top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Campus Coercion

Jamia Millia Islamia, one of Delhi’s most storied universities, finds itself at the heart of yet another firestorm. Accusations by the NGO ‘Call For Justice’ allege that a cabal within the university has systematically targeted Hindu students, faculty and staff, coercing them to convert to Islam under threats that range from academic sabotage to sexual violence. The charges are severe, disturbing, and, if true, point to an environment steeped in discrimination and intimidation.


The investigation, spearheaded by a committee including a former Delhi HC judge and a former Delhi Police Commissioner among others, uncovered testimonies that paint a bleak picture. Hindu students reported being forced to recite the Kalma (the Islamic oath of allegiance) and faced the threat of academic penalties for refusal. More horrifying still are claims of acid attack threats and the use of sexual harassment as a weapon to break resistance. The report also suggests that preferential admissions were leveraged to manipulate vulnerable groups, particularly SC/ST Hindu students, as part of a broader scheme of religious coercion.


The allegations reach beyond students; Hindu and Christian faculty and non-teaching staff claim they have been denied promotions and overworked as punitive measures for their faith. According to a member of the fact-finding team, over 50 individuals have come forward, with 27 statements already recorded. Yet, despite this outcry, Jamia’s administration remains conspicuously silent, failing to assuage growing fears or pledge transparency. The spectre of ‘love jihad’ emerges in the findings, suggesting that romantic relationships have been exploited as a conduit for conversion. Coupled with accusations of social ostracism and targeted harassment, these revelations demand more than perfunctory probes.


The silence of so-called ‘progressive’ media in this context is striking. When allegations arise involving discrimination against Hindus, their response is notably muted. This selective outrage raises questions about the objectivity of their advocacy and the underlying biases that inform their coverage. Such double standards erode public trust in the media and obscure the pursuit of balanced truth.


No stranger to controversy, Jamia Millia Islamia was a significant site during the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests in 2019, which escalated into clashes between students and law enforcement. Instead of actually fostering any intellectual debate, the varsity, like its peer, the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), has been accused of fostering radical elements and fostering discord. More recently, Diwali celebrations in Jamia were disrupted and marked by chants of ‘Palestine Zindabad.’


Universities should be arenas of open discourse and safe spaces for all ideologies, not grounds for sectarian power plays. The stakes are high. For India’s democracy to thrive, its institutions, especially its universities, must embody inclusivity and fairness. The nation’s future demands it.

Comments


bottom of page