top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Crass Comedy

Kunal Kamra, India’s self-proclaimed dissenter-in-chief, has again made news - not for wit, but for predictable provocation. His recent stand-up routine in Mumbai where he mocked Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister and Shiv Sena leader Eknath Shinde, triggered an expected political backlash as Sena workers ransacked the venue, filed police complaints and threatened Kamra with dire consequences. Sena leaders accused him of being a “contract comedian” on the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s payroll.


While certain online ‘liberals’ and leaders like Aaditya Thackeray are making this out to be a case of rising intolerance, this episode, in fact, lays bare the sorry state of Indian stand-up comedy. Kamra is no fearless satirist but a partisan hack in a comic’s garb, using his platform less for humour and more as a cudgel for his ideological leanings. His act mocking Shinde, like much of his material, was neither clever nor insightful but a lazy political jab dressed up as comedy, delivered not to entertain but to provoke. His jokes have been predictable, his targets repetitive and his style devoid of nuance.


This is emblematic of the larger decay in the Indian stand-up genre, which has morphed into a refuge for self-righteous political commentators masquerading as comedians. Much of it is neither subversive nor funny but crude, tasteless and unoriginal. Kamra and fellow comedian Samay Raina frequently perform their controversial acts at the Habitat Comedy Club in Mumbai, a venue that has become synonymous with inflammatory content.


Cheap sex jokes and foul language have increasingly replaced Indian observational comedy and satire. Vir Das, another comic who thrives on political controversy, has made a career out of pandering to Western audiences with a predictable mix of self-flagellation and righteous posturing. Instead of engaging with complex issues, Indian comedians peddle easy outrage, appealing to echo chambers rather than audiences. The audience laps it up, proving that India’s comedy scene seemingly values provocation over intelligence.


More disturbing is the hypocrisy. Many so-called comedians claim to stand for free speech but operate within narrow ideological confines. Kamra and his ilk routinely mock Hindu traditions and attack the ruling party but seldom direct their barbs at opposition politicians or controversial figures from the left. Where are their scathing takes on dynastic politics, corruption within so-called ‘secular’ parties or Islamist extremism? The courage they claim to wield is selective. Unlike the likes of Jon Stewart or Ricky Gervais, who skewer both sides, Indian stand-ups have reduced themselves to mouthpieces for one faction.


This intellectual dishonesty is why Indian stand-up remains shallow and ineffective. It fails to capture the breadth of cultural tensions or provide sharp, self-reflective humour. Instead, it serves as a means for self-congratulatory grandstanding. The controversy surrounding Kamra is not about free speech but about bad comedy masquerading as political resistance. If stand-up in India is to be taken seriously, it must first clean its house and most importantly, learn to be funny.

Comments


bottom of page