’s charisma needed. The combination proved effective as Joshi bested seasoned Congress leaders in the Assembly and Lok Sabha contests. Whispers at the time suggested that Sharad Pawar’s loyalists quietly aided Joshi’s rise, though the BJP’s success was also a testament to its growing roots.


In 1984, the party fielded Jagannathrao Joshi, a scholar-politician of formidable intellect and oratory, though he lost the election. Yet his candidacy marked a turning point. He appealed to the city’s educated middle classes and, more importantly, legitimised the BJP’s ideological seriousness. In effect, he tilled the ground for the next generation of Pune’s BJP leaders to flourish.


Generation next

That next generation emerged rapidly. The 1980s and 1990s saw the rise of Girish Bapat, Yogesh Gogawale, Vishwas Gangurde, Vijay Kale, Pradeep Rawat, Anil Shirole, Dilip Kamble and Ashok Salunke. National heavyweights like Pramod Mahajan and Gopinath Munde were quick to spot the promise of Pune’s emerging cadre, ensuring they were nurtured and rewarded. Bapat, who contested the 1996 Lok Sabha elections, established city-wide networks that propelled him into the ranks of state and national politics. Rawat became an MP in 1999; Shirole was elevated to both city president and parliamentarian. By the end of the 1990s, the BJP in Pune had gone from fringe to fixture.

This was not merely a story of individual elevation but of systematic opportunity. Those who demonstrated loyalty and competence were given their turn. Bapat became both cabinet minister and MP. Prakash Javadekar rose to the Union cabinet. Dilip Kamble held ministerial rank. Vijay Kale and Vishwas Gangurde became legislators, later chairing the municipal corporation. Ujwal Keskar became leader of the opposition in the same body. Even those who did not scale dizzying heights like Gogawale and Vikas Mathkari were trusted with corporator and city president roles.


The strategy was not limited to men. When Sharad Pawar, then Chief Minister, introduced the 33 percent reservation for women in local self-government bodies, the BJP capitalised on it. It fielded and promoted women leaders, who would go on to reshape its Pune story. Mukta Tilak became the city’s first BJP mayor in 2017 and later an MLA. Medha Kulkarni secured both legislative and parliamentary berths. Madhuri Misal, thrice elected corporator, rose to become a minister of state. These successes were built on the path first trodden by Maltibai Paranjape of the Jana Sangh, the lone woman corporator of an earlier era. Her symbolic presence became substantive reality.


Collective leadership

By the 2010s, the BJP’s Pune bench was so deep that collective leadership again became the order of the day. Today, Union Minister of State Murlidhar Mohol, higher education minister Chandrakant Patil, city president Dheeraj Ghate, MLAs Siddharth Shirole, Sunil Kamble, Hemant Rasne, Ganesh Bidkar, Srinath Bhimale and Jagdish Mulik all represent the city’s multiple strands of BJP power. Of these, Mohol is being entrusted with particular responsibility. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, long attentive to Pune’s strategic importance, has ensured that this generation is tested early and often.


Whether this strategy will deliver another sweep in the municipal elections remains uncertain. The BJP today faces a crowded political landscape, with rivals eager to exploit anti-incumbency and discontent over local governance. Yet history suggests that the BJP’s ‘Pune model’ which has constantly fed new leaders into the machine is built for endurance. The party does not merely win elections but creates a cadre capable of contesting and consolidating power across generations.


If the BJP secures more than 100 seats in the upcoming municipal polls, as it hopes, it will confirm not just a city-wide dominance but the efficacy of a political experiment that has been running quietly since 1980. From Anna Joshi’s charisma to Jagannathrao Joshi’s intellect, from Girish Bapat’s organisational heft to Mukta Tilak’s pioneering mayoralty, Pune has been both crucible and showcase. The party has repeatedly reinvented itself here. The BJP may well be the most disciplined practitioner of a simple political truth which is, in Pune, leaders are not born - they are made.

Comments


bottom of page