top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi...

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) partners, the Nationalist Congress Party (SP) and Shiv Sena (UBT). According to Congress insiders, the move is the outcome of more than a year of intense internal consultations following the party’ dismal performance in the 2024 Assembly elections, belying huge expectations. A broad consensus reportedly emerged that the party should chart a “lone-wolf” course to safeguard the core ideals of Congress, turning140-years-old, next month. State and Mumbai-level Congress leaders, speaking off the record, said that although the party gained momentum in the 2019 Assembly and 2024 Lok Sabha elections, it was frequently constrained by alliance compulsions. Several MVA partners, they claimed, remained unyielding on larger ideological and political issues. “The Congress had to compromise repeatedly and soften its position, but endured it as part of ‘alliance dharma’. Others did not reciprocate in the same spirit. They made unilateral announcements and declared candidates or policies without consensus,” a senior state leader remarked. Avoid liabilities He added that some alliance-backed candidates later proved to be liabilities. Many either lost narrowly or, even after winning with the support of Congress workers, defected to Mahayuti constituents - the Bharatiya Janata Party, Shiv Sena, or the Nationalist Congress Party. “More than five dozen such desertions have taken place so far, which is unethical, backstabbing the voters and a waste of all our efforts,” he rued. A Mumbai office-bearer elaborated that in certain constituencies, Congress workers effectively propelled weak allied candidates through the campaign. “Our assessment is that post-split, some partners have alienated their grassroots base, especially in the mofussil regions. They increasingly rely on Congress workers. This is causing disillusionment among our cadre, who see deserving leaders being sidelined and organisational growth stagnating,” he said. Chennithala’s declaration on Saturday was unambiguous: “We will contest all 227 seats independently in the BMC polls. This is the demand of our leaders and workers - to go alone in the civic elections.” Gaikwad added that the Congress is a “cultured and respectable party” that cannot ally with just anyone—a subtle reference to the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), which had earlier targeted North Indians and other communities and is now bidding for an electoral arrangement with the SS(UBT). Both state and city leaders reiterated that barring the BMC elections - where the Congress will take the ‘ekla chalo’ route - the MVA alliance remains intact. This is despite the sharp criticism recently levelled at the Congress by senior SS(UBT) leader Ambadas Danve following the Bihar results. “We are confident that secular-minded voters will support the Congress' fight against the BJP-RSS in local body elections. We welcome backing from like-minded parties and hope to finalize understandings with some soon,” a state functionary hinted. Meanwhile, Chennithala’s firm stance has triggered speculation in political circles about whether the Congress’ informal ‘black-sheep' policy vis-a-vis certain parties will extend beyond the BMC polls.

Dhruv Jurel: The Steady Hand to Fix India’s Wicketkeeping Woes in Tests

ree

In the relentless grind of Test cricket, where endurance trumps explosiveness, India’s wicketkeeping conundrum has long centered on Rishabh Pant. The Delhi dynamite burst onto the scene in 2018 like a thunderclap, his audacious strokeplay injecting white-ball flair into the longest format. But nearly a decade later, as of October 2025, Pant’s tenure feels like a high-wire act teetering on the edge of brilliance and breakdown. Injuries, inconsistencies, and the occasional glovework gaffe have left selectors—and fans—yearning for stability. Enter Dhruv Jurel, the unassuming Uttar Pradesh keeper whose quiet competence is emerging as the antidote to the “Pant problem.”


At 24, Jurel isn’t here to dazzle; he’s here to deliver. A deeper dive into their batting and keeping stats reveals why he could be the long-term fix India needs.


Let’s start with the bat, where Pant’s pyrotechnics have both thrilled and frustrated. Across 50 Tests (as per updated ESPNcricinfo figures through the 2025 England series), Pant has amassed 3,512 runs in 89 innings at an average of 42.3 and a blistering strike rate of 75.2. His highest score remains 146, not out against Australia in 2021, with seven centuries and 13 fifties to his name. Peaks like his twin hundreds (134 and 118) in the 2025 Lord’s Test—making him the first Indian to achieve that in England—underscore his genius.


