top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Monsoon Malaise

The substantial showers over Maharashtra this year have predictably demonstrated that it is not the skies but the government that has failed the state. The intense downpour once again exposed the frailty of the infrastructure that the ruling establishment has been celebrating. From Mumbai’s paralysed roads to the shocking deaths in open manholes sans guardrails, to the collapse of transport links between Mumbai and Pune, the rains have held up an unforgiving mirror to official complacency....

Monsoon Malaise

The substantial showers over Maharashtra this year have predictably demonstrated that it is not the skies but the government that has failed the state. The intense downpour once again exposed the frailty of the infrastructure that the ruling establishment has been celebrating. From Mumbai’s paralysed roads to the shocking deaths in open manholes sans guardrails, to the collapse of transport links between Mumbai and Pune, the rains have held up an unforgiving mirror to official complacency. For a city that witnesses monsoons every year, Mumbai’s monsoon paralysis can scarcely be described as inevitable. Roads have disappeared beneath the floodwaters and commuters have been left stranded. These are not natural disasters but administrative failures. The Pune-Mumbai Expressway, the state’s most important transport corridor, was partially shut after a concrete pillar fell near the newly inaugurated Missing Link section. Opened barely two months ago, the 13-km engineering showcase was presented as a symbol of Maharashtra’s modern infrastructure ambitions. It promised shorter travel times and smoother connectivity through the Sahyadris. Instead, the first meaningful encounter with the monsoon has raised uncomfortable questions over the quality of execution. Was there a comprehensive structural assessment of the project before it was opened? Were engineers confident that it could withstand the very weather conditions for which such infrastructure is designed? These are not partisan questions to be merely asked by the Opposition, but matters of public safety. More worrying is the cascading effect of these failures. With the Missing Link closed, the old Mumbai-Pune highway disrupted and Tamhini Ghat also rendered unusable, connectivity between Maharashtra’s political and commercial capitals has been severely compromised. Legislators themselves reportedly face uncertainty over reaching Mumbai for the ongoing Assembly session. If the state’s elected representatives struggle to move across Maharashtra, one can only imagine the plight of ordinary citizens whose livelihoods depend on functioning roads, reliable transport and basic civic services. Infrastructure earns its reputation during crises, not during inaugurations. Roads are built for rainy days and bridges are meant to withstand storms. Drainage systems exist precisely because monsoons are neither rare nor unexpected. Maharashtra has not been surprised by an eclipse or an earthquake. It has been visited by the same seasonal rains that return with remarkable punctuality every year. Invoking climate change cannot become an alibi for poor planning, weak oversight and inadequate maintenance. Resilient infrastructure is the minimum standard that citizens deserve. The first weeks of the monsoon have delivered an unmistakable verdict. Maharashtra’s infrastructure has failed its annual examination. The government can no longer hide behind the clouds. Monsoons are annual appointments, not surprise inspections. If the state cannot prepare for the one disaster it knows is coming every year, it forfeits the right to claim competence.

Lotus and Sakura

As Asia’s strategic map shifts, India and Japan are discovering that their partnership is about far more than balancing China.

There was a time when India and Japan viewed one another primarily through the prism of economics. Where Japan supplied capital, technology and development assistance, India offered a vast market and an expanding pool of skilled labour. But that largely transactional relationship now appears to be changing.


Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s visit to New Delhi last week, culminating in the 16th India-Japan Annual Summit, suggests that Asia’s two largest democracies are constructing a partnership intended to shape the strategic architecture of the Indo-Pacific.


Strategic Partnership

The summit’s significance lay in the hard numbers and not diplomatic symbolism. India and Japan concluded 129 Memorandums of Understanding, expected to generate nearly $12.5 billion in fresh investments, while substantially expanding cooperation in artificial intelligence, semiconductors, defence technology, critical minerals, digital infrastructure and advanced manufacturing.


The timing could scarcely have been more appropriate. The Indo-Pacific has become the principal theatre of 21st century geopolitics. China’s growing military assertiveness, the continuing tensions on the Korean Peninsula, Russia’s enduring presence in Northeast Asia and the weaponisation of global supply chains have compelled middle powers to rethink old assumptions. Nations that once sought prosperity through economic integration are now equally concerned with resilience, technological sovereignty and strategic autonomy. India and Japan find themselves remarkably aligned on all three.


