Jan Suraaj chief Prashant Kishor’s emphatic victory in the Bankipur by-poll, that ended three decades of uninterrupted BJP dominance, is a classic instance when even the safest urban strongholds of a comfortably ensconced ruling party are no longer immune to local discontent and shifting social coalitions. That said, the parallels between Bankipur and the 2023 Kasba Peth bypoll are too striking to dismiss as isolated by-election quirks. In the latter case, the BJP had similarly conceded a seemingly surefire seat that had remained in its grasp since 1995. Both defeats followed the departure of long-serving legislators. Both occurred in constituencies where the BJP began as the overwhelming favourite. By-elections are notoriously unreliable predictors of general elections as their turnout is generally lower, and local grievances loom larger while voters often feel freer to register dissatisfaction without changing governments. Yet they remain valuable political barometers because they reveal the health of party organisations beneath the sheen of national leadership. Bankipur is especially significant because like Kasba Peth in Pune, it represented the party’s urban, upper-caste heartland in Bihar. Prashant Kishor’s victory, therefore, carries symbolism beyond its numerical margin. Making his electoral debut, he converted what had long been considered an impregnable BJP constituency into the Jan Suraaj Party’s most consequential victory. The explanation lies less in ideological realignment than in coalition management. The BJP has, in recent years, sought to broaden its social base by expanding its appeal among the lower caste, economically disadvantaged caste groups. That strategy has served it well nationally, particularly in states where expanding beyond traditional support was essential for electoral growth. Yet every expansion creates new anxieties among an established base. Just as in the Kasba bypoll, the Bankipur result suggests that sections of upper-caste voters, long regarded as among the BJP’s most dependable supporters, felt increasingly alienated. Their perception was that the BJP’s electoral calculations had shifted decisively towards cultivating newer caste constituencies. Kasba Peth offered an earlier version of the same lesson. The BJP entered the contest expecting organisational strength and historical advantage to outweigh local dissatisfaction. Instead, the opposition successfully transformed the by-election into a referendum on complacency, exploiting organisational fatigue and local resentment. Bankipur appears to follow a similar script. Candidate selection became contentious, local anti-incumbency lingered beneath the surface, and the opposition presented itself as the vehicle for voters seeking to send a message rather than engineer a regime change. While this, in no way, implies an imminent collapse of the BJP’s broader electoral dominance, dominant parties ignore by-election warnings at their peril. Safe seats are valuable not because they guarantee victories, but because they reveal the strength of a party’s deepest political relationships.
Comments