top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Celluloid Ambitions

Maharashtra is doubling down on its claim as India’s entertainment capital. Recently, the State government approved a sprawling new film city in Igatpuri, Nashik district, a 54-hectare complex in Mundegaon village that promises more than mere shooting facilities. With studios, outdoor sets and an amusement park modelled after Hyderabad’s Ramoji Film City, the hub is designed to cater to both filmmakers’ logistical needs and tourists’ appetite for spectacle. Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar has framed the project as a boost to local employment and business, particularly in hospitality and transport.


The timing is telling. Maharashtra already hosts the legendary Dadasaheb Phalke Chitranagari in Goregaon, Mumbai. Yet the city’s congestion and high costs have long posed constraints on the industry. Igatpuri, perched amid scenic hills and accessible via the Mumbai-Nagpur Samruddhi Expressway in under two hours, offers a more spacious, diverse, and convenient filming destination. It comes in handy for a production company as the sets and studios are easier to book, transport is faster and the surrounding natural landscape lends itself to outdoor shoots that Mumbai’s urban sprawl cannot. Economically, the government’s calculus is straightforward. The film city is expected to generate local employment and stimulate Nashik’s economy, echoing the model of other integrated film hubs. Hotels, restaurants, transport operators and ancillary service providers stand to benefit. Film tourism, a sector that has gained prominence globally, could further anchor Igatpuri as a destination beyond production schedules.


Yet there is a strategic subtext. Maharashtra is facing competition, particularly from the Yogi Adityanath-led Uttar Pradesh government. The latter, through Bayview Bhutani Film City near Greater Noida, is staking a bold claim in the cinematic landscape. Spread over 1,000 acres along the Yamuna Expressway, the Noida project promises cutting-edge sound stages, underwater studios, a film and television institute and long-term accommodations for actors. Uttar Pradesh is aiming to generate hundreds of thousands of jobs and lure both domestic and international productions through its Noida film city project. Its proximity to the upcoming Noida International Airport adds logistical convenience that even Mumbai struggles to match.


Maharashtra’s response, therefore, is as much defensive as it is developmental. The Igatpuri film city is a statement that the state intends to remain India’s cinematic nucleus. The government is betting that by offering accessible infrastructure, a scenic backdrop, and a diversified entertainment experience, it can hold off rivals eager to attract the industry’s lucrative investments. Igatpuri’s venture also reflects a broader trend of decentralisation of the Indian entertainment industry. As states vie for cultural cachet and economic gain, film cities are evolving into integrated hubs combining production, education, tourism and leisure. They are no longer ornamental but strategic assets, instruments of economic development and tools of soft power. Maharashtra’s approach embodies a pragmatic blend of spectacle and practicality. In doing so, it not only safeguards Mumbai’s pre-eminence but also ensures that India’s cinema industry has room to grow beyond the city’s crowded confines.

Comments


bottom of page