top of page

By:

Abhijit Joshi

31 August 2024 at 10:09:24 am

A Walkover in Maharashtra

Unopposed victories and opposition withdrawals reveal the widening gap between Mahayuti’s organisational muscle and the MVA’s fading grassroots strength. As Maharashtra heads towards the Legislative Council elections for 17 Local Authorities Constituency seats on June 18, the political narrative appears to have been settled even before a single vote is cast. A supposedly keen contest between the ruling Mahayuti alliance and the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) has instead become a...

A Walkover in Maharashtra

Unopposed victories and opposition withdrawals reveal the widening gap between Mahayuti’s organisational muscle and the MVA’s fading grassroots strength. As Maharashtra heads towards the Legislative Council elections for 17 Local Authorities Constituency seats on June 18, the political narrative appears to have been settled even before a single vote is cast. A supposedly keen contest between the ruling Mahayuti alliance and the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) has instead become a demonstration of the ruling coalition’s growing dominance and the opposition's shrinking political confidence. The most striking feature of this election is not merely the numerical advantage enjoyed by the Mahayuti but the apparent unwillingness of the opposition to mount a serious challenge. Tame Opposition With seven Mahayuti-backed candidates reportedly elected unopposed and several opposition-supported candidates withdrawing from the race, the election has turned into a veritable consolidation of political power. The Maharashtra Legislative Council, or the Upper House consists of 78 members elected through a complex system involving MLAs, local authorities, graduates, teachers, and gubernatorial nominations. The current election concerns 17 seats elected by members of local self-government bodies such as municipal corporations, municipal councils, district councils, and panchayat institutions. Consequently, organizational strength at the grassroots level matters far more than public rallies or social media campaigns. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has approached these elections with remarkable organizational discipline. After securing a dominant position in local bodies across large parts of Maharashtra, the party has successfully translated its electoral gains into institutional control. Under the final seat-sharing arrangement, BJP is contesting 11 of the 17 seats, while Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena has been allotted four seats and Deputy Chief Minister Sunetra Pawar’s Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) two seats. The distribution reflects the BJP’s position as the undisputed senior partner within the ruling alliance. What is noteworthy is the confidence with which the alliance has managed candidate selection and coalition management. Despite occasional rebellions and disgruntled aspirants, the leadership has largely succeeded in containing dissent before it could affect the electoral outcome. The Mahayuti’s strength stems from years of political expansion at the local level. Municipal councillors, Zilla Parishad members, Panchayat Samiti representatives, and other elected local body members form the electorate in these contests. Over the past decade, BJP has systematically expanded its footprint in these institutions, often at the expense of traditional regional parties. If the Mahayuti enters the election from a position of strength, the Maha Vikas Aghadi enters it carrying the burden of uncertainty. The MVA eventually agreed on a seat-sharing formula under which Congress is contesting eight seats, Shiv Sena (UBT) four seats, and Sharad Pawar’s NCP three seats, while negotiations continued in a few constituencies until the last minute. Shrinking Influence However, the larger issue confronting the MVA is not seat-sharing but shrinking influence within local self-government institutions. Many of the local bodies that form the electoral college were elected years ago when political equations were vastly different. Since then, Maharashtra has witnessed major political realignments, including the splits in the Shiv Sena and the Nationalist Congress Party. These developments significantly weakened the organizational network of the Opposition. As a result, several constituencies that once appeared competitive now heavily favour Mahayuti candidates. The Opposition’s cautious approach reflects an uncomfortable reality that in many constituencies, the numbers simply do not support an aggressive contest. The withdrawal of candidates in several constituencies has paved the way for multiple Mahayuti nominees to secure victory without a contest. While uncontested elections are not uncommon in indirect polls, the scale witnessed this year is unique. Democracy thrives on contestation. Elections are not merely mechanisms to determine winners; they are opportunities to test ideas and hold those in power accountable. When opposition parties are unable - or unwilling - to field serious challengers, the democratic process risks becoming a procedural exercise rather than a genuine political contest. By avoiding direct contests, the Opposition risks reinforcing the perception that the battle has already been lost. Despite the Mahayuti’s overall advantage, a few constituencies remain politically significant. Thane, Pune, Raigad, Satara, Nashik, Nanded and Amravati have witnessed intense negotiations and local-level negotiation. In some seats, internal dissatisfaction within the ruling alliance has produced rebel candidates. In Nashik, Pune, Raigad and Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, disagreements over ticket distribution had briefly threatened to disrupt alliance calculations. Similarly, in Amravati and Yavatmal, local leaders had expressed unhappiness over candidate selection. However, unlike previous elections where such rebellions could have altered outcomes, the Mahayuti leadership appears confident of containing the damage through political negotiations and organizational discipline. Beyond the immediate electoral results, the 2026 Legislative Council elections carry a broader political significance. The elections are serving as a barometer of Maharashtra’s changing political landscape. They underline the extent to which BJP has emerged as the central pole of state politics, capable not only of winning elections but also of managing alliances, controlling local institutions and shaping electoral outcomes long before polling day. For the MVA, the elections offer a sobering reminder that electoral alliances alone are insufficient. Without rebuilding grassroots networks and strengthening local organizational structures, the Opposition will continue to struggle against a ruling coalition that enjoys both numerical superiority and institutional control. As Maharashtra prepares for voting on June 18, the more important question is whether the Opposition can rediscover the political confidence necessary to challenge the ruling alliance in future battles. For now, the Mahayuti’s march appears unstoppable, while the Opposition fights to stay politically relevant. (The writer is a political observer. Views personal.)

