top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Tarnished Dynasty

The latest first information report (FIR) filed by Delhi Police’s Economic Offences Wing against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and six others in the long-running National Herald case is a moral indictment of a political dynasty that has come to embody entitlement without accountability.


The allegations, drawn from an Enforcement Directorate (ED) complaint spanning investigations from 2008 to 2024, describe what prosecutors call an “elaborate criminal conspiracy” to take control of assets worth over Rs. 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Ltd (AJL), the original publisher of the National Herald. The mechanism is almost offensively audacious: the conversion of a Rs. 90.21-crore loan extended by the All India Congress Committee (AICC) into equity, which was then cornered by Young Indian, a private company in which Sonia and Rahul together hold 76 per cent stake. The price paid for this was allegedly a paltry Rs. 50 lakh.


The FIR alleges that Congress, under the stewardship of its then president and general secretary, voluntarily surrendered a recoverable asset of Rs. 90 crore and with it, effective ownership of properties worth nearly Rs. 2,000 crore without open consultation, market valuation or transparent process. Shareholders of AJL, reduced overnight to irrelevance after Young Indian acquired 99 percent of the company, are said to have been cheated. So too, the FIR suggests, were Congress donors, whose money was effectively bartered away.


Three properties stand as symbols of this quiet expropriation: Herald House in central Delhi, AJL House in Mumbai’s Bandra East, and a prime property in Lucknow. All had been allotted at concessional rates for public purposes but allegedly ended up serving private control. To call this a mere ‘technical breach,’ as the Congress routinely does, is to insult both common sense and corporate governance.


The Gandhis’ standard defence, that this is a case of political vendetta, has worn thin with repetition. The original complaint came not from a government agency but from Subramanian Swamy in 2013. Trial courts took cognisance in 2014. The High Court declined to intervene. Formal charges were filed by the ED in April 2024.


Yet the Congress’s instinctive response remains denial without explanation. When confronted with the new FIR, it has claimed ignorance. When asked about Young Indian’s alleged bogus donations, fake advertisement revenue and questionable advance rents, the party falls back on scripted outrage.


The National Herald was not an ordinary corporate asset but a political legacy, founded by Jawaharlal Nehru as a voice of the freedom movement. To see it reduced to a vehicle in a labyrinthine financial transaction replete with shell companies and suspicious revenues speaks to the moral hollowing-out of the very dynasty that claims custodianship of India’s republican soul. Each new filing in the National Herald case chips away at what little moral authority still survives with the Congress. India’s opposition needs credibility. Instead, it is saddled with a dynasty trapped in legal quicksand of its own making.

Comments


bottom of page