top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Humble Colossus

Updated: Oct 22, 2024

Ratan Tata, who passed away at 86, was a man who spoke in the measured tones of a diplomat and moved with the quiet grace of a statesman. His impact on India’s industrial landscape was seismic. He wasn’t one for bombast, despite commanding one of the world’s most sprawling conglomerates. This reserved and unassuming leader of the Tata Group led with a sense of dignity and responsibility that increasingly feels like a relic of another age. His death marks not just the proverbial end of an era but the departure of a figure whose rare combination of ambition and humility is difficult to imagine being replicated.


For four decades, Tata guided his family’s company through turbulent waters, not only expanding its reach but redefining what it meant to be an Indian multinational in a globalized world. In the 1990s, as India underwent economic liberalization, many business leaders were uncertain about handling the surge of foreign competition. But Tata saw a different horizon. His acquisitions - Tetley Tea, Corus Steel, and the crown jewel, Jaguar Land Rover - were statements of intent. It proved that India was not just opening its doors to the world, but was ready to claim a seat at the table.


Ratan Tata’s ascent to the helm of Tata Group in 1991 marked a turning point for the group’s business. He transformed the centuries-old, largely domestic conglomerate into a global titan, shaping both the company and India’s economic history Yet, unlike many of his contemporaries, Tata did not appear to lust after power or wealth for its own sake. He understood that the true measure of a corporation was not just its profits, but its purpose.


This sense of corporate responsibility permeated the Tata Group under his stewardship. The Tata trusts, which control a significant portion of the conglomerate, were channelled into education, healthcare and social welfare, long before such initiatives became de rigueur among global corporations. Ratan Tata’s vision of business extended beyond immediate returns. He did not just want to make money - he wanted to build a better India.


In a country where corruption often festers in the corridors of business and politics, Tata stood apart. He was, by all accounts, incorruptible. His refusal to bow to the demands for bribes in the early days of his airline venture was one of the more publicized examples of his moral code, but it was emblematic of a larger ethos that shaped the Tata Group. In the often-unscrupulous world of Indian business, where backroom deals and political patronage are part of the game, Tata’s integrity was legendary. He was a man who did not waver, even when it would have been easier to compromise. His legacy will not be found in gilded skyscrapers or flashy acquisitions, but in the livelihoods improved by Tata’s social initiatives, in the global respect won for Indian business, and in the ideals of corporate governance he upheld until the very end.

Comments


bottom of page