top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Tibetan refugees protest in Mumbai

Supporters from the Tibetan Youth Congress react during a protest at Azad Maidan in Mumbai on Monday against China's new ethnic unity law. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Over 250 Tibetan refugees, activists and members of the Friends of Tibet took out a rally and demonstrated near the Chinese Consulate in Mumbai as part of an international action to protest against China’s new Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law (EUPPL). The Tibetans living in Mumbai were joined by other protestors from...

Tibetan refugees protest in Mumbai

Supporters from the Tibetan Youth Congress react during a protest at Azad Maidan in Mumbai on Monday against China's new ethnic unity law. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Over 250 Tibetan refugees, activists and members of the Friends of Tibet took out a rally and demonstrated near the Chinese Consulate in Mumbai as part of an international action to protest against China’s new Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law (EUPPL). The Tibetans living in Mumbai were joined by other protestors from Bhandara (Maharashtra) and Mundgod (Karnataka) and a relay hunger strike was also taken up the Tibetan Youth Congress (TYC) in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, said Coordinator, Tenzin Tsundue. The day started with a silent rally from Rajgriha, the home of the late Dr. B. R. Ambedkar to his memorial, Chaityabhoomi, both in Dadar. Another rally-cum-demonstration was carried out near Nariman Point where the Chinese Consulate is located and at the Azad Maidan, said Tsundue. “We carried out a peaceful protest at Nariman Point and wanted to go and submit a memorandum to the Chinese Consul-General. However, the police prevented us, detained a few Tibetans and sent them back to Azad Maidan,” Tsundue told ‘The Perfect Voice’, from the venue. He said that Tibetans and others like Uyghurs are strongly opposed to the new law which came into effect last week, despite criticism from the United Nations Organisation (UNO), Taiwan, TYC and human rights groups worldwide. Their prime concerns are that the (EUPPL) could place further restrictions on the minorities’ rights, deepen assimilation policies targeting the ethnic groups and dilute the protection to their respective languages, cultures and traditions. China’s Denial One provision is said to allow individuals to be held accountable for alleged violations of the Chinese laws even outside the country, raising apprehensions it could target the government’s critics or campaigners abroad. However, China has rubbished all allegations of rights abuses against the ethnic minority group, and reiterated that its policies aim to promote social stability, security and economic development for all. Unconvinced, Tibetans and Uyghurs have urged the international community to build pressure on China to strike down the EUPPL as “it aims to erase the minority communities”. The Mainland Affairs Council of Taiwan has argued that Taiwanese are already facing high risks travelling to China and now the country has “yet another law to fabricate charges”, and it could deploy it “to further suppress and prosecute human rights activists”. TYC slams China The TYC said that the international action today was dedicated to the memory of the supreme sacrifice of Lobga Rangzen who self-immolated himself outside the UN Headquarters in New York on July 2 to draw the world’s attention to the cause of Tibet. Rejecting the new law, the TYC said: “This legislation is not a law of unity but a political instrument to force assimilation of nations living under Chinese occupation, like Tibet, East Turkestan, Southern Mongolia, and Manchuria. Behind the language of ‘ethnic unity’ lies an agenda of Unilateral control by institutionalising policies aimed at assimilating Tibetans through political domination.” It accused China of attempts “to erase national identities by suppressing distinct languages, undermining religious institutions, rewriting history, destroying cultural heritage, separating children from their communities through state run colonial boarding schools, and replacing distinct identities with loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party”.

Studying Hinduism Through an Indian Lens

Hindu Studies Centres seek to examine the tradition through indigenous knowledge systems rather than Western academic frameworks.

AI generated image
AI generated image

In many universities across the world, religion-based philosophy is taught with a critical and analytical approach. Prestigious Ivy League institutions like Harvard University have dedicated schools such as the Harvard Divinity School, where Hindu religion and philosophy are taught—often by foreign scholars. Similarly, many universities host Centres for Religious Studies or South Asian Studies, where Hinduism and its philosophical traditions are studied. The Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies is one such institution fully devoted to Hindu studies, offering numerous online courses to Indian, international, and diaspora students. Many Hindu industrialists contribute financially to such centres. However, it is important to note that these institutions largely follow Western research methodologies.


This raises an important question: why should there not be institutions, centres, or university departments in India that study Hinduism based on Indian research methodologies and knowledge systems? Indian universities have long-established departments for Islamic Studies, Buddhist Studies, and Jainology. However, similar efforts for Hindu studies have either not been made or have been discouraged. A compromise often adopted is to name such departments “Indian Studies” instead of explicitly using the term "Hindu".


It is said that a few years ago, a university declined a donation for establishing a Hindu Studies centre simply because the name “Hindu” was not acceptable. This reflects certain ideological tendencies that have existed in higher education.


Against this backdrop, through the efforts of the vice-chancellor and members of the management council of the University of Mumbai, a Hindu philosophy study centre was established in February 2022, later renamed the Hindu Studies Centre. The challenge then was to design curricula free from Western dominance and rooted in Indian knowledge systems and indigenous research methodologies.


In the same year, the University Grants Commission proposed that universities across India adopt a standardised curriculum for Hindu studies centres. Consequently, the Hindu Studies Centre at the University of Mumbai launched an M.A. programme in Hindu Studies. Additionally, programmes such as an M.A. in Keertan Shastra (Marathi tradition), a Postgraduate Diploma in Temple Management, and three online courses based on the Bhagavad Gita were introduced.


The M.A. in Hindu Studies includes subjects such as Dharma, Purusharthas, Rin (debts), epistemology (Pramana-Mimamsa), Vedas, Upanishads, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Bhagavad Gita, Bhakti traditions, Sanskrit, rebirth, Karma theory, and the six classical systems of philosophy (Shad Darshanas). Temple management studies include infrastructure, environmental sustainability, disaster management, welfare schemes, and crowd management.


Recent films have portrayed that Hindus often have very limited knowledge of their own religion. When such uninformed youth step onto the global stage, they may become confused, misled, or influenced by misinformation. Therefore, initiatives like Hindu Studies Centres must be widely embraced by the Hindu community.


These centres do not focus on rituals or religious practices but instead aim to develop a perspective on society, encourage harmonious social engagement, prevent intellectual manipulation, promote life values, and advocate an eco-friendly way of living. If we fail to support such initiatives, then the effort to build a scholarly, Indian, knowledge-based understanding of Hinduism will go in vain—and that would be truly unfortunate.


(The writer is a professor at Mumbai University. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page