Growing Risks Of Cyber Warfare

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

In a shocking series of events, multiple coordinated explosions have rocked Lebanon and parts of Syria, killing dozens of people and injuring thousands. The blasts occurred after explosive devices, hidden inside pagers and other radio communication devices, were detonated. The targeted individuals were primarily members of Hezbollah, with the explosions taking place in densely populated areas, resulting in widespread injuries to civilians, including children.

The devices, mainly pagers, walkie-talkies, and radios, had been in the possession of Hezbollah operatives, who had acquired them months prior, under the assumption they were secure. However, Hezbollah has accused Israel’s intelligence agency, Shin Bet, of tampering with the devices during transit.

According to security experts, Israel’s elite secret cyber warfare unit was behind the attack. This unit, known for its global cyber operations, is also linked to the creation of the STUXnet malware, which was responsible for the failure of Iran’s nuclear power plant. The pagers were rigged with explosive materials in place of a battery, and a relay switch was installed, allowing the explosions to be triggered remotely in a synchronized manner. The result was devastating injuries to the eyes, face, hands, and legs of those carrying the devices.

The incident occurred in Hezbollah-stronghold areas, including the Dahieh suburb of Beirut, southern Lebanon, and parts of the Beqaa Valley, with some explosions also reported across the border in Syria. The blasts overwhelmed hospitals, as hundreds of victims sought medical help for injuries ranging from severe burns to shattered limbs. The intensity of the explosions, far beyond that of ordinary battery malfunctions, indicates a highly sophisticated sabotage operation.

These explosions have not only deepened the crisis in Lebanon but have also raised critical questions about supply chain security, intelligence tactics, and the legality of using booby-trapped electronics in conflict zones.


What Are Pagers, and Why Are They Still Preferred?

Despite being old-school tele communication technology, pagers or beepers are still used in many countries, particularly in critical sectors and organizations. Pagers primarily facilitate one-way communication, pager uses higher frequencies than car radios i.e. 400 MHz band frequency. It also used a very basic type of VHF spectrum. These devices operate in restricted areas to transfer messages, alerts, and information. These devices are considered more secure and harder to trace or track compared to mobile phones, as they only receive messages, similar to a car radio that receives signals without revealing the listener’s identity or location. Additionally, pagers lack features like Bluetooth or GPS, making them more difficult to hack or compromise.

Among their many advantages, pagers are known for their long battery life and durability, making them ideal for continuous use in specific industries. There are an estimated two million active pager users worldwide. Hezbollah began using pagers after Israel successfully assassinated a high-ranking Hezbollah target by hacking his cellphone and precisely targeting him with a missile. Since then, many Hezbollah members have switched to more primitive communication devices, like pagers, to avoid being tracked via the internet.


Are Mobile Phones and Smartphones Similarly Vulnerable?

American and European security agencies suggest that, theoretically, it is possible to alter mobile phones and other smart devices to turn them into explosive devices. However, practically, it is more difficult due to the advanced security systems in modern smartphones. A hacked smartphone may exhibit various signs, such as abnormal temperature changes, slower system performance, unexpected reboots, odd sounds during calls, hung applications, or irrelevant messages and pop-ups, all of which could indicate tampering. These security systems make it more challenging to modify smartphones in the same manner as simpler devices like pagers.


New Security Challenges

The Hezbollah pager explosion serves as a wake-up call for sectors involving critical infrastructure and aviation. In an era where smartphones are network-connected and can be charged wirelessly, the possibility of tampering with batteries or embedding explosives, like HMX, PETN and other type of plastic explosives pose significant risks. During flights, even a minor explosion could result in catastrophic consequences. On the ground, the threat extends to damaging nearby aircraft, equipment, and infrastructure. Airport security may soon impose stricter regulations, potentially banning pagers, walkie-talkies, and radios, much like power banks, which are now restricted on flights. In the future, mobile phones may only be allowed in switched-off modes, placed in lithium-safe bags during flights. Suspicious devices could be handled separately in Faraday-sheet bags to block any network or signal connections.

This incident highlights the growing risks of cyber warfare and the dangers posed by everyday communication devices being exploited for sabotage. It is an alarming call for a nation’s security as the treat of such critical infrastructure being handled by terrorist organisations can compromise the use of day-to-day electronics for malicious activities. As technology advances, so must the protocols for ensuring public safety, particularly in high-risk environments where even the smallest vulnerability could lead to devastating consequences.

(The writer is an eminent cyber and explosives forensic expert. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page