top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Fatal Privilege

An avoidable death in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) has exposed the grotesque inversion of priorities that defines Indian governance. In Ambernath, a patient’s life ebbed away as an ambulance stood waiting not for a citizen, but for a politician who happened to be Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde. The vehicle, belonging to Chhaya Sub-District Hospital, had been dispatched for the Deputy CM’s visit to inaugurate a local theatre named in memory of Shinde’s mentor, late Shiv Sena leader Anand Dighe.


The family of a critically-ill resident, who needed to be moved to a larger facility for advanced treatment, found, to their consternation that there were none available. The only one that was had been commandeered for ‘VIP duty.’ As neighbours scrambled to find alternative transport, precious minutes slipped away and the patient ultimately died before help could arrive.


This is a scene that has been replayed not just across Maharashtra but across India with chilling regularity. The grim message it seems to send out is that the State’s apparatus bends not toward its citizens, but toward its political masters. An ambulance is a symbol of any State’s most basic promise which is to save lives. In Ambernath, that promise was broken for the sake of a ribbon-cutting.


What makes this incident more infuriating is that it occurred at a hospital already tarnished by scandal. Only a few years ago, sixteen patients there were reportedly administered the wrong injections. That such a facility could again become the site of negligence, this time compounded by political servility, suggests that inquiry committees are hollow rituals designed to quell justified public anger.


While Shinde certainly did not have personally ordered the ambulance’s diversion, the ruling Mahayuti administration bears responsibility for the culture that enabled it. In Maharashtra, as elsewhere in India, a ‘VIP movement’ has become a regrettable euphemism for the suspension of ordinary life. Often, traffic is halted at the expense of the citizens whom politicians are sworn to serve. Citizens are treated as obstacles, not constituents.


That a person dies because the state’s ambulance was reserved for a man inaugurating a theatre should shame every public servant who has ever signed off on such misuse of public resources. Yet, if history is any guide, the inquiry will conclude quietly, the officials will be reshuffled and the news cycle will move on. The only thing certain to remain unchanged is the hierarchy of privilege.


If India wishes to call itself a welfare state, it must first dismantle its feudal reflexes. Public hospitals cannot be treated as logistical wings of political events. Ambulances must never be diverted for ceremonial duties. Above all, accountability must travel upward, towards those in positions of authority who permit such dereliction to occur.


This death was a consequence of a system where life has become a dispensable prop. Until that changes, India’s hospitals will continue to serve power before patients.

Comments


bottom of page