top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city...

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city will get a ‘Hindu Marathi’ person to head India’s richest civic body, while the Opposition Shiv Sena (UBT)-Maharashtra Navnirman Sena also harbour fond hopes of a miracle that could ensure their own person for the post. The Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) optimism stems from expectations of possible political permutations-combinations that could develop with a realignment of forces as the Supreme Court is hearing the cases involving the Shiv Sena-Nationalist Congress Party this week. Catapulted as the largest single party, the BJP hopes to install a first ever party-man as Mayor, but that may not create history. Way back in 1982-1983, a BJP leader Dr. Prabhakar Pai had served in the top post in Mumbai (then Bombay). Incidentally, Dr. Pai hailed from Udupi district of Karnataka, and his appointment came barely a couple of years after the BJP was formed (1980), capping a distinguished career as a city father, said experts. Originally a Congressman, Dr. Pai later shifted to the Bharatiya Janata Party, then back to Congress briefly, founded the Janata Seva Sangh before immersing himself in social activities. Second Administrator The 2026 Mayoral elections have evoked huge interest not only among Mumbaikars but across the country as it comes after nearly four years since the BMC was governed by an Administrator. This was only the second time in the BMC history that an Administrator was named after April 1984-May 1985. On both occasions, there were election-related issues, the first time the elections got delayed for certain reasons and the second time the polling was put off owing to Ward delimitations and OBC quotas as the matter was pending in the courts. From 1931 till 2022, Mumbai has been lorded over by 76 Mayors, men and women, hailing from various regions, backgrounds, castes and communities. They included Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Sikhs, even a Jew, etc., truly reflecting the cosmopolitan personality of the coastal city and India’s financial powerhouse. In 1931-1932, the Mayor was a Parsi, J. B. Boman Behram, and others from his community followed like Khurshed Framji Nariman (after whom Nariman Point is named), E. A. Bandukwala, Minoo Masani, B. N. Karanjia and other bigwigs. There were Muslims like Hoosenally Rahimtoola, Sultan M. Chinoy, the legendary Yusuf Meherally, Dr. A. U. Memon and others. The Christian community got a fair share of Mayors with Joseph A. D’Souza – who was Member of Constituent Assembly representing Bombay Province for writing-approving the Constitution of India, M. U. Mascarenhas, P. A. Dias, Simon C. Fernandes, J. Leon D’Souza, et al. A Jew Elijah Moses (1937-1938) and a Sikh M. H. Bedi (1983-1984), served as Mayors, but post-1985, for the past 40 years, nobody from any minority community occupied the august post. During the silver jubilee year of the post, Sulochana M. Modi became the first woman Mayor of Mumbai (1956), and later with tweaks in the rules, many women ruled in this post – Nirmala Samant-Prabhavalkar (1994-1995), Vishakha Raut (997-1998), Dr. Shubha Raul (March 2007-Nov. 2009), Shraddha Jadhav (Dec. 2009-March 2012), Snehal Ambedkar (Sep. 2014-March 2017). The last incumbent (before the Administrator) was a government nurse, Kishori Pednekar (Nov. 2019-March 2022) - who earned the sobriquet of ‘Florence Nightingale’ of Mumbai - as she flitted around in her full white uniform at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic, earning the admiration of the citizens. Mumbai Mayor – high-profile post The Mumbai Mayor’s post is considered a crucial step in the political ladder and many went on to become MLAs, MPs, state-central ministers, a Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief Ministers and union ministers. The formidable S. K. Patil was Mayor (1949-1952) and later served in the union cabinets of PMs Jawaharlal Nehru, Lah Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi; Dahyabhai V. Patel (1954-1955) was the son of India’s first Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel; Manohar Joshi (1976-1977) became the CM of Maharashtra, later union minister and Speaker of Lok Sabha; Chhagan Bhujbal (1985-1986 – 1990-1991) became a Deputy CM.

Snubbing Sarfaraz Khan – Masterstroke or Hit Wicket?

