top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

Sack, jail Kumar: Uddhav

Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray today demanded the immediate removal and arrest of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and fresh elections in Maharashtra, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu in the wake of differences emerging in the Election Commission of India’s top brass. Referring to reports in a media report that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had reportedly raised objections on multiple occasions over certain decisions concerning...

Sack, jail Kumar: Uddhav

Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray today demanded the immediate removal and arrest of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and fresh elections in Maharashtra, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu in the wake of differences emerging in the Election Commission of India’s top brass. Referring to reports in a media report that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had reportedly raised objections on multiple occasions over certain decisions concerning electoral rolls and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR), Thackeray accused the ECI of becoming ‘a part of a wider political operation’ intended to weaken democratic institutions. “There’s a ‘gang’ of people within the election system that is conniving to split political parties, grab their names and poll symbols, and are ‘murdering democracy’. The horrific, ugly and grotesque face of Gyanesh Kumar has been exposed. The Supreme Court must take suo motu cognizance of the entire controversy,” demanded Thackeray. Pointing to the ECI claims that it follows the directives of the Ministry of Home Affairs, he said “this raises questions whether the Home Minister is the ‘mastermind’, which needs to be clarified”. “If so, then he too must face the appropriate punishment,” said Thackeray, hinting at Amit Shah. Dwelling on the expose on ECI, he slammed the poll panel for “operating in an arbitrary fashion with Gyanesh Kumar, who is driven by a lust for power”, and reiterated that the CEC must be removed and jailed forthwith. To a query on following the rules, Thackeray shot back: “Did he follow the rules? Then why talk of rules for him sack and jail him. We salute the two ECs (Sandhu and Joshi) for bringing this out and opening the eyes of the country.” Attempting to douse the flames engulfing its credibility, the ECI said that there may be differences but these were thoroughly discussed and all the final decisions were taken unanimously by all the three top functionaries with their signatures. Thackery said around 45 lakh voters were added to the electoral rolls between the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections (both 2024), and objections were subsequently raised on more than 40 lakh of those voter names. NCP (SP) seeks all-party meet The Sharad Pawar-led NCP (SP) on Wednesday called for an immediate all-party meeting to discuss reports of differences emerging within the Election Commission, saying the issue concerns the constitutional rights of every citizen and should not be treated as a political matter. She said the allegations should be discussed openly to establish whether there was any substance in them. Asked if Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar should “step aside”, Sule said there should be an open discussion on whether the allegations are true. “If the system is going to collapse, then who we should trust in this country,” the Lok Sabha member from Baramati constituency in western Maharashtra said.

Campus split over caste allegations

1 hour ago
2 min read

Mumbai: The ongoing controversy surrounding the suicide of an IIT-Bombay student and the caste-related allegations in the case has raised questions among students and faculty on the campus. While the parents of the deceased have alleged that their child faced caste-based discrimination, differing views have emerged regarding the circumstances surrounding the incident.


To understand the perspective of Gen Z on the matter, ‘The Perfect Voice’ spoke to several college students.


A second-year student, Divyansh Ojha, said that the professor should not be held responsible for the suicide. “The professor has not done anything wrong. I support Professor Surya in this case. If any other teacher had been in the professor’s place and caught a student cheating in an examination, he or she would have done the same thing. He cannot be held at fault for that,” Ojha said.


Speaking about the B Tech student Sahil Wakode, who died by suicide, Ojha said the student may have been experiencing mental-health difficulties that led to the extreme step. “His parents are misusing the SC/ST Act. I understand that the issue of caste discrimination can be genuine, but you cannot blame the entire incident on the professor. Having the SC/ST Act does not mean that one can blame anyone and ruin their life. I am clearly supporting the professor here,” he added.


Another student, who requested anonymity, said that, based on the information available about the case, the professor was being treated unfairly. “We are literally trying to justify cheating here,” the student said.


Commenting on the protests, the student added, “I do not even know the purpose behind their protest.”


A third-year student, Aamna, said she saw arguments on both sides of the controversy but raised questions about the role of caste in the public discussion surrounding the case. “I am on both sides, but I have a simple question: if the student had not belonged to the SC or ST category but had been from the general category, would this case have become a headline in the media?” she asked.


She added, “I do not think that he would have committed suicide just because he was accused of cheating. We only know the tip of the iceberg. So, surely, this is more than just a case of suicide.”


Another female student, who requested anonymity, alleged that the SC/ST Act was being misused against the professor. “The case tells us how the SC/ST Act is getting misused against such an intellectual professor who has been successful as a teacher as well,” she said.


She further said, “Today, everyone talks about India’s youth producing semiconductor chips, working with Qualcomm and advancing quantum computing. How will we do it if we do injustice to professors like these?”


The students’ responses reflect the differing opinions on campus, with some questioning the allegations against the professor and others highlighting the broader issue of caste and discrimination in educational institutions. However, the students believe the circumstances surrounding the fellow student’s death and the claims of caste-based discrimination need to be assessed on the basis of verified evidence.

Comments


bottom of page