top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Legal notice threatens Sunetra’s NCP presidency

Mumbai: The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) is weathering a fresh political storm as newly elected National President and Deputy Chief Minister Sunetra Pawar faces a direct legal challenge to her leadership. Elevated to the top posts following the tragic accidental demise of former Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, Sunetra Pawar is now navigating a complex internal rebellion. A legal notice served by a senior party functionary demanding the annulment of her election has not only raised the...

Legal notice threatens Sunetra’s NCP presidency

Mumbai: The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) is weathering a fresh political storm as newly elected National President and Deputy Chief Minister Sunetra Pawar faces a direct legal challenge to her leadership. Elevated to the top posts following the tragic accidental demise of former Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, Sunetra Pawar is now navigating a complex internal rebellion. A legal notice served by a senior party functionary demanding the annulment of her election has not only raised the startling possibility of her having to step down from the presidency but has also ignited intense speculation among party insiders regarding who might truly be orchestrating this proxy battle from behind the scenes. The crisis was triggered on July 9 when Sachchidanand Singh, the NCP’s Jharkhand State President and a party veteran of 15 years, served a legal notice through his lawyer. Directed at Sunetra Pawar as party president, Praful Patel as working president, and Brijmohan Srivastava as party secretary, the notice claims that the February 26 election for the top post was fundamentally invalid and unconstitutional. Singh, who was appointed as National Secretary in December 2023 by the late Ajit Pawar but unceremoniously excluded from the new national executive committee, has demanded that the current election be scrapped and a fresh one be conducted under an independent and impartial election officer. Crucially, the notice demands that until a new election is held, Sunetra Pawar’s position and the revised list of office-bearers be considered null and void, a move that would effectively force her immediate ouster. Procedural Expose The legal challenge hinges on deep procedural technicalities that expose the fragile transition of power within the NCP. According to the notice, following Ajit Pawar’s demise on January 28, the party submitted an amended constitution to the Election Commission on February 17, vesting Praful Patel with the powers of the National President until a permanent leader was elected. Singh has questioned under what authority Brijmohan Srivastava convened the pivotal February 26 meeting instead of Patel. Furthermore, he alleged that consent from the then-national executive members was bypassed for crucial communications sent to the Election Commission on February 18. While the legalities are complex, the political implications are profound. The sheer audacity of the notice has set the rumor mills ablaze within the NCP, with party insiders quietly speculating whether Singh is acting independently out of personal grievance over his exclusion, or if he is acting as a frontline proxy for disgruntled heavyweight factions maneuvering for ultimate control of the party. Trivial Issue Amidst the brewing storm, the NCP’s top brass has attempted to project a picture of absolute unity while swiftly dismissing the rebellion. Senior party leader and NCP State President Sunil Tatkare sought to brush away the controversy, characterising the legal notice as a trivial issue completely devoid of factual or legal substance. Asserting that the election of ‘Vahini’ (Sunetra Pawar) was conducted with strict adherence to the party constitution, laws, and democratic norms, Tatkare emphasised that the opinion of a single disgruntled individual does not reflect systemic unrest within the larger organisation. He firmly stated that the party’s core committee would convene imminently to consult legal experts and take appropriate disciplinary decisions against those responsible for the notice. However, despite Tatkare’s confident efforts to downplay the crisis, the looming legal battle and the swirling internal suspicions pose a critical test for Sunetra Pawar’s nascent leadership at a highly vulnerable juncture for the party. “There is no rift in the party. All senior party leaders meet with Sunetra Pawar to discuss political issues. The letter written by Sachchidanand Singh carries no weight. Any issue should be resolved amicably in the interest of the party." Praful Patel, Leader, NCP

Knives out in legislature

Updated: Mar 21, 2025

Disha Salian

Mumbai: Death of celebrity manager Disha Salian in 2020 once again rocked the Maharashtra legislature on Thursday. While cabinet ministers Nitesh Rane and Shambhuraj Desai demanded that Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aditya Thackeray be arrested in the case, BJP MLA Amit Satam in the assembly and another BJP member Chitra Wagh in the council demanded that the report of SIT to probe Salian’s death be made public.


Incidentally, amidst repeated disruptions in both the houses, some members from the treasury benches were seen speaking in favour of Aditya Thackeray, while Shiv Sena (UBT) members like Adv Anil Parab were seen supporting the BJP members’ demand that the report of the SIT probe be made public. In addition, there were allegations and counter allegations and personal accusations among members from the treasury and opposition benches which led to heated debate on occasions.


The opposition termed the attempts from the treasury benches to link Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aditya Thackeray’s name in the case, as a ‘conspiracy’.


“I think this matter has gone to the court. We have no idea what he (Disha’s father) has said, but Aaditya Thackeray is a mature leader, a young leader. The Bharatiya Janata Party is conspiring to defame him by putting pressure on him. We don’t need to answer to this conspiracy. The court will answer,” Ambadas Danve said.


Earlier in the day, when the house gathered for the business, Minister of State for Home appraised the assembly of the status in this case. “SIT has been formed to probe in the case. Their report has not been received as yet. However, the government shall act according to directives from the court,” the minister told the house.


Another BJP minister Nitesh Rane, however, said that since Satish Salian has levelled allegations against an MVA minister, that leader be treated like a common person and that everybody should be treated equally before the law. Shiv Sena minister Shambhuraj Desai too supported the demand. “Since the allegations are grave, the person in question should be immediately arrested and the case be investigated,” he said.


Later, while speaking to media in the legislature premises, Rane asked Uddhav Thackeray to come clean on the issue. “If they say that we are politicizing the issue, Uddhav Thackeray should also tell the people why he had called, not just once but twice, to the then union minister Narayan Rane urging him to save his son?” Rane said.


He also accused the opposition of shying away from coming clean on the issue. “If they feel that we are not telling the truth, they should say so in the house. But they are shying away from doing so. Bhaskar Jadhav, who is always aggressive, was nowhere to be seen when this issue came up in the house. Sunil Prabhu too escaped the house under the pretext of a phone call. I challenge them to say that whatever I said on the issue is wrong,” Rane said.


He also said that Aditya Thackeray should resign on moral grounds till his name is cleared in the case.


BJP MLA Amit Satam demanded that the details of the SIT probe be made public so that the people would know if the probe is headed in right direction.


Interestingly, while the ruling parties were targeting the opposition in the case, senior BJP leader Sudhir Mungantiwar surprised all with his unexpected support to Thackerays. “I do not have any evidences in the case. But if her father has made any fresh allegations that needs to be investigated thoroughly. The assembly can discuss the issue at length tomorrow. In the meanwhile, members like Rane, who seem to have some evidences in the case should hand them over to the investigating agencies and help the probe,” he told the house.


Shiv Sena’s Sanjay Gaikwad and Sheetal Mhatre too toed the line and demanded that more and more evidences should come forth.


Similarly, when members of treasury benches were pushing for revealing the details of the probe till date to the public, Shiv Sena (UBT) member Anil Parab supported the demand. “Doing that shall conclusively prove the innocence of Aditya Thackeray,” he said.

Comments

bottom of page