top of page

By:

Divyaa Advaani 

2 November 2024 at 3:28:38 am

When agreement kills growth

In the early stages of building a business, growth is often driven by clarity, speed, and conviction. Founders make decisions quickly, rely on their instincts, and push forward with a strong sense of belief in their methods. This decisiveness is not only necessary, it is often the very reason the business begins to grow. However, as businesses cross certain thresholds, particularly beyond the Rs 5 crore mark, the nature of growth begins to change. What once created momentum can quietly begin...

When agreement kills growth

In the early stages of building a business, growth is often driven by clarity, speed, and conviction. Founders make decisions quickly, rely on their instincts, and push forward with a strong sense of belief in their methods. This decisiveness is not only necessary, it is often the very reason the business begins to grow. However, as businesses cross certain thresholds, particularly beyond the Rs 5 crore mark, the nature of growth begins to change. What once created momentum can quietly begin to create limitations. In many professional environments, it is not uncommon to encounter business owners who are deeply convinced of their approach. Their methods have delivered results, their experience reinforces their judgment, and their confidence becomes a defining trait. Yet, in this very confidence lies a subtle risk that is often overlooked. When conviction turns into certainty without space for dialogue, conversations begin to narrow. Suggestions are heard, but not always considered. Perspectives are offered, but not always encouraged. Decisions are made, but not always explained. From the outside, this may still appear as strong leadership. Internally, however, a different dynamic begins to take shape. People start to agree more than they contribute. This is where many businesses unknowingly enter a critical phase. When teams, partners, or stakeholders begin to hold back their perspective, the quality of thinking around the business reduces. What appears as alignment is often silent disengagement. What looks like efficiency is sometimes the absence of challenge. Over time, this directly affects the decisions being made. At a Rs 5 crore level, this may not be immediately visible. Operations continue, revenue flows, and the business appears stable. But as the organisation attempts to grow further, this lack of diverse thinking begins to surface as a constraint. Growth slows, not because of lack of effort, but because of limited perspective. On the other side of this equation are individuals who consistently find themselves accommodating such dynamics. They recognise when their voice is not being fully heard, yet choose not to assert it. The intention is often to preserve relationships, avoid friction, or maintain a sense of professional ease. Initially, this approach appears collaborative. Over time, however, it begins to shape perception. When individuals do not express their perspective, they are gradually seen as agreeable rather than essential. Their presence is valued, but their input is not actively sought. In many cases, they become part of the process, but not part of the decision. This is where personal branding begins to influence business outcomes in ways that are not immediately obvious. A personal brand is not built only through visibility or achievement. It is built through how consistently one demonstrates clarity, confidence, and openness in moments that require it. It is shaped by whether people feel encouraged to think around you, or restricted in your presence. At higher levels of business, this distinction becomes critical. If people agree with you more than they challenge you, it may not be a sign of strong leadership. It may be an indication that your environment is no longer enabling better thinking. Similarly, if you find yourself constantly adjusting to others without expressing your own perspective, your contribution may be diminishing in ways that affect both your influence and your growth. Both situations carry a cost. They affect decision quality, limit innovation, and over time, restrict the scalability of the business itself. What makes this particularly challenging is that these patterns develop gradually, often going unnoticed until the impact becomes difficult to ignore. The most effective leaders recognise this early. They create space for dialogue without losing direction. They express conviction without dismissing perspective. They build environments where contribution is expected, not avoided. In doing so, they strengthen not only their business, but also their personal brand. For entrepreneurs operating at a stage where growth is no longer just about execution but about expanding thinking, this becomes an important point of reflection. If there is even a possibility that your current interactions are limiting the quality of thinking around you, it is worth addressing before it begins to affect outcomes. I work with a select group of founders and professionals to help them refine how they are perceived, communicate with greater impact, and build personal brands that support sustained growth. You may explore this further here: https://sprect.com/pro/divyaaadvaani In the long run, it is not only the decisions you make, but the thinking you allow around those decisions, that determines how far your business can truly grow. (The author is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries. Views personal.)

Choosing Her Battle

Updated: Nov 25, 2024

Her Battle

As anticipated in a long, polarised presidential campaign, Trump’s win has reignited the fight for reproductive freedom in the United States. The current social media trend on the Pro-Choice v. Pro-Life debate exposed America’s deep-seated division over women’s rights. But alas, the whole discussion is centred on the right to terminate the pregnancy.


The June 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision to end the constitutional right to abortion paved the way for the states to prohibit abortion completely. Biden’s government kept the issue hanging until the 2024 election to use it as a foil against conservative Republicans.


