top of page

By:

Rajeev Puri

24 October 2024 at 5:11:37 am

Before Sholay, there was Mera Gaon Mera Desh

When the comedian and television host Kapil Sharma recently welcomed the veteran screenwriter Salim Khan onto his show, he made a striking claim. India, he joked, has a national bird and a national animal; it ought also to have a national film. That film, he suggested, would surely be Sholay. Few would quarrel with the sentiment. Released in 1975 and directed by Ramesh Sippy,  Sholay  has long been treated as the Everest of Hindi popular cinema -quoted endlessly, revisited by generations and...

Before Sholay, there was Mera Gaon Mera Desh

When the comedian and television host Kapil Sharma recently welcomed the veteran screenwriter Salim Khan onto his show, he made a striking claim. India, he joked, has a national bird and a national animal; it ought also to have a national film. That film, he suggested, would surely be Sholay. Few would quarrel with the sentiment. Released in 1975 and directed by Ramesh Sippy,  Sholay  has long been treated as the Everest of Hindi popular cinema -quoted endlessly, revisited by generations and dissected by critics. In 2025, the film marked its 50th anniversary, and the release of a digitally restored, uncut version introduced the classic to a new generation of viewers who discovered that its mixture of revenge drama, western pastiche and buddy comedy remains curiously durable. The film’s influences have been debated almost as much as its dialogues – from scenes taken by the Spaghetti westerns of Sergio Leone, particularly ‘Once Upon a Time in the West’ (1968) or to the narrative architecture of ‘Seven Samurai’ (1954) by Akira Kurosawa. Others note echoes of earlier Hindi films about bandits and frontier justice, such as ‘Khotey Sikke’ (1973) starring Feroz Khan. Yet, rewatching ‘Mera Gaon Mera Desh,’ directed by Raj Khosla, one cannot help noticing how many of the narrative bones of  Sholay  appear to have been assembled there first. Released in 1971,  Mera Gaon Mera Desh  was a major hit at the box office, notable for holding its own in a year dominated by the near-hysterical popularity of Rajesh Khanna. The thematic framework of the two films is strikingly similar. In  Sholay , the retired policeman Thakur Baldev Singh recruits two petty criminals - Jai and Veeru - to help him avenge the terror inflicted upon his village by the bandit Gabbar Singh. In  Mera Gaon Mera Desh , the set-up is not very different. A retired soldier, Jaswant Singh, seeks to protect his village from a ruthless dacoit and enlists the help of a small-time crook named Ajit. Even the villain’s name seems to echo across the two films. In Khosla’s drama, the marauding bandit played by Vinod Khanna is scene-stealing performance is called Jabbar Singh. In  Sholay , the outlaw who would become one of Indian cinema’s most memorable antagonists was Gabbar Singh. There is an additional irony in the casting. In  Mera Gaon Mera Desh , the retired soldier Jaswant Singh is played by Jayant - the real-life father of Amjad Khan, who would later immortalise Gabbar Singh in  Sholay . The connective tissue between the two films becomes even clearer in the presence of Dharmendra. In Khosla’s film he plays Ajit, a charming rogue who gradually redeems himself while defending the village. Four years later, Dharmendra returned in  Sholay  as Veeru, a similarly exuberant petty criminal whose courage and irrepressible humour make him one half of Hindi cinema’s most beloved buddy duo alongside Amitabh Bachchan as Jai. Certain visual motifs also appear to have travelled intact. In Khosla’s film, Ajit finds himself bound in ropes in the bandit’s den during a dramatic musical sequence. A similar image appears in  Sholay , where Veeru is tied up before Gabbar Singh while Basanti performs the now famous song ‘Jab Tak Hai Jaan.’ Other echoes are subtler but just as suggestive. Ajit’s pursuit of the village belle Anju, played by Asha Parekh, anticipates Veeru’s boisterous attempts to woo Basanti, portrayed by Hema Malini. Scenes in which Ajit teaches Anju to shoot recall the flirtatious gun-training sequence between Veeru and Basanti that became one of  Sholay ’s most cherished moments. Even the famous coin motif has a precedent. Ajit frequently tosses a coin to make decisions - a flourish that would later appear in  Sholay , where Jai’s coin toss becomes a running gag. Perhaps most intriguingly, the endings of the two films converge in their original form. In  Mera Gaon Mera Desh , the villain is ultimately killed by the hero. The uncut version of  Sholay  reportedly ended in a similar fashion, with Gabbar Singh meeting his death at the hands of Thakur Baldev Singh. However, censors altered the climax before the film’s 1975 release, requiring that Gabbar be handed over to the police instead. All this does not diminish  Sholay . Rather, it highlights the alchemy through which cinema evolves. The scriptwriting duo Salim–Javed took familiar ingredients and expanded them into a grander narrative populated by unforgettable characters and stylised action. On the 55 th  anniversary of  Mera Gaon Mera Desh , Raj Khosla’s rugged western deserves a renewed glance as the sturdy foundation on which a legend called  Sholay  was built. (The author is a political commentator and a global affairs observer. Views personal.)

