top of page

By:

Sayli Gadakh

11 November 2025 at 2:53:14 pm

Why Rs 1 Crore May Not Be Enough for Retirement

For most middle-class Indians, Rs 1 crore is a retirement milestone — but it may not be enough Bharat, 35, has a stable job, a growing income and a clear plan for the future. Discussing retirement with a friend, he says, “If I have Rs 1 crore by the time I retire, I’ll be financially secure.” For many middle-class Indians, Rs 1 crore remains a major financial milestone. But Bharath is not retiring today. If he retires at 60, his target is 25 years away, and inflation could significantly...

Why Rs 1 Crore May Not Be Enough for Retirement

For most middle-class Indians, Rs 1 crore is a retirement milestone — but it may not be enough Bharat, 35, has a stable job, a growing income and a clear plan for the future. Discussing retirement with a friend, he says, “If I have Rs 1 crore by the time I retire, I’ll be financially secure.” For many middle-class Indians, Rs 1 crore remains a major financial milestone. But Bharath is not retiring today. If he retires at 60, his target is 25 years away, and inflation could significantly reduce its purchasing power. Many retirement plans fail because they focus on a future number without considering what it will buy. If inflation averages 6% over 25 years, something costing Rs 1 lakh today could cost roughly Rs 4.3 lakh when Bharat retires. Rs 1 crore could therefore support a very different standard of living. Longer Retirements Earlier generations often relied on pensions, provident funds, family support and savings. That model is changing. Many private-sector employees may have no traditional pension, while longer life expectancy means savings may need to last 20 or 30 years. If Bharat retires at 60 and lives to 90, his corpus could have to support him for three decades. Retirement planning must therefore focus on sustainable income, not simply accumulation. Bharat currently spends Rs 60,000 a month. He expects expenses to fall after retirement as his children become independent and his home loan is paid off. But healthcare, insurance, medicines, household help, travel and lifestyle costs could rise. At 6% inflation, Rs 60,000 today would equal about Rs 2.58 lakh a month in 25 years. The Rs 1 crore target suddenly looks less comfortable. Health And Tax Bharat may have employer-provided health insurance while working but could lose it after retirement, just as healthcare needs increase. His plan should include health insurance, emergency and contingency funds, medical expenses and possible long-term care. Simply investing more is not necessarily the answer. At 35, Bharath has a long investment horizon and may be able to take greater investment risk, depending on his circumstances and risk capacity. As retirement approaches, capital preservation and liquidity become more important. Tax planning is also crucial. Interest income, capital gains, pension income and withdrawals may have different tax implications. With India’s Income-tax Act, 2025 coming into effect from 1 April 2026, long-term plans should be reviewed against the applicable tax framework. The key question is not, “How much will my investment statement show?” but, “What will my corpus be worth after inflation and taxation?” Look Beyond Property Bharat owns a house worth Rs 2 crore, but that does not mean Rs 2 crore is available for retirement. A house provides security and may appreciate, but its value cannot easily fund monthly expenses without changing living arrangements or using a financial product to unlock it. Retirement planning must therefore distinguish between net worth and income-generating assets. Instead of choosing Rs 1 crore as a target, Bharath should work backwards, considering current and future expenses, retirement duration, inflation, healthcare, other goals, investment returns and taxes. The real question is: “How much will I need to maintain my desired lifestyle without depending on my children?” Start Early Bharat’s biggest advantage at 35 is time. Compounding over 25 years can produce a dramatically different outcome from investing for only 10 years. A middle-class family does not need to start with a huge investment. It needs discipline and consistency. As income rises, retirement contributions should rise too, rather than allowing salary increases to disappear into lifestyle expenses. A practical plan should estimate future expenses, account for inflation, maintain a separate emergency fund, provide adequate health and life insurance, diversify investments and consider tax implications. It should also be reviewed as income, inflation, tax rules and family responsibilities change. Bharat now asks, “What lifestyle do I want after retirement, and how much will I need to fund it?” He starts investing early, increases contributions with salary hikes, controls debt and reviews his corpus regularly. He may ultimately need considerably more than Rs 1 crore. More importantly, he understands why. For today’s middle class, retirement planning cannot be based on a number that simply sounds impressive. Rs 1 crore may have been a significant milestone for an earlier generation, but inflation, healthcare costs, longer life expectancy and taxation could dramatically change what it provides decades from now. Retirement security depends not just on the corpus, but on its purchasing power and sustainable income. The lesson is simple: don’t ask, “Will I have Rs 1 crore?” Ask, “Will my retirement savings fund the life I want?” A large number today may not be enough tomorrow. (The writer is a Chartered Accountant based in Thane. Views personal.)

Hollow Hearts

Pune has long cultivated an image of itself as Maharashtra’s cultural and educational capital. Yet, the alleged murder of a young businessman by his fiancée and her lover at Lohagad Fort reveals a darker reality that beneath the city’s polished image lies a growing culture of selfishness, emotional emptiness and moral decay.


According to police investigations, what initially appeared to be a tragic trekking accident has been revealed as a carefully planned killing. The victim was allegedly pushed into a gorge by his fiancée and her lover. The details are chilling not merely because of the violence involved, but because of the cold calculation that appears to underpin it. The shocking part is that the victim was not allegedly targeted by strangers or enemies, but by someone who was due to be his life partner.


The victim’s father’s, suspecting a bigger conspiracy, has said his son now appears to have been targeted on previous occasions.


A society functions on the assumption that bonds of affection, loyalty and commitment still matter. When those bonds are betrayed with such apparent ease, the damage extends far beyond a single crime.


Previous generations in Pune, for all their imperfections, tended to view courtship, marriage and family obligations through the lens of duty as much as desire. Commitments were not always honoured, but they were generally regarded as sacred. Today, among sections of the urban middle class, a more transactional ethic appears to be taking hold. Individual fulfilment is elevated above every other consideration and fidelity is seen less as a virtue than as a lifestyle choice.


Modern India is witnessing unprecedented prosperity. Cities like Pune have transformed from sleepy educational centres into hubs of real estate, information technology and consumption. While prosperity has expanded opportunities that previous generations could scarcely imagine, rising wealth has regrettably become the sole measure of worth.



The Lohagad case is not entirely isolated from broader trends visible in the city. In recent years Pune has repeatedly found itself in the headlines for reasons that sit uneasily with its self-image. Reckless displays of privilege, rising criminality among affluent youth and a growing sense that money can bend rules have all tarnished the city's reputation. The Porsche crash that outraged the nation became a symbol of entitlement unconstrained by responsibility. The Lohagad case, though very different in its particulars, speaks to a similar malaise of the weakening of moral limits.


The tragedy at Lohagad should be seen as more than a lurid crime story. It is a warning about a city, and perhaps a country, in which material advancement has outpaced moral reflection. Pune’s greatest challenge today is not managing growth. It is preserving the values that once gave meaning to that growth.

Comments


bottom of page