top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Predators’ Revenge

From the forests of Chandrapur to the coffee estates of Mysuru, the uneasy cohabitation between man and beast has been turning deadly of late. Over the past two months, a nine-year-old tiger killed six people across two forest divisions in Chandrapur, evading capture for weeks before finally walking into a cage baited with fresh meat. The caging of this tiger has brought to the fore the larger problem of human-animal conflict.


Across India, official records show that over 100 people are killed by tigers every year, a number that has steadily climbed as the country’s conservation successes collide with its development ambitions. Tigers, once endangered, are multiplying. But so are people, roads, mines and settlements encroaching upon what remains of the wild.


In Chandrapur, this contradiction is particularly stark. The district hosts a dense concentration of tigers - nearly 200 by some estimates - within a fragmented landscape of forests and coal mines. Tadoba-Andhari, Maharashtra’s oldest national park, sits amid a checkerboard of thermal power stations, open-cast mines, and expanding villages. The very success of Tadoba’s conservation programme, which has seen tiger numbers surge in recent years, has turned the surrounding areas into a danger zone. Dispersing tigers, especially young or ageing males pushed out of core territories, find themselves in human-dominated landscapes where cattle are easy prey and farmers an unintended casualty.


The tiger caged in Chandrapur is a case in point. Having killed six people, he became both a symbol of nature’s fury and a scapegoat for human neglect. In Karnataka’s Mysuru district, two fatal tiger attacks within a month have stirred anger and grief. The victims, both rural workers, were attacked while grazing cattle or working in fields abutting forest fringes. Villagers accuse the Forest Department of negligence, arguing that officials act only after tragedy strikes. For rural communities dependent on land and forest produce, coexistence has become a euphemism for fear.


Ecologists have long warned that as forest corridors shrink and buffer zones degrade, encounters between humans and tigers will rise. Satellite data confirm that in central and southern India, agricultural expansion and infrastructure projects have sliced through key wildlife passages. Tigers forced into smaller ranges face competition for prey and territory, leading some to venture into villages. The government’s approach remains reactive rather than preventive. State forest departments typically deploy capture squads only after multiple deaths. The Wildlife Institute of India’s 2019 guidelines urging habitat restoration and corridor protection have seen little traction on the ground.


India’s tiger success story, once a global conservation triumph, risks being marred by complacency. With nearly 3,000 tigers - over 70 percent of the world’s population - the country has proved that large predators can recover under protection. But that recovery is fragile. Unless habitat connectivity, scientific management and community participation become central to policy, the line between forest and field will keep blurring with tragic consequences for both man and beast.

Comments


bottom of page