top of page

By:

Sumit Ranjan Das

21 August 2024 at 4:08:59 pm

EPFO’s Big Wage-Band Reset

Twelve years is a long time for a wage ceiling to remain unchanged. The last revision came in September 2014, when the limit was raised from Rs.6,500 to Rs.15,000. Last week, the Union Cabinet approved another increase, taking the ceiling to Rs.25,000 a month with effect from 17 September 2026. The government’s estimate is that more than 51 lakh additional employees will come within mandatory EPFO coverage as a result of the change. For employers and payroll professionals, however, the...

EPFO’s Big Wage-Band Reset

Twelve years is a long time for a wage ceiling to remain unchanged. The last revision came in September 2014, when the limit was raised from Rs.6,500 to Rs.15,000. Last week, the Union Cabinet approved another increase, taking the ceiling to Rs.25,000 a month with effect from 17 September 2026. The government’s estimate is that more than 51 lakh additional employees will come within mandatory EPFO coverage as a result of the change. For employers and payroll professionals, however, the headline number is only the starting point. The more important questions are who will be covered, which wages will be taken into account and how the revised provisions will be implemented. Wage Ceiling The existing wage ceiling of Rs.15,000 a month is being raised by Rs.10,000, or 66.7 percent, to Rs.25,000. The change takes effect from 17 September 2026 and marks the first revision since September 2014. The government expects more than 51 lakh additional employees to be covered. Estimated expenditure is about Rs.56,696 crore over five years, while annual government outgo is expected to rise to approximately Rs.11,339 crore. The standard contribution remains 12 percent each from the employee and employer, subject to applicable provisions. The Cabinet said the decision will expand access to provident-fund savings, pension protection under the Employees’ Pension Scheme (EPS) and insurance protection under the Employees’ Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme (EDLI), in accordance with the applicable scheme provisions. The wage ceiling is not merely an administrative threshold. It determines the point at which mandatory EPF coverage applies under the existing framework. At present, a fresh employee joining employment at wages above Rs.15,000 a month is not automatically brought within mandatory EPF coverage and may remain outside mandatory provident-fund, pension and associated insurance protection, subject to applicable statutory provisions. The revised ceiling will bring a substantial section of employees earning between Rs.15,000 and Rs.25,000 within the mandatory coverage framework. The government has also quantified the fiscal impact. The estimated expenditure is about Rs.56,696 crore over five years, while annual government outgo is expected to rise to approximately Rs.11,339 crore, compared with existing annual budgetary support of about Rs.10,250 crore. The Labour Ministry has linked the revision to sustained wage growth, rising incomes and the continued expansion of formal employment since the previous revision in 2014. Payroll Illustration Consider an employee earning Rs.22,000 a month who becomes subject to mandatory coverage under the revised ceiling. At the standard 12 percent contribution rate, if the full eligible wage is used as the contribution base, the employee’s contribution would rise from Rs.1,800 to Rs.2,640 a month, while the employer’s contribution would similarly rise from Rs.1,800 to Rs.2,640. Total monthly contributions would therefore increase from Rs.3,600 to Rs.5,280 — a combined increase of Rs.1,680. However, this should not be treated simply as Rs.1,680 of additional employee savings. Contributions are allocated between EPF and EPS components as prescribed, with the EPF component accumulating in the employee’s account and the EPS component providing pension benefits subject to scheme conditions. The Rs.22,000 example is illustrative, not a universal payroll formula. The final treatment of wage components, existing employees in this band, EPS allocation and transitional matters will depend on the statutory notification and EPFO implementation instructions. For payroll professionals, the immediate task is to assess the operational impact. Key questions include the effective date for existing employees and new joiners, which wage components will count towards PF, whether the 10 percent concessional rate for notified establishments will continue, how the revised ceiling will interact with EPS pensionable wages, and what changes will be required in payroll systems. The Cabinet approval establishes the policy decision; the formal Gazette notification and EPFO instructions will determine how it is translated into payroll processes. The revised ceiling is the first increase since September 2014 and is expected to bring more than 51 lakh additional employees, particularly those in the Rs.15,000-Rs.25,000 wage band, under mandatory EPFO coverage. For them, the change can expand access to provident-fund savings, EPS pension and EDLI insurance, subject to scheme provisions. For employers, it means reviewing payroll costs, employee data, eligible wage components, contribution calculations and compliance systems. The government has described the move as part of efforts to extend statutory social security and strengthen formal employment. The policy has been announced. For payroll professionals, the next chapter is implementation. (The writer is a Cost and Management Accountant and founder of TaxoDas. Views personal

The Cost Beneath the Cloud

Jul 22
4 min read

A boomtown data center economy is rising across five Indian states with no cap on the water it draws or the coal it burns to stay cool.

