top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi...

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) partners, the Nationalist Congress Party (SP) and Shiv Sena (UBT). According to Congress insiders, the move is the outcome of more than a year of intense internal consultations following the party’ dismal performance in the 2024 Assembly elections, belying huge expectations. A broad consensus reportedly emerged that the party should chart a “lone-wolf” course to safeguard the core ideals of Congress, turning140-years-old, next month. State and Mumbai-level Congress leaders, speaking off the record, said that although the party gained momentum in the 2019 Assembly and 2024 Lok Sabha elections, it was frequently constrained by alliance compulsions. Several MVA partners, they claimed, remained unyielding on larger ideological and political issues. “The Congress had to compromise repeatedly and soften its position, but endured it as part of ‘alliance dharma’. Others did not reciprocate in the same spirit. They made unilateral announcements and declared candidates or policies without consensus,” a senior state leader remarked. Avoid liabilities He added that some alliance-backed candidates later proved to be liabilities. Many either lost narrowly or, even after winning with the support of Congress workers, defected to Mahayuti constituents - the Bharatiya Janata Party, Shiv Sena, or the Nationalist Congress Party. “More than five dozen such desertions have taken place so far, which is unethical, backstabbing the voters and a waste of all our efforts,” he rued. A Mumbai office-bearer elaborated that in certain constituencies, Congress workers effectively propelled weak allied candidates through the campaign. “Our assessment is that post-split, some partners have alienated their grassroots base, especially in the mofussil regions. They increasingly rely on Congress workers. This is causing disillusionment among our cadre, who see deserving leaders being sidelined and organisational growth stagnating,” he said. Chennithala’s declaration on Saturday was unambiguous: “We will contest all 227 seats independently in the BMC polls. This is the demand of our leaders and workers - to go alone in the civic elections.” Gaikwad added that the Congress is a “cultured and respectable party” that cannot ally with just anyone—a subtle reference to the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), which had earlier targeted North Indians and other communities and is now bidding for an electoral arrangement with the SS(UBT). Both state and city leaders reiterated that barring the BMC elections - where the Congress will take the ‘ekla chalo’ route - the MVA alliance remains intact. This is despite the sharp criticism recently levelled at the Congress by senior SS(UBT) leader Ambadas Danve following the Bihar results. “We are confident that secular-minded voters will support the Congress' fight against the BJP-RSS in local body elections. We welcome backing from like-minded parties and hope to finalize understandings with some soon,” a state functionary hinted. Meanwhile, Chennithala’s firm stance has triggered speculation in political circles about whether the Congress’ informal ‘black-sheep' policy vis-a-vis certain parties will extend beyond the BMC polls.

The Culture Mirage: When Warmth Hides What Hurts

You don’t protect loyalty by freezing it in time. You protect it by giving it a future that still matters.


The Talent Mismatch: When Loyalty Outgrows Competence

ree

Every growing company faces this moment … when gratitude becomes governance.


The oldest face in the room

“She was here before anyone else,” Rohit said softly.

The words sounded like respect, but also like a defense.

Across the table, Meera didn’t respond. She knew what that meant.

Asha, the company’s first hire, had been the soul of The Workshop (our composite case study of The People Paradox series) once.

Back when it was three people, one client, and a shared dream.

She did everything: vendor calls, billing, design feedback, even morale duty.

Her energy was contagious. Her loyalty unquestionable.

But now, three years later, the company had fifty people.Departments, systems, managers.And Asha, still just as loyal, was quietly becoming irrelevant.

No one said it aloud, but everyone felt it … the growing mismatch between what she meant and what the company now needed.


When loyalty turns into debt

Every founder meets this crossroad.

The faces that carried you through chaos now struggle to navigate structure.

They haven’t failed; the company simply changed shape faster than they did.

Rohit knew it too.

But gratitude is a heavy currency. Every time he thought of moving Asha aside, he felt like he was betraying history.

Behavioral economists call it sunk cost bias which is the tendency to keep investing in what we’ve already paid for, even when it no longer pays back.

In companies, that cost isn’t money. It’s memory. And so Rohit kept her close, gave her symbolic tasks, added her name to decisions she no longer drove.

It looked respectful. It felt kind. But slowly, it became expensive.

Projects slowed because people waited for her inputs out of habit.

New hires felt invisible.

And Meera, now a team lead, found herself caught between truth and tenderness.


Meera’s dilemma

Asha had once mentored Meera. Now, Meera was expected to manage her.

Every feedback conversation felt like betrayal. Every correction felt like disloyalty.

How do you tell someone who helped you grow that you’ve outgrown their way of working?

It was a strange kind of burnout… emotional, not operational.

The guilt of wanting progress without hurting anyone.

One evening, after another strained review, Meera told Rohit quietly,

“We keep saying we’re a family. But families don’t demote each other.” Rohit looked away. “That’s the problem,” he said. “We’re not a family anymore. We’re a company pretending to be one.”

That was the first honest sentence either of them had said in weeks.


Emotional economy of growth

Loyalty is emotional capital.

In the early days, it powers everything… speed, trust, belief.

But like any currency, it loses value if not reinvested into competence.

When a company scales, it trades on precision, not proximity.

It needs structure, not sentiment. And yet, most leaders delay that shift because they mistake gratitude for obligation.

That’s how the Talent Mismatch forms … quietly, under the weight of good intentions.

No one wants to fire the person who built the foundation. No one wants to admit that loyalty and relevance can drift apart. So, they stay polite.

And the system slows down, one kind gesture at a time.


Moment of truth

The reckoning came one Friday evening. The project deadline had slipped again.

Asha had promised an update that never came.

When Meera finally confronted her, Asha broke down. “I feel like I don’t belong here anymore,” she said. “I still love this place. But I don’t understand it.”

And in that confession lay the truth both sides had been avoiding. It wasn’t about competence or loyalty. It was about meaning.

Asha didn’t want power. She wanted purpose. Rohit didn’t need her old role, rather he needed her story to remain part of the company’s DNA. So they redefined her place: heritage, mentorship, training the next generation.

A new meaning without old weight.

That’s how you preserve loyalty: not by freezing it in time, but by giving it a future that still matters.


The quiet art of leadership

Growth doesn’t betray loyalty. It tests it. It asks whether we can love people without making them permanent.


Leadership, in the end, is this: to love people enough to evolve beyond them, and to respect them enough to let them do the same.


(The writer is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. He writes about the human mechanics of growth where systems evolve, and emotions learn to keep up. Views personal. Write to rahul@ppsconsulting.biz)

Comments


bottom of page