top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

The Culture Mirage: When Warmth Hides What Hurts

You don’t protect loyalty by freezing it in time. You protect it by giving it a future that still matters.


The Talent Mismatch: When Loyalty Outgrows Competence

Every growing company faces this moment … when gratitude becomes governance.


The oldest face in the room

“She was here before anyone else,” Rohit said softly.

The words sounded like respect, but also like a defense.

Across the table, Meera didn’t respond. She knew what that meant.

Asha, the company’s first hire, had been the soul of The Workshop (our composite case study of The People Paradox series) once.

Back when it was three people, one client, and a shared dream.

She did everything: vendor calls, billing, design feedback, even morale duty.

Her energy was contagious. Her loyalty unquestionable.

But now, three years later, the company had fifty people.Departments, systems, managers.And Asha, still just as loyal, was quietly becoming irrelevant.

No one said it aloud, but everyone felt it … the growing mismatch between what she meant and what the company now needed.


When loyalty turns into debt

Every founder meets this crossroad.

The faces that carried you through chaos now struggle to navigate structure.

They haven’t failed; the company simply changed shape faster than they did.

Rohit knew it too.

But gratitude is a heavy currency. Every time he thought of moving Asha aside, he felt like he was betraying history.

Behavioral economists call it sunk cost bias which is the tendency to keep investing in what we’ve already paid for, even when it no longer pays back.

In companies, that cost isn’t money. It’s memory. And so Rohit kept her close, gave her symbolic tasks, added her name to decisions she no longer drove.

It looked respectful. It felt kind. But slowly, it became expensive.

Projects slowed because people waited for her inputs out of habit.

New hires felt invisible.

And Meera, now a team lead, found herself caught between truth and tenderness.


Meera’s dilemma

Asha had once mentored Meera. Now, Meera was expected to manage her.

Every feedback conversation felt like betrayal. Every correction felt like disloyalty.

How do you tell someone who helped you grow that you’ve outgrown their way of working?

It was a strange kind of burnout… emotional, not operational.

The guilt of wanting progress without hurting anyone.

One evening, after another strained review, Meera told Rohit quietly,

“We keep saying we’re a family. But families don’t demote each other.” Rohit looked away. “That’s the problem,” he said. “We’re not a family anymore. We’re a company pretending to be one.”

That was the first honest sentence either of them had said in weeks.


Emotional economy of growth

Loyalty is emotional capital.

In the early days, it powers everything… speed, trust, belief.

But like any currency, it loses value if not reinvested into competence.

When a company scales, it trades on precision, not proximity.

It needs structure, not sentiment. And yet, most leaders delay that shift because they mistake gratitude for obligation.

That’s how the Talent Mismatch forms … quietly, under the weight of good intentions.

No one wants to fire the person who built the foundation. No one wants to admit that loyalty and relevance can drift apart. So, they stay polite.

And the system slows down, one kind gesture at a time.


Moment of truth

The reckoning came one Friday evening. The project deadline had slipped again.

Asha had promised an update that never came.

When Meera finally confronted her, Asha broke down. “I feel like I don’t belong here anymore,” she said. “I still love this place. But I don’t understand it.”

And in that confession lay the truth both sides had been avoiding. It wasn’t about competence or loyalty. It was about meaning.

Asha didn’t want power. She wanted purpose. Rohit didn’t need her old role, rather he needed her story to remain part of the company’s DNA. So they redefined her place: heritage, mentorship, training the next generation.

A new meaning without old weight.

That’s how you preserve loyalty: not by freezing it in time, but by giving it a future that still matters.


The quiet art of leadership

Growth doesn’t betray loyalty. It tests it. It asks whether we can love people without making them permanent.


Leadership, in the end, is this: to love people enough to evolve beyond them, and to respect them enough to let them do the same.


(The writer is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. He writes about the human mechanics of growth where systems evolve, and emotions learn to keep up. Views personal. Write to rahul@ppsconsulting.biz)

Comments


bottom of page