top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several...

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several questions. While replying to one of the questions, he remarked, “If Swatantraveer Savarkar is given the Bharat Ratna, the prestige of the Bharat Ratna itself will increase.” He was asked, why there has been a delay in conferring the Bharat Ratna on Savarkar, in reply to which, Bhagwat said, “I am not part of that committee. But if I meet someone, I will ask. Even without that honour, he rules the hearts of millions of people.” he added. Social Divisions Bhagwat replied to questions that were clubbed in 14 different groups ranging from national security to environment, social harmony, youth, arts and sports. Whenever the questions suggested or expressed expectations that the RSS should do certain things, Bhagwat stressed on the involvement of the society and initiative from the society in resolving the problems. While addressing the critical issue of Uniform Civil Code, Bhagwat stated that the UCC should be framed by taking everyone into confidence and must not lead to social divisions. In the same way while replying to the question related to illegal migrants in the country, Bhagwat urged people to “detect and report” the “illegal infiltrators” to the police. He also urged people not to give them any employment and to be more “vigilant.” Backing SIR He highlighted that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise has already revealed the “foreigners” living in the country. “The government has a lot to do regarding infiltration. They have to detect and deport. This wasn’t happening until now, but it has started little by little, and it will gradually increase. When the census or the SIR is conducted, many people come to light who are not citizens of this country; they are automatically excluded from the process,” he said. “But we can do one thing: we can work on detection. Their language gives them away. We should detect them and report them to the appropriate authorities. We should inform the police that we suspect these people are foreigners, and they should investigate and keep an eye on them, and we will also keep an eye on them. We will not give employment to any foreigner. If someone is from our country, we will give them employment, but not to foreigners. You should be a little more vigilant and aware,” he added. SC Chief Emphasising the inclusivity of the Sangh, he said that anyone can become ‘Sarsanghchalak’ (RSS chief), including the SC and STs, as the decision is solely dependent on the work that any individual put for the organisation. “Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra or Brahmin does not qualify for the Sarsanghchalak position (RSS Chief), a Hindu will become the one who works and is best available. A Hindu will become, and that can also be an SC or ST. Anyone can become it depends on the work. Today, if you see, all classes have representation in the Sangh. The decision is taken on the basis of one who works and is best available,” he said. He pointed out that when the RSS was founded, its work began in a Brahmin-dominated community and hence, most of its founders were Brahmins, which led to the organisation being labelled as a Brahmin outfit at the time. People always look for an organisation that has representatives from their community, he said. “If I were to choose a chief, I would go by the ‘best available candidate’ criterion. When I was appointed RSS chief, there were many best candidates, but they were not available. I was the one who could be relieved from duties and appointed,” he said. He said that to belong to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe communities is not a disqualification, and neither is being a Brahmin a qualification to become the RSS chief. Ready to step down if Sangh asks for Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday said the Sangh had asked him to continue working despite his age, while stressing that he would step down from the post whenever the organisation directs him to do so. “There is no election to the post of RSS chief. Regional and divisional heads appoint the chief. Generally, it is said that after turning 75, one should work without holding any post,” Bhagwat said. “I have completed 75 years and informed the RSS, but the organisation asked me to continue working. Whenever the RSS asks me to step down, I will do so, but retirement from work will never happen,” he said.

The Imported Dream Is Now ‘Made in India’

Updated: Feb 20, 2025

We grew up believing the West had everything. It turns out, so do we.

Made in India

As a child, I marvelled at the dazzling gadgets, exotic toys, and glossy chocolates that my NRI cousins brought home from their trips abroad. My house, a mere ten-minute drive from Mumbai’s Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, became an unofficial transit lounge for returning relatives. It didn’t matter if it was the crack of dawn or the dead of night for my family and I would pile into the car, eager to greet our foreign-returned kin. There was a romance to these homecomings, a blend of nostalgia and aspiration. Each arrival was a portal to a world more prosperous and more advanced. At least, that’s what I thought then.


