top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 9:59:04 pm

Hidden Questions

For six years, the Disha Salian case has remained trapped in a fog of unanswered questions, disputed narratives and institutional inaction. It appears that the fog is now finally beginning to lift. The CBI’s recent FIR has brought into the investigation a startling array of names including Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and MLA Aaditya Thackeray, his father, Sena (UBT) chief and former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi, Rhea Chakraborty, Sachin Vaze, Param Bir Singh, and...

Hidden Questions

For six years, the Disha Salian case has remained trapped in a fog of unanswered questions, disputed narratives and institutional inaction. It appears that the fog is now finally beginning to lift. The CBI’s recent FIR has brought into the investigation a startling array of names including Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and MLA Aaditya Thackeray, his father, Sena (UBT) chief and former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi, Rhea Chakraborty, Sachin Vaze, Param Bir Singh, and former home minister Anil Deshmukh. The allegations being investigated include conspiracy, destruction or suppression of evidence and an alleged attempt to establish a false narrative around Salian’s death. For Aaditya and the MVA, the instinctive political response will be to dub the CBI’s fresh probe as ‘vendetta’ and portray the investigation as an assault on the Thackeray family. But such a response would evade the much larger question of why this case was allowed to remain where it was for so long? At the very least, the filing of the FIR against the Thackerays’ and others lays bare the failure on part of the erstwhile MVA government headed by Uddhav Thackeray to properly investigate the case. This aspect cannot be wished away now by invoking political persecution as the Bombay High Court’s intervention has itself exposed the extraordinary manner in which the matter was handled. For years, Salian’s death remained an accidental-death case rather than being subjected to the kind of criminal investigation demanded by the allegations surrounding it. Her family has repeatedly sought a CBI probe only to be rebuffed by the previous Maharashtra government headed by Uddhav Thackeray. If the Thackeray-led MVA government had nothing to fear, why was a transparent investigation not pursued with greater urgency? If there was no attempt to protect anyone, why were questions about the circumstances of Salian’s death allowed to accumulate rather than being conclusively answered? And if there was no political sensitivity involved, why did the machinery of government appear so reluctant to let an independent agency examine the matter? The more aggressively the Opposition cries “vendetta,” the more obvious another question becomes: what exactly is it afraid the investigation might uncover? Aaditya Thackeray’s political inheritance cannot become an institutional exemption. Being Balasaheb Thackeray’s grandson may provide a formidable political surname; it cannot provide immunity from scrutiny. The CBI must be allowed to pursue every lead, examine every witness, reconstruct every missing link and establish the truth as to what happened to Disha Salian. If the allegations against anyone are false, the investigation should establish that too. But if wrongdoing has occurred, then those responsible must face the consequences. After six years, neither political power nor a famous surname can be allowed to stand between the investigation and the truth.

Thackerays try to encash youth’s sentiments

Writer: Ruddhi Phadke
Ruddhi Phadke
Jul 26
4 min read

Succeed in pulling crowd that celebrated Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation with sharp political messaging

Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray came together for the third time in five days at a joint rally at Mumbai’s iconic Shivaji Park on Sunday to celebrate a ‘victory’ they were not part of. They addressed a rally as a celebration of the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan a day earlier.


Addressing the massive turnout, Uddhav Thackeray said the student-led agitation had proved that the voice of the people could not be silenced. Calling Pradhan’s resignation a moral triumph for students, he said those who demanded accountability for the alleged examination irregularities had achieved a significant victory. He said the campaign had laid the foundation for a wider fight against the BJP-led Central government. Uddhav said, “This fight is a united fight which is BJP vs India. A cockroach has defeated dictatorship. This is the real avatar of lord Vishnu. Modi ji can steal votes but not youngsters.”

 

Raj also lauded the students for their determination and perseverance throughout the agitation. He urged the youth to remain aware and actively engaged on issues related to education and governance. He said the success of students' protest proved Gen Z can challenge the government.

He thanked the Mumbai Police for maintaining order during the programme and said the country had seen "the difference between the Maharashtra Police and the Delhi Police," a reference to the thrashing of protesters in the national capital.

