top of page

By:

Bharati Dubey

17 May 2026 at 1:38:10 am

After Don-3 controversy, Ranveer’s next film goes on floors

Mumbai: After months of attention surrounding his reported exit from Don 3, Ranveer Singh has finally moved on to his next major cinematic venture. The actor’s ambitious survival spectacle Pralay has officially gone on floors in Mumbai today, marking the beginning of filming on one of the most ambitious and scale-driven projects in Indian cinema. Headlined by Ranveer Singh and directed by Jai Mehta, Pralay is an original end-of-the-world action thriller that promises to take audiences into a...

After Don-3 controversy, Ranveer’s next film goes on floors

Mumbai: After months of attention surrounding his reported exit from Don 3, Ranveer Singh has finally moved on to his next major cinematic venture. The actor’s ambitious survival spectacle Pralay has officially gone on floors in Mumbai today, marking the beginning of filming on one of the most ambitious and scale-driven projects in Indian cinema. Headlined by Ranveer Singh and directed by Jai Mehta, Pralay is an original end-of-the-world action thriller that promises to take audiences into a world on the brink of annihilation. Produced by Ananya Birla’s Birla Studios, Hansal Mehta and Sahil Saigal’s True Story Films, and Maa Kasam Films, the film combines large-scale spectacle with a deeply human story of survival, courage and the instinct to fight for what matters most. The film marks Ranveer’s next major motion picture following Dhurandhar and Dhurandhar – The Revenge, which emerged as the highest-grossing film of all time. With Pralay, the actor once again ventures into unexplored cinematic territory, taking on a disruptive new concept that demands both physical intensity and emotional conviction. Ranveer will also serve as a producer on the film. The project comes at an important point in the actor’s career. His reported exit from Don 3 had generated considerable buzz, particularly as he was expected to carry forward one of Indian cinema’s most iconic franchises. With Pralay, Ranveer now turns the page with an entirely original story rather than stepping into another established universe. Joining him is Lokah breakout actress Kalyani Priyadarshan, who plays a pivotal role in the film and brings together another exciting performer from the new generation of Indian talent. For Ananya Birla, Pralay represents Birla Studios’ ambition to push the boundaries of mainstream Indian cinema by collaborating with contemporary creative forces. For True Story Films’ Hansal Mehta and Sahil Saigal, the project reflects their commitment to disruptive storytelling and content-driven cinema. Behind the camera, Jai Mehta leads the ambitious project. His work on Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story, which he co-directed with Hansal Mehta, and Lootere has earned widespread acclaim. With Pralay, he steps into a significantly larger canvas, bringing together an ensemble of creative and technical talent from India and around the world. Set against the unmistakable pulse and landscape of Mumbai, Pralay follows a relentless journey of survival against the terrifying possibility of an end-of-the-world catastrophe. The film aims to marry breathtaking spectacle with an emotional core, exploring what people are willing to do to survive when the world as they know it begins to collapse. The makers are shooting extensively at live locations in and around Mumbai, embracing the physicality and unpredictability of real-world environments. The approach is designed to add scale, texture and realism to the apocalyptic world while creating an immersive theatrical experience. The film had already undergone several months of highly technical and intensive pre-production before cameras began rolling. Its ambitious mounting and unusual premise have made Pralay one of the most talked-about upcoming projects in Indian cinema.

In Quick Commerce We Trust: Welcome to the Ministry of Instant Gratification

We wanted groceries in 10 minutes. Instead, we got an identity crisis with free delivery.

Respectful public discourse isn’t exactly woven into our fabric, but a provocative photo has divided the country yet again. This time, it is Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal asking us about the price of convenience and rest assured, he’s not alone. I used to wonder who needs groceries in 10 minutes, but that was before I was seduced by the 10-minute grocery charm or racket (depending on how you see it).


Q-commerce has showcased innovations in logistics, tech-human behavioural exchanges, and retail space optimisation. But it isn’t just about getting your eggs in 10 minutes. It’s about what you’re trading off - choice, control, common sense? - that’s making us vulnerable to this irresistible impulse.


Q-commerce was not invented in India but it may be one of the few markets where it is still functional. Many Western countries have tried with varying degrees of success and failure to keep those boats afloat. Even China has some, but we’d be fools to compare India and China. Suffice to say, it is no piece of cake.


To use present-day terminology, Q-commerce is a service you didn’t know you needed until you used it. Minister Goyal’s intentions may or may not have been to evoke an emotional response, but its implications go much deeper than the startup ecosystem into a country that’s drifting where the VC money takes us. And somebody has to wake us up from our Pavlovian reveries. But before pointing any fingers, let’s look at what it reveals about us as a society.


Q-commerce can be dubbed as an optimised way to have groceries at your doorstep. Riding on the tail of the Covid pandemic and digital penetration combined with UPI, it drives one to spend more alongside increasing short-term consumption. To the untrained eye, this may appear like a good micro-economic sign, but scratch the surface and it smells more like a sugar high.


For one, not all spending may be essential and could rack up debt for some. The normalisation of instant gratification could have retaliatory effects in other aspects of one’s life, but one won’t weep over spilled milk, because within 10 minutes, another packet would have arrived.


Even though we’re not necessarily list-making shoppers with a cart and trolley, many people are cognisant about stocking their kitchens with items that are more necessary than discretionary. Maybe it’s a generational thing. Millennials and Gen Z prefer convenience over planning, and they don’t want their deliveries with a grain of salt. They want icing.


On the surface level, it may seem like a good thing that people, especially from economically weaker backgrounds, are gaining employment. But as workers operating in a perpetual “grey zone” (are they employees, contractors or platforms’ favourite “partners”) when it comes to employment status, their working conditions and labour rights don’t exactly make sexy headlines — or any headlines. While this is the bed they have chosen, they don’t need to lie in it. Gig workers across the world continue to fight for their rights, and in India, even their dignity.


Work allocations are driven by technological algorithms, and problem solving a mere hum of the machine. Workers can be barred from the platform in a heartbeat due to customer complaints or tech glitches or really anything. Nobody can tell what’s in the black box of a platform’s tech IP. Additionally, have you ever seen a delivery person drive cautiously and/or follow traffic signals? There’s your pickle. Never mind the policy.


Speaking of pickles, it’s the local kirana store uncle or aunty picking up the cheques of this convenience. Not backed by venture capitalists for whom your mind is inaccessible and probably untameable to a certain extent (think cash transactions, freedom to choose items and their quantities, freedom of prices, variety of brands), the store cannot afford to give you a 50% discount. If you observe closely, you may see a clear distinction in the price of what you’re getting online and offline. Buying on Q-commerce means you lose choice and are now effectively trapped in an online retail monoculture in a country that’s anything but mono. And that value you were seeking for the buck you’re spending? That’s just bad apples.


We’ve not touched last-mile emissions, cold storage challenges, unit economics and the dismantling of urban infrastructure yet, but you may have an idea about where this is going. This is not a criticism of Q-commerce as much as it is a question: with no VC-backing, no technological innovations and little to no difference in the goods being sold, will Q-commerce survive 20 years down the line? Is it old wine in a new bottle, with hidden costs and delivery at neck-breaking speeds? What happens when there are disruptions to supply chains (Covid-19 anyone?) in an already fragile urban infrastructure with shaky economics?


When we have answers to these questions, maybe then, we can finally eat our cake without checking if it’s available for 50 percent off — or delivered in 10.


(The writer is an independent journalist with a keen interest in environmental issues and urban ecology)

Comments

bottom of page