Japan’s own history explains why it approaches this changing world with characteristic pragmatism. Perched on the Pacific Ring of Fire, the island nation has repeatedly rebuilt itself after earthquakes, tsunamis and war. Following the Meiji Restoration of 1868, Japan modernised at extraordinary speed without abandoning its cultural identity. After the devastation of the Second World War, it rose again to become one of the world’s foremost technological and industrial powers. Few countries better understand that national strength depends as much upon innovation as military capability.


India, meanwhile, has undergone an equally profound transformation. Once viewed primarily as an emerging market, it is increasingly regarded as an indispensable strategic actor. Its demographic advantage, expanding manufacturing base, digital public infrastructure and growing geopolitical weight have made it central to the calculations of countries seeking alternatives to excessive dependence on China.


Substantive Outcomes

That convergence explains why the latest summit produced unusually substantive outcomes. Unlike many high-level meetings that generate lengthy communiqués but little implementation, the India-Japan summit delivered a comprehensive roadmap spanning infrastructure, energy security, digital technologies, industrial cooperation, defence production and emerging technologies. The package demonstrates that Tokyo’s confidence in India’s economic future remains undiminished despite global uncertainty.


Technology now lies at the heart of the relationship. Artificial intelligence occupied an unusually prominent place during the discussions. Both governments recognise that leadership in AI depends upon reliable semiconductor production, advanced electronics and secure digital ecosystems. These sectors are becoming as critical to national power as shipyards and steel mills once were.


Here the complementarities are striking. Japan contributes sophisticated manufacturing expertise, precision engineering and decades of industrial excellence. India offers one of the world's largest reservoirs of software talent, engineers and entrepreneurs. Together they possess the ingredients for one of Asia's most formidable innovation partnerships.


Semiconductors exemplify this convergence. As chips become indispensable to everything from electric vehicles to military systems and artificial intelligence, securing trusted production has become a matter of national security. Joint research, industrial collaboration and investments in semiconductor ecosystems are therefore about much more than economic growth. They are about reducing strategic vulnerabilities in an increasingly contested technological landscape.


Security cooperation has acquired similar urgency. India and Japan are maritime democracies with shared interests in preserving freedom of navigation and maintaining a rules-based Indo-Pacific. As China's naval reach expands across the region, both countries have steadily deepened defence dialogues, maritime cooperation, intelligence exchanges and joint military exercises.


The latest summit pushes that relationship further by expanding cooperation in defence technologies and industrial production. This is significant because modern security increasingly depends upon domestic technological capabilities rather than imported hardware alone. Defence manufacturing, advanced electronics and artificial intelligence are becoming inseparable components of national power.


Yet geopolitics alone does not explain the resilience of Indo-Japanese ties. Long before strategic partnerships became fashionable, Buddhism connected the civilizations of India and Japan. The eighth-century Indian monk Bodhisena’s journey to Nara, where he helped consecrate the Great Buddha, remains an enduring reminder that the two societies have interacted for well over a millennium. Those cultural links continue to generate goodwill that few contemporary strategic relationships can claim.


Japan’s rapidly ageing population has created acute labour shortages across sectors ranging from healthcare to advanced manufacturing. India, by contrast, possesses one of the world’s youngest workforces. Carefully managed mobility programmes, language training and skill partnerships could enable India to supply talent while helping Japan sustain economic dynamism. Human capital may yet become as important to the bilateral relationship as financial capital.


Challenges remain though. Bilateral trade still falls well below its potential. Regulatory complexities continue to frustrate investors, while large infrastructure projects frequently encounter delays. Turning ambitious summit declarations into measurable outcomes will demand sustained political commitment and bureaucratic efficiency in both capitals.


Nevertheless, the direction of travel is unmistakable. India and Japan are no longer connected merely by development assistance or commercial exchange. They are constructing a comprehensive partnership spanning defence, technology, infrastructure, education, supply chains and people-to-people ties. More importantly, they increasingly regard one another as indispensable partners in preserving stability across an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific.


(The writer is a foreign affairs expert. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page