In Tusiana, a village of about two thousand people in Uttar Pradesh’s Gautam Buddha Nagar district, the road suddenly changes. For a while, it is wide and newly paved, surrounded by high walls, barbed wire, and police barricades, with a substation humming behind the fence. This marks the edge of the Yotta Data Center Park, which Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and Rajeev Chandrasekhar, then India's junior minister for electronics and IT, opened in 2022. Just a kilometer further, the pavement falls apart, open drains line the street, and wells that once reached water at twenty or thirty feet now have to go down to eighty.


Uttar Pradesh signed the deal with Yotta for roughly 39,000 crore rupees, about 4.4 billion dollars, to build five more data centers on the same model over the next several years. The state’s data center policy promises round-the-clock water to the companies that build there, but it sets no limit on how much groundwater they can draw and no requirement that they report it. Yotta has told reporters it has dug no borewells for construction or operations. District officials, asked how much water the park and its neighbours actually pull from the ground, have said they do not know. The state’s agreement guarantees Yotta a fast-tracked build-out. It guarantees Tusiana nothing but the cost of digging deeper.


High Water Stress

Tusiana is not an outlier. It is the leading edge of a pattern. Three-quarters of India’s roughly 280 data centers sit in just five states, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh, according to mapping by the World Resources Institute’s India office, and more than half of all facilities nationwide are built in regions already classified as water stressed, among them Chennai, which nearly ran its reservoirs dry in 2019 and is now one of the country’s established data center hubs. S&P Global estimates that sixty to eighty percent of Indian data centers will face high water stress before this decade is out. That is a hard number to square with India's underlying math: the country holds close to a fifth of the world’s population and, per the World Bank, only about four percent of its renewable water.


The situation with electricity is just as difficult. In May, India’s power grid broke its own peak demand record for four days in a row, reaching nearly 271 gigawatts as an early heat wave pushed temperatures above 47 degrees Celsius in parts of Uttar Pradesh. The power ministry asked people to save electricity. Chennai, one of the main data center states, had nightly power cuts during this time. To meet demand, coal provided about 62 percent of the power at the peak, while solar gave 22 percent and wind and hydro each supplied 5 percent. Over the whole year, coal's share is even higher, close to three-quarters.


The same tensions are already visible elsewhere. In Memphis, Elon Musk’s xAI, now part of SpaceX, has run dozens of gas turbines for more than a year to power its Colossus data center without the Clean Air Act permits the law requires. The turbines sit in neighbourhoods that are majority Black. The NAACP sued in April.


Last month, the Trump administration’s Justice Department intervened on xAI’s side, arguing that enforcement would endanger national security. Whatever the court eventually decides, the episode shows that political power can override a working legal mechanism for accountability, even in a country that has one. India’s data center industry is younger than America’s. It still has room to build accountability from the start.


Legal Requirements

India does have some regulations on paper. Large data centers must go through state-level environmental reviews before construction. However, a 2026 analysis by the Council on Energy, Environment and Water found that out of fifteen states with data center policies, most do not set efficiency standards, limits on water use per megawatt, or require public reporting. For example, when Andhra Pradesh approved a one-gigawatt park at Tarluvada, in the district with the state’s lowest groundwater reserves, the approval documents did not say how much water the project would use.


This is not an argument against the data center industry itself. India wants this growth, and the tax holiday extended through 2047 in this year’s budget is designed to attract large investments from places like Southeast Asia and the Gulf. There is already a better example within India: Meta’s new campus with Reliance in Jamnagar plans to use renewable power and cool its servers with desalinated seawater instead of groundwater, because someone asked the right questions before building. Asking these questions should be a legal requirement, not just a courtesy. Every data center above a modest size (five megawatts is a reasonable limit) should have to publicly report its water and electricity use every quarter, using standard metrics like water usage effectiveness and power usage effectiveness. This reporting should be required for environmental clearance and for getting the tax holiday and state incentives, not just included in a sustainability report that few people read.


Back in Tusiana, the substation keeps humming, and the park is only one data center into a planned six. Five more are coming, on the same aquifer, under rules that still do not require anyone to say how much they take. India’s next technology revolution should not come at the cost of its aquifers. The rules governing this industry must be written before the country's water runs out.


 

(The writer is an ICSSR Fellow at Govind Ballabh Pant Social Science Institute where his work focuses on environment, climate, political ecology, public policy and governance. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page