Talent Thrust into the Fire
- Waleed Hussain

- 2 hours ago
- 4 min read

Shubman Gill’s rapid rise to India’s ODI captaincy in late 2025 was billed as the beginning of a bold new chapter for Indian cricket. At just 26, the elegant Punjab batsman had already carved out an impressive resume: a Test average above 50, consistent big scores in white-ball cricket, and a reputation as one of the most technically sound stroke-makers in the modern game. His appointment came on the heels of Rohit Sharma’s retirement from limited-overs formats following India’s successful Champions Trophy campaign in early 2025, where Rohit had led with trademark composure. The BCCI, under chief selector Ajit Agarkar and in consultation with head coach Gautam Gambhir, saw Gill as the natural long-term successor, fast-tracking him to prepare for the 2027 ODI World Cup in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Namibia. Yet, mere months into the role, the initial excitement has given way to intense scrutiny, with a string of disappointing results prompting debates about whether the transition was rushed.
Gill’s ODI captaincy journey began inauspiciously with a three-match series against Australia in October 2025. The opener in Perth was a rain-marred affair reduced to 26 overs, where India lost by seven wickets under the DLS method. Gill managed just 10 runs off 18 balls, undone by the relentless pace of Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood. The second match saw another collapse under pressure, sealing a 2-1 series defeat despite a dominant consolation win in the third ODI at Sydney, chasing down the target with nine wickets to spare. This made Gill only the second Indian captain after Virat Kohli to lose his debut ODI as skipper, highlighting the brutal initiation he faced in a high-stakes away series.
The situation deteriorated further in January 2026 during the home series against New Zealand. What was expected to be a routine assignment against a transitional Kiwi side turned into a historic setback: New Zealand’s first-ever bilateral ODI series victory on Indian soil. India took the first ODI in Vadodara by four wickets, chasing 301 with composure. However, New Zealand bounced back emphatically in the second at Rajkot, winning by seven wickets after posting a competitive total. The decider in Indore proved decisive—New Zealand amassed 337/8, powered by centuries from Daryl Mitchell (137) and Glenn Phillips (106), before bowling India out for 296 despite Virat Kohli’s valiant 124. The 41-run loss completed a 2-1 series defeat, leaving fans and experts stunned.
In six ODIs as captain, Gill’s record stands at two wins and four losses—a win percentage of just 33.33 per cent, a sharp contrast to India’s historical dominance in the format and Rohit’s roughly 75 per cent success rate over 56 matches. Critics have zeroed in on tactical shortcomings: sluggish powerplay bowling, delayed changes, questionable field placements, and a perceived lack of aggression. Former players like Ajinkya Rahane pointed to missed opportunities in the Indore game, where spinners Kuldeep Yadav and Ravindra Jadeja were underutilized while part-timers bowled more overs. Commentators such as Ian Smith noted Gill appearing “out of ideas” during key partnerships, and Simon Doull criticised his passivity. Social media and platforms like Reddit have echoed this, branding him a “weak captain,” with some fans even demanding his removal following poor domestic Ranji Trophy outings (0 and 14 in one match). Calls have surfaced to reinstate Rohit Sharma, with former cricketer Manoj Tiwary questioning why the BCCI moved on from a proven winner so soon after a major title.
Gill’s personal form offers a silver lining. Since assuming captaincy, he has averaged over 50 in ODIs (though some reports note a dip to around 29-30 in captaincy games compared to pre-captaincy highs near 59), demonstrating resilience under pressure. His batting remains a cornerstone, providing stability at the top. There are also encouraging signs for the future: backing young bowlers like Harshit Rana, who has shown promise, and all-rounder Nitish Kumar Reddy, who contributed usefully in the New Zealand series. Gill’s Test captaincy, starting mid-2025 after Rohit and Kohli’s retirements from the format, has shown more promise—a hard-fought 2-2 draw in England, including a century in the opener—suggesting multi-format leadership could hone his skills faster, akin to Kohli’s growth.
However, captaincy demands more than runs; it requires aura, decisiveness, and the ability to inspire in crises—qualities Rohit exuded calmly and Kohli fiercely. Gill, with limited prior experience (sporadic IPL stints with Gujarat Titans reaching playoffs but no titles, plus brief T20I captaincy), appears to lack that intangible edge. The BCCI’s choice seems driven by batting pedigree and long-term vision rather than extensive leadership credentials, raising questions of favouritism over merit in a results-oriented sport.
Looking forward, redemption lies in upcoming challenges: tours, the 2026 Asia Cup, and building toward 2027. Consistent series wins could quiet critics and allow Gill to mature. Persistent struggles, though, might force a rethink—perhaps elevating KL Rahul or Suryakumar Yadav.
Gill is undeniably talented, a generational batsman with poise and potential. But talent alone rarely lifts trophies; leadership must match it. For now, his ODI captaincy remains a high-stakes experiment—full of promise yet perilously close to unravelling if results don’t improve soon.
(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)





Comments