top of page

By:

Anil D. Salve

21 March 2026 at 2:41:09 pm

Why Generation Z Refuses TO Be Silenced

We often complain that today's youth are difficult to understand. Perhaps the real problem, however, is not Generation Z-it is our inability to communicate with them. Instead of learning how they think, speak, and engage with the world, we often expect them to fit into frameworks created by previous generations. Generation Z is among the most informed, courageous, and globally connected generations in history. Born into the age of the internet and social media, they have grown up with...

Why Generation Z Refuses TO Be Silenced

We often complain that today's youth are difficult to understand. Perhaps the real problem, however, is not Generation Z-it is our inability to communicate with them. Instead of learning how they think, speak, and engage with the world, we often expect them to fit into frameworks created by previous generations. Generation Z is among the most informed, courageous, and globally connected generations in history. Born into the age of the internet and social media, they have grown up with instant access to information and diverse perspectives. They are aware not only of events in India but also of developments across the world-from Iran and the United States to Nigeria, Europe, and beyond. This global exposure has shaped a generation that is confident, informed, and willing to express its opinions. Yet they are frequently judged by outdated standards. Rather than trying to understand their aspirations, their language, and their methods of communication, many continue to measure them by the expectations of an earlier era. This is where the disconnect begins. Generation Z has developed a new language of civic and political expression-one that traditional institutions have often struggled to understand. To engage meaningfully with this generation, we must first learn this new language instead of dismissing it. Recent events have demonstrated how a seemingly simple demand can evolve into a broader movement centred on justice, accountability, freedom, and democratic values. When young people feel unheard or misunderstood, their concerns naturally expand into deeper questions about governance and the systems that shape their lives. This is no longer a phenomenon confined to one city or one state. Across Maharashtra and throughout India, young people are actively participating in conversations about democracy, public policy, and social change. Many who once remained indifferent to politics now believe that governance directly affects their education, employment, rights, and future. One of the greatest mistakes society can make is to underestimate this generation. They are digitally connected, socially aware, and capable of mobilising support within hours. Their movements are often driven not by political parties but by shared experiences, collective concerns, and a strong sense of justice. Unlike previous generations, Generation Z communicates through humour, satire, memes, and social media. These are not merely forms of entertainment; they have become powerful tools for political expression, civic engagement, and questioning authority. History has repeatedly shown that confident leadership welcomes criticism, while insecurity often responds with fear. Perhaps the most striking characteristic of this generation is its refusal to be governed by fear. Earlier generations often remained silent because they feared losing their jobs, facing social consequences, or inviting trouble. Increasingly, Generation Z believes that silence is no longer an acceptable response to injustice. This generation has found its voice, forged its identity, and developed the confidence to participate in public life. It understands that individual well-being cannot be separated from the well-being of society. If injustice is ignored today because it affects someone else, it may eventually affect everyone. India has witnessed numerous social movements throughout its history. What distinguishes many contemporary youth movements is that they are largely youth-led, digitally organised, and focused not only on immediate grievances but also on broader structural reforms rooted in fairness, transparency, accountability, and equal opportunity. Digital platforms have played a transformative role in this process. For Generation Z, social media is far more than a communication tool-it is a platform for building communities, organising campaigns, sharing information, and amplifying voices. Young people no longer feel isolated because they know that thousands of others stand with them, regardless of geographical distance. Equally inspiring is the compassion demonstrated by many young participants in public movements. Reports of volunteers organising food, supporting fellow participants, and even extending assistance to police personnel highlight that these movements are driven not only by resistance but also by empathy, solidarity, and a sense of shared responsibility. Their methods may be modern, but their values remain timeless. The future of India increasingly rests in the hands of a generation that is globally connected, socially conscious, technologically empowered, and unafraid to question injustice. Whether one agrees with every demand they raise or not, one reality is impossible to ignore: Generation Z has found its voice. Instead of attempting to silence, stereotype, or dismiss them, society must choose to listen, engage, and learn. Every generation reshapes the future in its own way. This generation has chosen courage over fear, participation over silence, and hope over indifference. (The writer is the Principal of Podar International School, Ausa, Latur. Views personal.)

From 'Vishwaguru' to Middle Power

The ongoing tensions involving the United States, Israel and Iran are more than a routine geopolitical crisis; they offer a clear view of how power operates in the international system. For India, this moment provides a sobering perspective. While the country increasingly speaks of its role as a “Vishwaguru” (global guide), the reality is more measured-India continues to function as a middle power, adapting to global shifts rather than directing them.


A key reason lies in India’s deep dependence on West Asia. A significant share of its energy imports originates from this region, much of it passing through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. Any instability there quickly translates into higher fuel costs, supply uncertainties and broader economic pressures at home. In such situations, India does not influence the course of events; instead, it responds to their consequences.


This imbalance-being affected without being able to shape outcomes-is a defining characteristic of a middle power. India’s diplomatic response to the crisis reflects this reality. Rather than taking a firm position, it has maintained a careful balance, mindful of its relationships with multiple stakeholders. Its strategic partnership with the United States, defence cooperation with Israel, and longstanding energy and connectivity interests with Iran make outright alignment difficult. Often described as “strategic autonomy,” this approach provides flexibility, but it also highlights a limitation: India must prioritise caution because it lacks the leverage to determine how events unfold.


In effect, it manages risks more than it defines directions. The economic dimension further reinforces this position. Conflicts of this nature tend to disrupt oil markets, unsettle trade routes and trigger volatility in financial systems-all of which directly impact India. Despite being one of the world’s largest economies, it does not yet possess the capacity to fully shield itself from such external shocks or to independently secure its interests during crises. Unlike major powers, it cannot decisively influence the trajectory of conflicts or stabilise regions critical to its national interests.


Moral Leadership

At the same time, India has sought to project moral leadership on the global stage, emphasising dialogue, peace and cooperation. While this enhances its international image, moments of conflict test not only principles but also the ability to act decisively. In the present situation, the principal actors are shaping events according to their strategic priorities, while India’s role remains largely supportive-focused on safeguarding its citizens and limiting economic fallout. Even in a region where it has deep historical and economic ties, its influence remains constrained. Recognising India as a middle power should not be viewed negatively. Such nations often play constructive roles by maintaining balance, engaging with diverse partners and avoiding overreach.


India’s approach fits this pattern, enabling it to navigate a complex global environment with a degree of flexibility. However, there remains a clear distinction between aspiration and capability. The idea of being a “Vishwaguru” implies not only moral authority but also the material strength and strategic reach to shape global developments-an area where India is still evolving. Moving beyond this stage will require sustained effort. Reducing dependence on external energy sources, strengthening economic resilience, expanding defence and strategic capabilities, and taking greater initiative in regional affairs are essential steps. Progress in these areas would gradually enhance India’s ability to influence outcomes rather than merely adapt to them.


For now, the ongoing crisis serves as a reminder that global stature is built as much on tangible capacity as on vision. India’s trajectory is undoubtedly forward-moving, but it remains a work in progress. In a rapidly changing world, the country stands as a pragmatic middle power-ambitious in outlook, yet grounded in the realities it must navigate.


(The writer is the Principal of Podar International School, Ausa, Latur. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page