 

Spirited Speeches

The rally featured spirited speeches, slogans and enthusiastic participation by supporters of both parties, particularly young workers. A strong police presence was maintained in and around Shivaji Park, with barricades, traffic diversions and other security measures put in place to regulate the large crowds and maintain public order.


The rally was also viewed as a major political display of unity by the Thackeray cousins, who used the platform to reaffirm their common position on matters concerning Maharashtra and the interests of students.


Sweets were being distributed, slogans were being raised, while many highlighted that one of the grievances of the protesters was also the alleged illegal arrests of the protesters and misbehavior with women protesters.

Crowd was dominated by young teenagers, many of whom were students and were present to enjoy the vibe of a demonstration lacking much deeper insight of the NEET paper leak issue or the larger issue. Minor Children who were as young as nine years old, also stood with slogans written on placards. They had memorized poems to present some thoughts their parents had fed them with, making full use of the platform as a medium to overcome stage fear.


‘Fight against illegal arrests’, say protestors
Several demonstrators, who were a part of the celebrations on Sunday, alleged that they were not against any party but they were against unconstitutional behavior. Alleging illegal arrests to suppress freedom of speech by the Mumbai police, several demonstrators claimed to have joined the fight at the point where they felt that voices were being suppressed, and criticism was not being taken seriously.

A 26-year-old Sharvari Bukane, a practicing advocate at the Bombay High court, was also a part of the celebration. Bukane told ‘The Perfect Voice’ that she had been voluntarily active in expediting smooth release of students who were illegally being detained. “We are not against a person or any party. The nation is in the right hands. I was just doing my part. I am a part of Gen-Z. We will fight against any party or person who does something that is unconstitutional,” she said.

A Member of All India Student Federation Amir alleged that women protesters faced misbehavior and several people were illegally arrested. He said, “We will ensure NEET is abolished. Mahatma Gandhi has taught us nonviolence, Ambedkar taught us the path and Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj taught us determination. Youth is politically aware now. We want resignation from (Education minister) Dada Bhuse. Ambani and Adani are providing them money. Trump and Epstein files are by Modi’s side. We will continue to fight against capitalism, and privatisation.”

A 38-year-old working woman Anuja Bhate said, “Today the common man fears expressing opinions on politics because there is a real fear of retribution. For our democracy to become stronger, this fear needs to be eliminated.”

 

'We want anybody but Modi!’
Rajendra Chavan, a 65-year-old Thane resident and a retired civil Engineer, also joined the celebration with his family and children. He said the youths are desperate for a change as the education system is in shambles. They have no jobs and hence they are ready to go for anyone except Modi.

He said, “Senior citizens are devotees of Modi. They benefited from the free government schools and smooth education in their time, and now they are Modi devotees. The irony is that their children are in US and Europe for better education. My generation is busy worshiping an individual. Indira Gandhi too was defeated in 1975. Anybody but Modi! is the sentiment right now. It will take time, and it should happen democratically.”

"The dictator has been shaken. This is the power of the youth. They need not be told to do anything. They know what they want. The response of Mumbai has been tremendous. Asking questions to the government is not being anti-India. All FIRs against protesters should be withdrawn. The countdown has begun for this government.”

Aaditya Thackeray, MLA, Shiv Sena (UBT)

 

 “Power and arrogance have to bow before people's power. The youth will now have to rise against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) and delimitation (referred to the proposed delimitation bill). The youth power led a peaceful struggle against the system unitedly.”

Rohit Pawar, MLA, NCP (SP)

 

“Sanjay Raut’s agenda is clear which is restoring and settling the careers of Aditya Thackeray and Amit Thackeray. Why is Sanjay Raut not being able to address the public here? He is being prevented from addressing the public so that Rahul Gandhi doesn’t take away the credit of the whole agitation. Raut’s agenda is clear. He has nothing to do with NEET aspirants or youth.”

Navnath Ban, Chief Spokesperson, BJP


“We are open to peaceful protests and voicing concerns lawfully. We are followers of democracy. However, many of these protesters are crossing lines, using obnoxious language and misusing freedom of expression. This is not healthy. Why are people shying away from a discussion in Parliament? That is the place where discussions can bring about a change in law.”

Aniket Nikam, Spokesperson, BJP

Comments

bottom of page