The sweet symphony of Indian cricket selection – a melody so predictable it could be scored by a tone-deaf orchestra. Just when you thought the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) had exhausted its repertoire of baffling decisions, they drop another chart-topper: excluding Sarfaraz Khan from the India A squad for the upcoming red-ball series against South Africa A. Because nothing says “meritocracy” like ignoring a batsman who’s been piling up runs like he’s hoarding them for a rainy day in Mumbai’s monsoons. It’s October 25, 2025, folks, and apparently, in the grand theater of Test cricket grooming, Sarfaraz is the understudy who forgot his lines. Or, more likely, the one they never bothered to audition.


Let’s rewind the tape – or, in this case, the scorecard – for those blissfully unaware of the farce unfolding. Sarfaraz Khan, the Mumbai middle-order maestro, isn’t some wide-eyed rookie begging for scraps. No, this is a man who’s treated the Ranji Trophy like his personal batting nets, amassing over 3,900 runs at an average north of 67 since his debut in 2014. In the 2023-24 season alone, he notched up 556 runs at 92.66, including three centuries that screamed “pick me!” louder than a vuvuzela at a World Cup. And let’s not forget his Test cameos: a gritty 66 on debut against England in 2024, followed by a counter-attacking 68 in the same series. He even smashed 92 against England Lions just weeks ago, a knock so elegant it could make Picasso weep. Yet, here we are, with the India A squad announcement on October 23 reading like a who’s who of “anyone but him.” Rishabh Pant returns from his toe-tapping hiatus? Splendid. Yashasvi Jaiswal and Sai Sudharsan get the nod? Of course, they’re the flavor of the month. But Sarfaraz? Oh, honey, sit this one out. The bench is warm; we’ve saved it just for you.


The official line from the BCCI? A masterpiece of evasion worthy of a Kafka novel. Sources whisper it’s because Pant’s back, as if one wicketkeeper-batsman is a zero-sum game where room must be made by evicting the guy who’s actually been, you know, playing and scoring. Or perhaps it’s that perennial favorite: “not fully match-fit.” Never mind that Sarfaraz has been Mumbai’s rock in the ongoing Ranji Trophy, or that he turned 28 last week without so much as a participation trophy from the selectors. Shardul Thakur, bless his all-rounder heart, piped up yesterday with the gem: “Sarfaraz doesn’t need India A games to play international cricket.” How adorably optimistic! It’s like telling a PhD candidate they don’t need a thesis defense because they’ve already read the books. Sure, Shardul, and I don’t need oxygen because I’ve breathed before. But in the cutthroat arena of Indian selections, where spots are doled out like party favors to the connected, “not needing” something is code for “we’re pretending you don’t exist.”


And oh, the delicious undercurrents of this snub – because nothing spices up incompetence like a dash of controversy. Kerala politician Shama Mohamed couldn’t resist tweeting the elephant in the room: “Not selected because of surname?” Ouch. Sarfaraz Khan – that distinctly Muslim name in a lineup where diversity often stops at “safe bets” – suddenly feels like the plot twist in a bad Bollywood drama. Remember when he was overlooked for years despite domestic hauls that could fill a warehouse? Or how, post-debut, he’s been shuttled like a spare tire, only to be deflated at the first sign of “balance”? It’s almost poetic: a player from a minority community, grinding through Islamophobic whispers and selector blind spots, only to be told, “Thanks, but we’ve got enough brown-skinned talent… just not your kind.” Sarcasm aside (though who are we kidding?), if merit were the metric, Sarfaraz would be captaining India A by now, not cooling his heels while lesser lights get their glow-up.


The selectors, ensconced in their air-conditioned echo chambers, probably patted themselves on the back for “strategic depth.” Depth? More like the shallow end of the talent pool, where favoritism floats and form sinks.


It’s a travesty that reeks of the BCCI’s favorite perfume: entitlement. They’ve turned “A” team into “Also-Rans” for players like Sarfaraz, who dare to excel without the right godfather or Instagram filter. Irfan Pathan called it “not even close to the truth” when excuses flew, and he’s spot on. This isn’t oversight; it’s obstruction. A board that preaches workload management but overloads its darlings, that champions youth but benches proven performers – it’s a clown car careening toward irrelevance.


(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page