top of page

By:

Waleed Hussain

4 March 2025 at 2:34:30 pm

RCB steaming in to IPL 2026

RCB's bowling attack enters IPL 2026 as a pace-dominant unit that powered their maiden title win in 2025, but defending the crown demands addressing spin vulnerabilities and injury risks. This SWOT analysis reveals a transformed attack capable of contending, yet not invincible against evolving T20 tactics. Strengths RCB's pace trio of Josh Hazlewood, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, and Yash Dayal forms a world-class core, blending swing, bounce, and left-arm angle variation. Hazlewood's 22 wickets at...

RCB steaming in to IPL 2026

RCB's bowling attack enters IPL 2026 as a pace-dominant unit that powered their maiden title win in 2025, but defending the crown demands addressing spin vulnerabilities and injury risks. This SWOT analysis reveals a transformed attack capable of contending, yet not invincible against evolving T20 tactics. Strengths RCB's pace trio of Josh Hazlewood, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, and Yash Dayal forms a world-class core, blending swing, bounce, and left-arm angle variation. Hazlewood's 22 wickets at 17.55 in IPL 2025 showcased his powerplay and death-over mastery, while Bhuvneshwar's economy under 8 provided control on flat tracks. All-rounders like Krunal Pandya (key wickets in finals) and new buys Venkatesh Iyer and Romario Shepherd add seam options and balance, enabling flexible overseas slots with Jacob Duffy and Nuwan Thushara as backups. This depth turned RCB's historic bowling weakness into a title-winning asset last season. Weaknesses Spin remains RCB's Achilles' heel, lacking a consistent middle-overs wicket-taker despite Suyash Sharma's retention and Vicky Ostwal's addition. Suyash managed only 8 wickets at 8.84 economy in 2025, excelling in containment but faltering on turning pitches, forcing over-reliance on Krunal's left-arm spin. Age (Hazlewood and Bhuvneshwar at 34-35) and injury histories pose risks, as seen in Hazlewood's prior calf issues, potentially exposing thinner domestic pace like Rasikh Dar or Abhinandan Singh. Uncapped buys like Mangesh Yadav offer promise but unproven IPL pedigree under playoff pressure. Opportunities IPL 2026's mini-auction additions like Duffy (death specialist) and Iyer (medium-pace variety) allow tactical experimentation on batting-friendly Indian pitches. Home advantage at Chinnaswamy's short boundaries favors their high-pace attack, where swing early and yorkers late can defend 200-plus totals, as proven in 2025 defenses. Emerging Indian talents (Dayal, Ostwal) could step up amid India's T20 World Cup cycle, while opponents' spin-heavy strategies (e.g., CSK's Noor Ahmad) create matchups for RCB's seamers to dominate powerplays. Title momentum fosters mental edge, positioning RCB to poach form players mid-season if needed. Threats Defending champions face heightened scrutiny, with rivals like KKR (Cameron Green at Rs 25cr) bolstering all-round attacks to target RCB's spin gaps on slower venues like Chennai or Lucknow. Batter-friendly IPL trends—record 2025 sixes in finals—amplify threats from power-hitters like PBKS's Shashank Singh, who troubled RCB before. Injury clusters could deplete overseas options (max 4), straining uncapped depth amid congested schedules. Budget constraints post-retentions (Rs 16.4cr spent judiciously) limit mid-season fixes if form dips, echoing past chokes despite strong paper squads. Path Forward RCB's bowlers must prioritize spin drills and workload management to sustain 2025 form (top-3 powerplay wickets). Rajat Patidar's captaincy can leverage data analytics for pitch-specific combos, blending Hazlewood's strike with Krunal's control. If they plug spin via Suyash's growth or Ostwal's breakout, repeat glory beckons; otherwise, pace alone won't suffice against IPL's batting evolution. Defending demands evolution, not complacency—RCB's attack has the bones, but execution will define their legacy. (The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)

Choking Mumbai

For decades, Mumbai was perceived as a rare urban oasis, where the saline sweep of the Arabian Sea blunted the worst ravages of India's air pollution. That illusion has now been dispelled. A meticulous four-year study by Respirer Living Sciences (RLS), using data from its AtlasAQ platform, reveals the bleak truth that the city’s air is thick with pollutants all year round, with no ‘clean season’ left.


Mumbai’s annual average levels of PM10 (particulate matter ten microns or less in diameter) have consistently breached the national safety threshold of 60 micrograms per cubic metre (μg/m³). This is not merely a seasonal malaise tied to cooler winter months, as once assumed. Alarmingly, the city’s pollution levels persist even through the hot season, a time when improved atmospheric dispersion should offer natural reprieve.


Across the city - from Chakala in Andheri East to Deonar, Kurla, Vile Parle West and Mazgaon - pollution has become an unrelenting, ubiquitous presence.


The culprits are well known: traffic emissions from a burgeoning number of vehicles; unregulated dust from frenzied construction; industrial activity in and around the ports; and a conspicuous lack of dust control measures. Mumbai’s ceaseless growth now risks becoming a chronic liability.


Worryingly, the regulatory response remains sluggish. Mumbai’s urban planning continues to treat clean air as a peripheral concern, not a foundational necessity. Development plans rarely integrate environmental impact assessments in a meaningful way.


A sharper, citywide strategy is urgently needed. Dust suppression rules at construction sites must be enforced strictly, with financial penalties for violators and incentives for best practices. Traffic management systems should be overhauled to ease congestion and encourage the use of public transport. Expansion of clean, reliable mass transit network needs to be urgently prioritised. In addition, comprehensive real-time air monitoring at the ward level should be deployed, enabling authorities to respond to localised pollution spikes swiftly rather than relying on citywide averages that conceal dangerous hotspots.


Longer-term, clean air targets must be hardwired into the city’s master planning and transport policies. Green buffers along major traffic corridors, stricter emission norms for commercial vehicles and incentives for rooftop gardens and urban afforestation could all play a part. Industrial zones near port areas should be subjected to rigorous air quality compliance measures, not token self-certifications. Private developers and large infrastructure firms, often among the worst offenders, must be made stakeholders in the clean air mission through binding regulations.


Mumbai’s commercial dynamism - as a magnet for migrants, entrepreneurs and investors - depends not just on glittering skyscrapers but on something far more basic: the ability to breathe. Unless clean air becomes an unshakeable priority, the city risks suffocating its own future. For a metropolis that prides itself on its resilience against terror attacks, monsoon floods and economic shocks, the real test will be whether it can muster the will to fight an invisible, pervasive enemy slowly corroding the lives of its 20 million citizens.

Comments


bottom of page