OBC Oversight

The expansion of the new Mahayuti cabinet led by CM Devendra Fadnavis has set tongues wagging. The conspicuous exclusion of OBC leaders like Chhagan Bhujbal, Sudhir Mungantiwar and Sanjay Kunte has sparked speculation of the move being an emerging risk for the Mahayuti coalition, especially BJP.


To offset this, the ruling coalition has done a ‘strategic recalibration’ by inducting the BJP’s Pankaja Munde and her cousin, the NCP’s Dhananjay Munde in the cabinet. However, this prompts the question whether the Munde cousins can fill the leadership vacuum among Maharashtra’s OBCs. The BJP’s dominance in Maharashtra has always been a delicate juggling act — satisfying the aspirations of its urban, upper-caste core while appeasing its growing OBC voter base. It was Pankaja’s father, the late Gopinath Munde, whose deft welding of the diffuse OBC communities made it a potent vote-bank.


The last 18 months have seen Chhagan Bhujbal, a stalwart member of the ruling Ajit Pawar’s NCP, emerge as the most vocal voice of the OBCs by taking a firm stance against Maratha quota activist Manoj Jarange-Patil. Bhujbal, projecting himself as an ‘elder’ leader concerned with safeguarding the OBC community’s reservation pie against Maratha encroachment, had managed to gather the fragmented OBC castes and sub-castes during his rallies to counter Jarange-Patil’s insistent demand of securing a Maratha quota under the OBC category. Bhujbal’s stance had resulted in strains within the erstwhile cabinet under CM Eknath Shinde.


Now, Bhujbal has cried foul over his exclusion in ‘Mahayuti 2.0,’ hinting that his advocacy for OBCs may have cost him a cabinet berth. While Bhujbal’s outspokenness may have made him a liability in Ajit Pawar’s calculations, sidelining him underscores the Mahayuti’s tenuous position in balancing the demands of its OBC base and the politically assertive Marathas.


In this context, the induction of the Munde siblings, Pankaja and Dhananjay, appears a calculated move. The BJP and the Mahayuti seek to tap into Munde’s enduring appeal among OBC voters. Yet, the choice is fraught with challenges. Pankaja Munde, estranged from the BJP’s leadership for years, has been a vocal critic of Devendra Fadnavis, even blaming him for her 2019 electoral defeat. Though all that is water under the bridge, the Munde family’s chequered political record and internal dynamics could undermine the Mahayuti’s efforts to project them as the new torchbearers of OBC politics.


Complicating matters further is the simmering tension between Maharashtra’s OBCs and Marathas. Jarange-Patil, who remained quiescent during the Assembly polls, has again threatened to go on a collective strike from January 25 next year, intensifying his demand for Marathas to be included under the OBC category.


In Maharashtra’s fractious politics, where caste and coalitions shape outcomes, the BJP’s gamble hinges on the Munde cousins rising as credible OBC leaders. Whether this youthful shift strengthens the BJP or backfires remains uncertain.

Comments

bottom of page