Thackeray Twilight
- Correspondent
- 5 hours ago
- 2 min read
For nearly six decades, Mumbai’s municipal politics revolved around a single surname. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), India’s richest civic body and the city’s real seat of power, was less an institution than a Thackeray fiefdom. That era now looks decisively over.
With the BJP, in alliance with Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena emerging dominant in the most keenly-contested civic body, the verdict is unmistakable: the Thackeray cousins’ reunion has failed, and with it the illusion that legacy alone can still command Mumbai’s streets.
The cousins had hoped that their dramatic reunion after nearly 20 years of acrimony would revive the Thackeray brand and consolidate the ‘Marathi Manoos’ vote. Instead, it exposed how thin that nativist brand has become. Mumbai’s voters, long accustomed to civic decay and political theatre, were unimpressed by appeals to wounded pride by a family whose scions have lived in ostentatious luxury. Besides empty rhetoric, neither Uddhav nor his flashy cousin Raj had any answers to Mumbai’s potholes, flooding, transport chaos or housing problems.
The Thackerays’ fought a campaign heavy on identity and light on governance. They warned darkly that Mumbai’s soul was under threat, casting themselves as the city’s last authentic custodians. Yet they conspicuously avoided sustained attacks on the Shiv Sena administration’s civic record as such scrutiny would have invited uncomfortable comparisons with their own long years in charge.
They were precedents to the BMC disaster. In last year’s BEST Workers’ Credit Society election, the combined Thackeray brand failed to win a single seat. It only showed that grassroots machinery, once the Bal Thackeray-led undivided Shiv Sena’s great strength, had visibly rusted. The BMC results are a mere confirmation of a long decline in the Sena and the MNS headed by Uddhav and Raj Thackeray respectively in form of drifting cadres, thinning networks and faltering street-level mobilisation.
The results prove that in modern Mumbai, pride without performance is no longer sufficient. The city’s electorate is more fragmented, more transactional and more impatient than the Thackeray cousins appear to have grasped.
With an annual budget exceeding Rs. 74,000 crore, the BMC is not merely a civic body but a financial colossus. Losing it deprives the Thackerays’ of their last major institutional foothold.
The BJP, for its part, fought with a discipline the Thackerays’ could neither match nor counter. Its campaign in Mumbai was notable as much for who stayed away. The party carefully kept its North Indian heavyweights out of the campaigning, effortlessly stripping the Thackeray cousins identity-heavy rhetoric of the intrusive North Indian and deflating their ‘Marathi Manoos’ plank.
The deeper problem for the Thackeray cousins is strategic. Uddhav Thackeray remains cautious to the point of inertia; Raj Thackeray’s trademark flamboyance has reduced to the level of political vaudeville. Together, they offer neither administrative credibility nor ideological renewal.
Dynasties decay when they mistake inheritance for entitlement. For the Thackerays’, the BMC was once a birthright. ‘Maximum City’s’ voters have proved them otherwise.



Comments