top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city...

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city will get a ‘Hindu Marathi’ person to head India’s richest civic body, while the Opposition Shiv Sena (UBT)-Maharashtra Navnirman Sena also harbour fond hopes of a miracle that could ensure their own person for the post. The Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) optimism stems from expectations of possible political permutations-combinations that could develop with a realignment of forces as the Supreme Court is hearing the cases involving the Shiv Sena-Nationalist Congress Party this week. Catapulted as the largest single party, the BJP hopes to install a first ever party-man as Mayor, but that may not create history. Way back in 1982-1983, a BJP leader Dr. Prabhakar Pai had served in the top post in Mumbai (then Bombay). Incidentally, Dr. Pai hailed from Udupi district of Karnataka, and his appointment came barely a couple of years after the BJP was formed (1980), capping a distinguished career as a city father, said experts. Originally a Congressman, Dr. Pai later shifted to the Bharatiya Janata Party, then back to Congress briefly, founded the Janata Seva Sangh before immersing himself in social activities. Second Administrator The 2026 Mayoral elections have evoked huge interest not only among Mumbaikars but across the country as it comes after nearly four years since the BMC was governed by an Administrator. This was only the second time in the BMC history that an Administrator was named after April 1984-May 1985. On both occasions, there were election-related issues, the first time the elections got delayed for certain reasons and the second time the polling was put off owing to Ward delimitations and OBC quotas as the matter was pending in the courts. From 1931 till 2022, Mumbai has been lorded over by 76 Mayors, men and women, hailing from various regions, backgrounds, castes and communities. They included Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Sikhs, even a Jew, etc., truly reflecting the cosmopolitan personality of the coastal city and India’s financial powerhouse. In 1931-1932, the Mayor was a Parsi, J. B. Boman Behram, and others from his community followed like Khurshed Framji Nariman (after whom Nariman Point is named), E. A. Bandukwala, Minoo Masani, B. N. Karanjia and other bigwigs. There were Muslims like Hoosenally Rahimtoola, Sultan M. Chinoy, the legendary Yusuf Meherally, Dr. A. U. Memon and others. The Christian community got a fair share of Mayors with Joseph A. D’Souza – who was Member of Constituent Assembly representing Bombay Province for writing-approving the Constitution of India, M. U. Mascarenhas, P. A. Dias, Simon C. Fernandes, J. Leon D’Souza, et al. A Jew Elijah Moses (1937-1938) and a Sikh M. H. Bedi (1983-1984), served as Mayors, but post-1985, for the past 40 years, nobody from any minority community occupied the august post. During the silver jubilee year of the post, Sulochana M. Modi became the first woman Mayor of Mumbai (1956), and later with tweaks in the rules, many women ruled in this post – Nirmala Samant-Prabhavalkar (1994-1995), Vishakha Raut (997-1998), Dr. Shubha Raul (March 2007-Nov. 2009), Shraddha Jadhav (Dec. 2009-March 2012), Snehal Ambedkar (Sep. 2014-March 2017). The last incumbent (before the Administrator) was a government nurse, Kishori Pednekar (Nov. 2019-March 2022) - who earned the sobriquet of ‘Florence Nightingale’ of Mumbai - as she flitted around in her full white uniform at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic, earning the admiration of the citizens. Mumbai Mayor – high-profile post The Mumbai Mayor’s post is considered a crucial step in the political ladder and many went on to become MLAs, MPs, state-central ministers, a Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief Ministers and union ministers. The formidable S. K. Patil was Mayor (1949-1952) and later served in the union cabinets of PMs Jawaharlal Nehru, Lah Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi; Dahyabhai V. Patel (1954-1955) was the son of India’s first Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel; Manohar Joshi (1976-1977) became the CM of Maharashtra, later union minister and Speaker of Lok Sabha; Chhagan Bhujbal (1985-1986 – 1990-1991) became a Deputy CM.

Decoding the U.S. Presidential Election System

Updated: Nov 7, 2024

U.S. Presidential Election System

The U.S. presidential election involves selecting a party nominee through primaries and caucuses, followed by a general election in which the country votes for the president. The two major parties, Democrats and Republicans, each nominate a candidate. Unlike India, where voters elect parliament members who choose the Prime Minister, the U.S. uses an indirect, multi-layered system called the Electoral College.


Primaries and Caucuses

The first phase begins with the primaries and caucuses, which are state-level elections. Primaries resemble what we might think of as a traditional election—voters go to the polls to cast their ballots. Caucuses are meetings of party members where discussions take place before voting. Each state chooses whether to hold a primary or a caucus, and each party has its own way of conducting these elections.


The goal of these primaries and caucuses is for candidates to secure enough delegates or representatives who vote for the candidate at their party’s national convention. Different states offer different numbers of delegates, depending on factors like population size. By winning more delegates, a candidate moves closer to becoming the official nominee of their party.


National Conventions

After the primary and caucus seasons, each party holds a national convention to officially count results and announce their nominee. During these conventions, the candidate presents their platform—policies, and goals they aim to pursue if elected. These events feature speeches, celebrations, and showcase party unity heading into the general election.


General Election Campaign

The candidates then embark on a months-long general election campaign involving rallies, debates, and extensive media coverage, sharing their vision for the future and trying to sway undecided voters. Television debates between candidates often serve as major turning points, allowing voters to directly compare their policies and personalities.


The Electoral College

The most distinctive aspect of the US presidential election is the Electoral College, which was created as a compromise between electing the president by popular vote and having Congress select the president. This system was intended to balance the influence of populous states against smaller states and to ensure a degree of deliberation in the election process. Contrary to popular belief, the President of the United States is chosen through the Electoral College and not by direct votes by its citizens. Each state has a set number of electoral votes, proportional to its population, which adds up to 538 electoral votes nationwide. To win the presidency, a candidate must secure a majority—270 out of 538 electoral votes.


Most states follow a “winner takes all” system, where the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state secures all of its electoral votes. For instance, if a candidate wins the majority of votes in California, they receive all of California’s 55 electoral votes. There are a few exceptions, like Maine and Nebraska, where electoral votes can be split between candidates. This unique feature of the Electoral College means that it’s possible for a candidate to win the presidency without winning the national popular vote—something that has happened in recent elections.


Election Day

Election Day in the United States falls on the first Tuesday in November, a tradition that dates back to the 19th century. This timing was originally chosen to accommodate an agrarian society—November was after the harvest, and Tuesdays allowed voters to travel without interfering with the Sabbath or market day. Although the focus is often on the two main candidates from the Democratic and Republican parties, voters also have the option to choose third-party candidates or write-in candidates.


Once the votes are counted, the results from each state are used to determine how the state’s electors will vote. It is these electors, not the voters themselves, who directly elect the president. This system can sometimes be confusing for those unfamiliar with it, but it plays a crucial role in the federal structure of the United States.


Certification and Inauguration

After Election Day, the results must be officially certified. The electors meet on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December to cast their votes for president and vice president, and the final results are certified by Congress in early January. If all goes smoothly, the new president will be inaugurated on January 20th in a ceremony filled with tradition and symbolism. This event marks the official start of the new president’s four-year term, with the outgoing president transferring the power.


Conclusion

The intricate process of US presidential elections is filled with tradition, strategy, and sometimes controversy, but it stands as a testament to the enduring nature of democracy. As we watch the campaign trails, debates, and results unfold, we should also remember that any outcome will have long-lasting consequences—not just for the United States, but for countries like India and the global community.


(The author is a foreign affairs expert. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page