Their gifts, small yet powerful symbols of a distant affluence, enthralled me. Ferrero Rocher and Lindt chocolates, exotic and unattainable, were unwrapped with reverence. Clothes that looked straight out of a glossy magazine, and later, the near-mythical laptops possessed by my teenage cousins at a time when I barely knew what a laptop was. The implicit message was clear: the United States, and the West by extension, was the land of better things, a place to aspire to. I never questioned this belief but merely absorbed it, as effortlessly as a sponge soaks up water.


But over the years, something changed. The gap between their world and mine began to shrink. When my NRI cousins visit now, our conversations no longer carry the undertone of disparity. We discuss the same gadgets, use the same brands, and browse the same online stores. The once-coveted Ferrero Rocher and Lindt chocolates, which felt so unattainable in my childhood, now sit casually in Indian supermarket aisles. Their presence no longer excites me, nor does it signify a connection to an inaccessible world. In fact, I later discovered that these chocolates were never even American to begin with.


My sense of awe for the West has been replaced by something else – an understanding that progress is not a one-way street. Many of my NRI friends now find themselves grappling with an unexpected reality that America isn’t quite the utopia we imagined. Take something as simple as online shopping. In India, an Amazon or Zomato delivery arrives at the doorstep. In the U.S., as my friends lament, delivery personnel often leave packages outside the main gate, sometimes even on the sidewalk. If you don’t retrieve them in time, they may well vanish, to be picked up by a passerby or, more commonly, a homeless person. A bizarre, dystopian inconvenience for a country that once set the gold standard for efficiency.


It isn’t just logistics. Public safety, too, presents unsettling paradoxes. When I visited New York in 2014, a friend warned me not to leave a laptop unattended in the car for it would almost certainly be stolen. To me, a lifelong Mumbaikar, this was alien. I had never felt such a tangible sense of vulnerability at home. In India, we routinely critique our country for petty crime, but in the U.S., grand larceny often feels like an accepted reality, an inevitability shrugged off. Stories from my NRI friends reinforce this: incidents of muggings, robberies, and street harassment in cities like San Francisco, London, and Paris are all too common. And yet, a deeply ingrained cultural narrative persists. India, we are often told, is dangerous, backward, ungovernable.


This skewed perception is partly our own doing. In Mumbai, heritage tour guides eagerly showcase Dharavi, the slum made famous by the popular novel and film Slumdog Millionaire, as a prime attraction, reinforcing a reductive, poverty-stricken image of India. Contrast this with how other nations curate their histories. Londoners don’t take pride in conducting tours of council estates; Americans don’t market Detroit’s economic decline as a must-see. Why, then, do we highlight our struggles rather than our triumphs? Why do we, with misplaced irony, conduct tours of the spot where the Indian Coast Guard failed to prevent Ajmal Kasab’s entry, instead of celebrating the bravery of Tukaram Ombale, who died capturing him?


The West, for all its pretensions of superiority, is not without its own hidden fractures. Consider France, where a woman named Giselle Pelicot was unknowingly subjected to a decade of sexual assault by multiple men, including her own husband. Or Britain’s infamous grooming gang scandals, where authorities turned a blind eye to systemic abuse for years. These incidents, horrifying as they are, don’t define these nations in the global consciousness the way singular acts of violence or governance failures define India.


The wildfires in California laid waste to thousands of homes, but the U.S. despite being the richest, most technologically advanced nation in the world was for endless time unable to contain them. Meanwhile, India orchestrates the Maha Kumbh with precision, managing crowds of over 150 million largely without chaos. A logistical marvel by any standard, yet rarely acknowledged as such.


The world is neither as lopsided nor as monochrome as we once believed. India’s place in the global order is no longer that of a starry-eyed aspirant but a formidable player. The ‘reverse gaze’ is well underway. Perhaps it is time we stop looking outward for validation and start recognizing our own worth on our own terms.

Comments


bottom of page