Pant thrives in chaos, turning deficits into dominance with ramps, scoops, and helicopter shots that defy convention. Yet, the troughs are telling: post his horrific 2022 car crash, his average dipped below 35 in 2024-25, plagued by 12 single-digit scores in his last 20 innings. His aggression, while revolutionary, often borders on recklessness—28 per cent of dismissals via rash shots against spin.


Contrast this with Jurel’s poise. In just six Tests since his 2024 debut, the right-hander has notched 422 runs in nine innings at a mature average of 53.0 and a measured strike rate of 62.4. His highest now stands at 125—a maiden Test century against West Indies in Ahmedabad just days ago, where he anchored a 206-run stand with Ravindra Jadeja to swell India’s lead to 286. Before that knock, Jurel’s 90 in Ranchi (2024) had already hinted at his mettle, rescuing India from 33/3 with Sarfaraz Khan. No centuries prior, but two fifties in limited opportunities speak to efficiency over extravagance. Jurel’s game is built on fundamentals: a compact defense, crisp drives, and an uncanny ability to rotate strike under duress. In the ongoing West Indies series, his square-of-the-wicket artistry—three boundaries in an over off seamers—showed flair without folly. Statistically, he’s unbeaten in four of his last six innings, with only 11 per cent dismissals to loose shots. Where Pant accelerates to 80+ scores then implodes, Jurel grinds to 40s and 50s, converting 60 per cent of them into bigger tallies. In an era of Bazball influences, Jurel’s old-school solidity—reminiscent of a young MS Dhoni—offers India the middle-order ballast Pant’s volatility disrupts.


Now, to the gloves, where the “Pant problem” truly festers. Pant’s keeping ledger in 50 Tests reads 132 dismissals: 115 catches and 17 stumpings, at a match average of 2.64 per game. His athleticism shines in seaming conditions—think those leaping one-handers in Sydney 2021—but lapses abound. In 2025 alone, he’s erred five times (dropped catches and byes), per Hawk-Eye reviews, costing wickets in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. His 13 per cent missed stumping rate against spin, exacerbated by over-aggression, has irked captains like Rohit Sharma.


Pant’s keeping, like his batting, is high-risk: brilliant when on, but prone to rust when fatigued or nursing niggles. Jurel, conversely, is a study in reliability. In his six Tests, he’s claimed 18 dismissals—16 catches, two stumpings—for a stellar 3.0 per match. No errors recorded in 2025 outings, with a 100 per cent sharp-keeping rate in the West Indies Test. His footwork is textbook: low, balanced, and anticipatory, allowing him to pouch edges off pacers like Jason Holder with ease. Against spin, Jurel’s stumpings are surgical—two in Ranchi alone, outfoxing England’s Ollie Pope. At 5’11”, he’s not the tallest, but his soft hands and quick reflexes minimise byes (under 5 per cent of overs kept). Mentored by Dhoni in IPL, Jurel’s visualisation techniques—admitted post his century—keep him “always ready,” translating to fewer fluffs under lights or on wearers. In a team rotating keepers amid Pant’s absences (he’s missed eight Tests since 2023), Jurel’s error-free ledger builds trust, freeing bowlers like Jasprit Bumrah to attack without second-guessing.


So, why Jurel as the solution? India’s Test campaign hinges on lower-order resilience, not fireworks. Pant, now 28, embodies the chaos of youth; his IPL 2025 struggles (average 12.8, strike rate 99) bleed into red-ball doubts. Jurel, with his 53 average and glove-gold standard, addresses both facets holistically. He’s not Pant’s heir in bravado, but in balance. Give him 20 Tests, and watch India reclaim the keeper’s throne—not with sizzle, but with substance.


(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page