top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 4:59:11 pm

Fadnavis seeks judicial probe against chiefs

AI Generated Image Mumbai: Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, on Monday, requested Governor Jishnu Dev Verma to constitute a committee to investigate the current and former chairpersons of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) over an exam paper leak by invoking Article 317 of the Constitution, even as opposition MLA Rohit Pawar issued a two-day ultimatum to the state government, warning that the protesting MPSC aspirants will either shut down Pune city or storm the Mantralaya if...

Fadnavis seeks judicial probe against chiefs

AI Generated Image Mumbai: Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, on Monday, requested Governor Jishnu Dev Verma to constitute a committee to investigate the current and former chairpersons of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) over an exam paper leak by invoking Article 317 of the Constitution, even as opposition MLA Rohit Pawar issued a two-day ultimatum to the state government, warning that the protesting MPSC aspirants will either shut down Pune city or storm the Mantralaya if the commission’s leadership is not held accountable. The chief minister’s recommendation to the Governor follows a high-level meeting with a delegation of students preparing for competitive exams. Responding to their primary demand for the immediate removal of MPSC Chairman Vivek Bhimanwar, the government clarified that a constitutional inquiry is legally mandated before any dismissal. Consequently, Fadnavis has urged the Governor to appoint a retired High Court judge to head the probe committee, requesting a report within three months to facilitate further administrative action. Honoring another commitment made during the meeting, the state government issued orders transferring MPSC Secretary Mahendra Harpalkar from his post. The current unrest stems from the leaked Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug inspector examination paper, a breach that recently led to the arrest of several accused individuals and three beneficiary students. However, the state government’s actions have failed to quell the agitation in Pune, which has now entered its fifth day and fractured into three distinct groups over varying demands, including disputes over descriptive versus objective exam patterns. The protest site has rapidly transformed into a political flashpoint, drawing visits from prominent leaders across the spectrum, including Sharad Pawar, Raj Thackeray, Aaditya Thackeray, and Manoj Jarange Patil. Taking an aggressive stance on the ground, NCP (SP) MLA Rohit Pawar cautioned the administration that a massive escalation is imminent. Anticipating a potential visit by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on October 7 or 8, Pawar estimated that over one lakh students could soon take to the streets. He stated that the students and their parents will heed calls to lock down Pune entirely or march directly to the state secretariat in Mumbai if the government fails to clean up the alleged corruption within the MPSC. The escalating standoff also triggered a direct political exchange between Pawar and Minister Nitesh Rane. Rane urged Pawar not to hold students hostage for political optics, emphasizing that the issue concerns the future of the youth and should not be used as a political launchpad. Rane sarcastically extended an olive branch, stating that as friends, they might even work together as cabinet ministers in the future. Pawar quickly dismissed the overture, retorting that Rane should focus on demanding Bhimanwar’s resignation from his own government rather than predicting future alliances. Pawar quipped that the BJP’s sudden collaborative tone indicates they have realized a change in government is imminent, urging Rane to show the courage to sit in the opposition. Meanwhile, the ruling BJP launched a fierce counter-offensive, categorizing the Pune protests as a staged political event rather than a genuine student movement. Addressing a press conference at the BJP state office, chief spokesperson Navnath Ban alleged that 80 percent of the crowd consists of political workers. Ban claimed that after genuine students boycotted the initial days of the protest, Pawar orchestrated the arrival of employees from Baramati Agro and local sugar factories in 200 to 250 vehicles bearing political flags. Defending the MPSC chairman, Ban pointed out that the paper leak did not even occur during Bhimanwar’s tenure as he took charge in March 2026 and noted that the student delegation that met with Fadnavis in Mumbai had already expressed satisfaction with the government’s intervention. To bolster his claim of political infiltration, the BJP spokesperson cited a recent incident where Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Omraje Nimbalkar was met with hostile “traitor” slogans at the protest site, arguing this proved the crowd consisted of partisan workers rather than competitive exam aspirants seeking academic reforms.

The Funding Gap in India's Fight Against Tobacco

Jun 2
3 min read

India earns over Rs 73,000 crore annually from tobacco taxes, yet dedicated spending on tobacco control remains a fraction of that.

