top of page

By:

Divyaa Advaani 

2 November 2024 at 3:28:38 am

The Space That Speaks

Some people step too close without realising it. Others recoil the moment we enter their personal space. In boardrooms, cafeterias, client meetings or even casual workplace conversations, the invisible boundary between comfort and discomfort is crossed more often than we admit. And every time it happens, something subtle but significant shifts. A colleague feels disrespected. A client feels pushed. A partner silently withdraws. Space may be unseen, but its consequences are very real —...

The Space That Speaks

Some people step too close without realising it. Others recoil the moment we enter their personal space. In boardrooms, cafeterias, client meetings or even casual workplace conversations, the invisible boundary between comfort and discomfort is crossed more often than we admit. And every time it happens, something subtle but significant shifts. A colleague feels disrespected. A client feels pushed. A partner silently withdraws. Space may be unseen, but its consequences are very real — especially in today’s workplace, where one misread signal can erode trust faster than any spoken mistake.   A few months ago, a mid-sized consulting firm approached me with a puzzling problem. Their young team was technically brilliant, but client retention had dropped sharply. After observing a few interactions, the issue became obvious: enthusiastic associates were unknowingly leaning too close, interrupting personal bubbles, and making global clients uncomfortable. Nothing was ill-intentioned — just unaware. Yet that small behavioural gap had created a Rs 1.6 crore revenue leakage over the year. Once we worked on spatial awareness, presence and non-verbal communication, the same team rebuilt client confidence and closed three major renewals within a quarter.   This is why personal space is not a “soft” concept. It is strategy. It is reputation. It is a non-negotiable part of personal branding.   When people think of personal branding, they imagine polished LinkedIn profiles or impressive introductions. But the truth is simpler and deeper: your personal brand is your behaviour. It’s the distance you maintain, the respect you signal, the safety you create for others in a conversation. Space is communication — silent but powerful. When you don’t understand where your boundary ends and where someone else’s begins, your interactions unintentionally send the message that you lack awareness, sensitivity or professionalism. For a leader, this can appear as dominance. For a young executive, it can appear as insecurity or over-eagerness. For a business owner, it can cost trust and business.   Modern workplaces are more global and more culturally diverse than ever before. In India alone, teams now collaborate daily with counterparts from the UK, Europe, Southeast Asia, the Middle East and the US — each with very different expectations of proximity. What feels friendly to one culture feels intrusive to another. When employees are not trained to navigate these subtle differences, the company brand is what ultimately suffers.   And here’s the truth companies often overlook: you cannot build a strong organisational brand without strong individual brands inside it. When employees understand boundaries — emotional, verbal and physical — they communicate with clarity, empathy and confidence. They carry themselves with the ease that clients trust. They handle negotiations better. They build relationships faster. They close deals without friction. The company’s culture becomes more respectful, more refined and more reliable.   I’ve seen it repeatedly while working with founders, leadership teams and fast-growing organisations: the fastest way to elevate a company’s external image is to elevate the personal brand of the people representing it. Not through scripted behaviour but through awareness — especially in the small, often ignored details like space, body language and non-verbal cues.   These details decide whether your teams come across as polished or unprepared, mindful or careless, leadership-ready or still learning.   If any of this feels familiar — a slightly awkward handshake, a colleague who stands too close, a new executive who unintentionally intimidates a client — it’s more than a social inconvenience. It’s a branding issue. And one that’s entirely fixable.   Because when people feel respected in your presence, they trust you. When they trust you, they listen. And when they listen, they say yes more often — to ideas, partnerships, renewals and opportunities.   If you’re a business leader who wants your teams to communicate with maturity, presence and global sensitivity, you can reach out for a complimentary consultation call here : https://sprect.com/pro/divyaaadvaani Strong personal brands build strong company brands. And it all begins with something as simple, as silent and as powerful as space. (The author is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries. Views personal.)

Selective Outrage

India’s left-liberal media has long prided itself on being the torchbearer of secularism, dissent and moral rectitude. In the aftermath of ‘Operation Sindoor,’ the precision military strike launched by the Modi government against Pakistan-based terror camps, it has revealed its not a principled commitment to peace or truth, but a disturbing penchant for ideological prejudice, performative sanctimony and selective outrage.


The operation itself was a textbook display of calibrated force and geopolitical prudence. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, often caricatured as ‘authoritarian’ by the ‘liberal’ English-language commentariat, chose patience over provocation. He consulted opposition leaders, held detailed discussions with defence chiefs and took key international stakeholders, notably the United States and Russia, into confidence before authorising limited military action. The symbolism of ‘Operation Sindoor’ was also carefully crafted: a pointed reminder that the attack’s real victims were Hindu women widowed by Pakistan-sponsored militants in Kashmir. The government’s briefings were also strategic and symbolic as two ranking female officers, one of them Muslim, were made the public face of the mission, underlining a new Indian confidence that blends military muscle with democratic pluralism.


But this was unacceptable for India’s entrenched ‘left-liberal’ press, steeped in academic jargon, Western validation and a knee-jerk hostility to anything remotely ‘Hindutva.’ That a Muslim officer briefed the nation on ‘Operation Sindoor’ was branded ‘tokenism’ by such commentators. Others crudely alleged that the April 22 Pahalgam massacre was the logical culmination of reported atrocities against Muslims since Modi came to power in 2014.


The semantic nitpicking over ‘Operation Sindoor’ was maddening. An editor of a prominent magazine dubbed the operation’s name as ‘patriarchal’ and coded in Hindutva tropes. In a bizarre case of moral inversion, sindoor was likened to symbols of ‘honour killings’ and gender oppression, ignoring both its cultural resonance and the cruel reality that these women had lost their husbands in cold blood. For years, India’s ‘secular’ commentariat nurtured a preordained binary: the Congress may be flawed but was at least ‘secular’ while the BJP was an inveterate ‘fascist.’ Thus, the 2002 Gujarat riots are always focused upon but the Congress-backed pogrom of the Sikhs in 1984 is either downplayed or rationalised. Terrorism in Kashmir is tragic, but state retaliation is ‘jingoism.’ A strong Muslim voice in government is ‘tokenism’ but its absence is ‘exclusion.’ Even journalistic rigour is selectively applied. When Pakistan claimed to have downed Indian jets, some Indian outlets rushed to amplify the story before verification, inadvertently echoing enemy propaganda.


Dissent is vital in any democracy. But when its becomes indistinguishable from disdain, when editorial choices are dictated by ideological conformity, then the press becomes a caricature of itself. Ironically, many of these journalists enjoy robust free speech and loudly lament India’s supposed slide into ‘fascism’ from the safety of their X handles. Yet they turn a blind eye to Putin’s repression, Erdogan’s purges or Xi Jinping’s camps. In their eyes, Modi remains the greatest threat to democracy even as they broadcast their outrage freely, without fear of censorship or reprisal. ‘Operation Sindoor’ was a statement of cultural self-confidence. That confidence has rattled those who have spent their careers gatekeeping Indian discourse. Today, their monopoly is over. The people are watching and they no longer believe that the emperor has clothes.

Comments

bottom of page