Currently, about 28 of the 50 US states have hostile regulations; of these, four states have outlawed abortion at 6 weeks; in India, this limit is set at 24 weeks. The 17 US states intend to confer personhood either on fetuses or embryos, which would prohibit the use of emergency contraceptive pills. Conservative lawmakers who have already curtailed reproductive rights in over half of the country are now pushing to restrict access to birth control and IVFs. 13 US states have imposed a complete abortion ban without exceptions for rape or incest, as the American conservatives fear that by playing the victim, women would take advantage of rape exceptions? The state offers no exception, even to a child who has just attained puberty. Feel the anguish of the innocent child who is devastated by man’s brutality and is left with no legal alternative but to carry the unwanted result of the traumatic assault or face criminal punishment for abortion. Furthermore, South Carolina and Louisiana Republicans have proposed the “death penalty” for women who have abortions; it is a fact that I had to check again to believe.


In the US, women in a state with an abortion ban or restrictive laws are compelled to travel to other states where the procedure is permitted. Sometimes, the one-way journey takes over 12 hours to reach the nearest clinic. Those who cannot afford long travels or work-offs are often forced to opt for unsafe and illegal medical procedures. The abortion ban pushes the dejected, desperate women to seek out dangerous methods, resulting in huge fatalities. Would you still call this “Pro-life”? The pregnant women diagnosed with cancer find themselves between the devil and the deep sea. They have to convince the court that it is a medical emergency and plead for their lives or travel far to undergo an abortion. This causes a delay in starting cancer treatment and tons of anxiety.


Some border cities in the US prohibit individuals from helping patients crossing borders to access abortion, and also from possessing and distributing abortion pills in the city. These abortion restrictions lead to patients being given less effective medication and a trauma that is hard to heal! Is it not a moral obligation of the state to ensure its citizens have access to medical care? Is it not fundamental to medical care to respect the patient’s needs and not judge the patient’s morality?


Analysis of state-level reproductive rights and population data reveals that abortion is completely banned in states with a coloured population of roughly 20 per cent or more. These are the states where, from 1970 till the 1990s, over one million women of colour were forcibly sterilised or coerced into using unsafe contraceptives for prolonged times! Some university hospitals removed poor women’s uteruses, without medical grounds. It was a systematic genocide of the coloured race, carried out not using guns or weapons of mass destruction, but using a tiny birth control pill. Is the current blanket ban on abortion meant to cover up the government’s past evils? Or, is it a new wicked plan to support the labour-intensive industries?


The mealy-mouthed response of President Trump on future abortion policies has spooked American women so much that they are stockpiling contraceptives before his term begins. Meanwhile, very disturbing social media trends have erupted, in which American women are expressing violent fantasies of poisoning and killing their partner to prevent unwanted pregnancy. And to which the misogynist men are retorting with hashtags such as, ‘Your Body, Our Choice’ and ‘Get Back In the Kitchen’. These social media trends have exposed the ingrained inequality between genders fostered by social norms and expectations. And also the failed body politics of the United States. How can American women ever hope to achieve reproductive justice if all they do is bickering and sputtering on social media about a single issue? Doesn’t the woman’s choice extend far beyond a pregnancy?


If a woman can’t have control of her body, she can’t control her life. Her mental, physical, and emotional health, her social behaviour, her education, her vocational skills, her career goals, her motherhood, her ability to create, love, nurture, and her influence on the world, everything is diminished. She lives a smaller life.


In this era of Judicial globalisation, the legal systems of various countries borrow ideas and doctrines from one another and refer to foreign judgments in their domestic court proceedings, and the Indian judicial system is no exception. Here, we cannot ignore the negative dimension of judicial globalisation, where such precedents relating to abortion law by conservative courts might attract undue weightage and influence other countries’ domestic decisions.


In India, abortion is legal with certain restrictions. It is not a constitutional right; the right to life and personal liberty is interpreted to include reproductive choice. However, recently, in two cases, the Indian courts denied abortion on the grounds of mental depression. After making progressive amendments to the MTP Act in 2021 and 2022, India took a step backwards in recognising women’s reproductive autonomy.


Changing societal attitudes is necessary to eliminate the stigma and moral judgement surrounding women’s reproductive decisions. It needs sensitive support and all-inclusive open advocacy, which can be ensured only with public awareness, education and acknowledging the need of Reproductive Justice. Reproductive Justice means empowering women to make decisions about their bodies, including access to contraception, abortion, and assisted reproduction facilities, freedom from sexual violence, freedom from coerced usage of birth control and the ability to choose to have and raise a child. It must not be reduced to the option of ending the pregnancy. And certainly, it should not be promoted by reckless, cheap social media trends but by choosing the battle carefully.


(The author is a foreign affairs expert. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page