On World No Tobacco Day, observed on May 31, governments worldwide renew their commitment to combating tobacco use. This year’s WHO theme, “Unmasking the Appeal — Countering Nicotine and Tobacco Addiction", highlights industry tactics that attract young users.


In India, this occasion also offers an opportunity to reflect on the complex balance between tobacco tax revenues and investments in tobacco control.


Every year on May 31, the global community focuses on reducing tobacco-related harm. While the tobacco industry’s marketing strategies deserve scrutiny, India faces its own policy challenge: substantial revenue from tobacco products alongside the need for stronger prevention and cessation efforts.


According to official figures, taxes from tobacco products (including GST, excise duty, cess and other levies) contributed around 2.2 per cent of India’s gross tax revenue in 2023-24. In recent years, annual collections have hovered near or above Rs 73,000-76,000 crore.


This revenue supports various public programmes, yet it also underscores a longstanding policy paradox. The National Tobacco Control Programme (NTCP), the Centre’s flagship initiative for tobacco cessation and enforcement, receives relatively modest funding. Analyses, including from the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), indicate annual allocations often remain below Rs 50 crore — a small fraction of the revenue generated. While taxation itself serves as a tool to discourage consumption by raising prices, the gap in dedicated spending on enforcement, awareness and cessation services merits attention.


Grassroots Enforcement

While the national picture shows a funding gap, the challenges of grassroots enforcement become evident through recent state-level decisions, such as those in Maharashtra.


A recent example illustrates this challenge. On May 22, 2026, Maharashtra’s Public Health Department issued a government resolution providing Rs 2,000 per taluka annually to taluka-level coordination and monitoring committees. Formed in 2023 under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), these committees aim to strengthen enforcement at the local level.


Maharashtra has approximately 358 talukas. The total allocation for these committees thus comes to around Rs 7.16 lakh per year. While the intent behind creating taluka-level bodies is commendable — bringing enforcement closer to villages and towns — the modest financial support highlights the resource constraints faced by such initiatives. The committees are expected to handle awareness, monitoring and enforcement tasks, often by integrating with existing meetings of the Taluka De-addiction Committee under the Social Justice Department.


Broader Picture

This situation is not unique to Maharashtra. Nationally, data from 2015-16 to 2022-23 shows that only about 38 per cent of approved NTCP funds were utilised. Factors include limited staffing, training gaps and infrastructure challenges at district and sub-district levels.


Maharashtra has achieved notable success in reducing cigarette consumption and ranks high on certain tobacco-control indicators, yet utilisation of NTCP funds has historically been modest.


According to the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS-2, 2016-17), around 267 million adults (28.6 per cent prevalence) use tobacco in some form. Although prevalence has declined since the previous survey, the absolute numbers remain significant, calling for sustained, well-resourced efforts.


The World Health Organization recommends that taxes should constitute at least 75 per cent of the retail price of tobacco products. In India, the tax incidence on cigarettes is approximately 53 per cent, as noted by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in Parliament.


Recent policy changes, including the Central Excise (Amendment) Bill, 2025, aim to maintain revenue stability while adjusting duties. Public health experts have long suggested exploring earmarking a portion of tobacco taxes specifically for control programmes, cessation centres and school-based awareness drives.


Way Forward

On World No Tobacco Day 2026, India will reiterate its commitment to a tobacco-free future. Symbolic observances are important, but lasting progress depends on strengthening implementation machinery.


Enhancing utilisation of available funds, building capacity at the taluka and district levels, and ensuring better coordination between health and revenue departments could help bridge existing gaps. The Rs 2,000 per taluka allocation, while limited, represents a step towards decentralised action. With additional support through training, monitoring mechanisms and integration with broader non-communicable disease programmes, these committees could become more effective. Many states, including Maharashtra, have demonstrated that focused efforts can yield results in reducing consumption.


Tobacco control involves multiple dimensions: taxation, enforcement, awareness and support for cessation. Aligning fiscal policy more closely with public health goals remains an ongoing policy challenge. A balanced approach that sustains revenue while progressively investing in prevention and de-addiction could better serve both economic and health objectives.


(The writer is a senior journalist. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page