top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

Thackeray wants freeze on ‘Bow-and-Arrow’

Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray has backed Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal’s suggestion that the rival Shiv Sena’s ‘Bow-and-Arrow’ election symbol be frozen immediately if the Supreme Court does not restore it to his faction - contending that it was ‘stolen’ by the breakaway faction led by Eknath Shinde, here on Tuesday. Thackeray added - as the Supreme Court continues the final hearing in the matter – that the iconic symbol was usurped by ruling Mahayuti ally, Shiv Sena led by...

Thackeray wants freeze on ‘Bow-and-Arrow’

Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray has backed Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal’s suggestion that the rival Shiv Sena’s ‘Bow-and-Arrow’ election symbol be frozen immediately if the Supreme Court does not restore it to his faction - contending that it was ‘stolen’ by the breakaway faction led by Eknath Shinde, here on Tuesday. Thackeray added - as the Supreme Court continues the final hearing in the matter – that the iconic symbol was usurped by ruling Mahayuti ally, Shiv Sena led by Shinde, and it was ‘misused to seize power’ – riding on the goodwill of the party launched by Balasaheb Thackeray 60 years ago. “The matter is going on for so long in the courts… If the verdict is being delayed for any reasons, the ‘Bow-and-Arrow’ symbol should be immediately frozen,” declared Thackeray, supporting Sibal’s arguments in the court over the Election Commission of India (ECI) decision four years ago. He added that there was actually no need at all for a prolonged legal battle on this. “The ECI is currently scrutinising our party constitution and other details. But consider how six registered unrecognised political parties (of Gujarat) turned out to be bogus recently, existing only on paper, yet having assets-donations of hundreds of crores of rupees. Is the ECI examining their constitutions, or is there any complicity,” Thackeray asked sharply. It may be recalled that the SS (UBT) has strongly challenged the ECI’s decision to recognise the Shinde-led Shiv Sena as the ‘real’ one and allotting it the iconic party’s name and poll symbol of ‘Bow-and-Arrow’ in February 2023. The two parties’ row returned to limelight again - four years after the (undivided) Shiv Sena split - and the ECI had temporarily frozen the ‘Bow-and-Arrow’ in October 2022, when both factions were barred from using the original party name and symbol pending adjudication. Later, the Thackeray faction was allotted the ‘Flaming Torch’, while the Shinde faction retained not only the Shiv Sena name, the ‘Bow-and-Arrow’ symbol, but was also declared as the original party. Hitting out at Shinde’s criticism that freezing the poll symbol would be akin to shelving Balasaheb Thackeray’s ideology into the cold storage, Thackeray said: “Let it pass… His (Shinde’s) mind is frozen.” Referring to speculation in political circles that the Shinde party is working on an ‘Operation Tiger’ targeting the Ss (UBT), Thackeray took a swipe, saying: “Anyone who can perform an ‘operation on a tiger’ is yet to be born…!” Festival Noise Thackeray raised the prickly issue of the Mahayuti government’s handling of festival noise restrictions, the controversy over DJs in dahi-handi, Ganeshotsav and other fests, the leakages in public examination questions papers and reiterated support for the students movements in different parts including the Jantar Mantar in Delhi last month. “The sanctity of all festivals must be maintained. They should not be reduced to a ‘cacophony’ with so much noise. What is the need for dance and song events? Does it fit into the concept of a ‘new Hindutva’? Who is responsible for the ban? The CM who holds the home portfolio, of the Police Commissioner of the BMC chief? They should hold discussions with all stake-holders, but are they actually talking to anyone,” the ex-CM wondered.

Dangerous Departures

Updated: Oct 30, 2024

Dangerous Departures

In yet another shocking incident adding to Mumbai’s infamous tryst with stampedes, chaos erupted at Mumbai’s Bandra Terminus following a weekend stampede that left at least ten persons injured, two critically so. A crowd surged toward the Gorakhpur-bound train with nearly 1,500 people vying for seats in 22 unreserved compartments, leading to the stampede. Several others narrowly avoided tragedy, with some even pushed onto the tracks. This is not a unique episode but rather a recurring theme in Mumbai’s bedevilled crowd management, one that has haunted the city’s public spaces, particularly as festive seasons magnify the crowds.


Mumbai is no stranger to stampedes. A horrifying incident in 2017 at Elphinstone Road Station left 23 people dead and nearly 50 injured. The cause was a familiar one: an overwhelming crowd confined to a narrow footbridge during peak rush hour. The tragedy sparked an outcry, with promises from authorities to upgrade infrastructure and enhance safety protocols. Yet seven years on, crowd-related incidents continue to be a constant danger. Today’s incident reveals a similar lapse—a lack of foresight in managing the thousands who gather on platforms ahead of Diwali, eager to return to family. That the Gorakhpur Express was unreserved and heavily crowded was predictable.


The issue lies beyond simply crowd density; it is emblematic of deeper systemic negligence. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), responsible for local public safety, along with the Railways Ministry, bear responsibility for ensuring order at such high-risk hubs. Although the BMC acknowledged the “festive rush,” it appears little was done to pre-empt it. Swift action could have been taken to either disperse the crowd or reroute passengers. Instead, chaos prevailed.


Political reaction has been swift but uninspiring. Aaditya Thackeray, son of Uddhav Thackeray, launched a scathing attack on the Union Railways Minister, Ashwini Vaishnaw, branding the incident a result of the minister’s “incapable” leadership. This hardly addresses the immediate need: a substantive plan to manage crowds and prevent similar incidents.


Mumbai’s transport infrastructure remains sorely outdated. Platforms are undersized, signalling systems frequently falter, and crowd control mechanisms are grossly inadequate. Despite repeated accidents, there has been little investment in comprehensive crowd management systems or the deployment of personnel trained in emergency response. While railway footbridges were widened after the Elphinstone tragedy, Bandra’s incident demonstrates that such incremental changes are insufficient. Mumbai, which sees a swelling populace during festivals, demands a robust strategy to address its vulnerabilities. This should include technology-driven crowd monitoring, clear communication channels to inform passengers of platform conditions, and additional security and medical staff on high-demand days. It is essential that crowd management training for personnel becomes a priority rather than a reaction to tragedies.

Comments


bottom of page