top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city...

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city will get a ‘Hindu Marathi’ person to head India’s richest civic body, while the Opposition Shiv Sena (UBT)-Maharashtra Navnirman Sena also harbour fond hopes of a miracle that could ensure their own person for the post. The Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) optimism stems from expectations of possible political permutations-combinations that could develop with a realignment of forces as the Supreme Court is hearing the cases involving the Shiv Sena-Nationalist Congress Party this week. Catapulted as the largest single party, the BJP hopes to install a first ever party-man as Mayor, but that may not create history. Way back in 1982-1983, a BJP leader Dr. Prabhakar Pai had served in the top post in Mumbai (then Bombay). Incidentally, Dr. Pai hailed from Udupi district of Karnataka, and his appointment came barely a couple of years after the BJP was formed (1980), capping a distinguished career as a city father, said experts. Originally a Congressman, Dr. Pai later shifted to the Bharatiya Janata Party, then back to Congress briefly, founded the Janata Seva Sangh before immersing himself in social activities. Second Administrator The 2026 Mayoral elections have evoked huge interest not only among Mumbaikars but across the country as it comes after nearly four years since the BMC was governed by an Administrator. This was only the second time in the BMC history that an Administrator was named after April 1984-May 1985. On both occasions, there were election-related issues, the first time the elections got delayed for certain reasons and the second time the polling was put off owing to Ward delimitations and OBC quotas as the matter was pending in the courts. From 1931 till 2022, Mumbai has been lorded over by 76 Mayors, men and women, hailing from various regions, backgrounds, castes and communities. They included Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Sikhs, even a Jew, etc., truly reflecting the cosmopolitan personality of the coastal city and India’s financial powerhouse. In 1931-1932, the Mayor was a Parsi, J. B. Boman Behram, and others from his community followed like Khurshed Framji Nariman (after whom Nariman Point is named), E. A. Bandukwala, Minoo Masani, B. N. Karanjia and other bigwigs. There were Muslims like Hoosenally Rahimtoola, Sultan M. Chinoy, the legendary Yusuf Meherally, Dr. A. U. Memon and others. The Christian community got a fair share of Mayors with Joseph A. D’Souza – who was Member of Constituent Assembly representing Bombay Province for writing-approving the Constitution of India, M. U. Mascarenhas, P. A. Dias, Simon C. Fernandes, J. Leon D’Souza, et al. A Jew Elijah Moses (1937-1938) and a Sikh M. H. Bedi (1983-1984), served as Mayors, but post-1985, for the past 40 years, nobody from any minority community occupied the august post. During the silver jubilee year of the post, Sulochana M. Modi became the first woman Mayor of Mumbai (1956), and later with tweaks in the rules, many women ruled in this post – Nirmala Samant-Prabhavalkar (1994-1995), Vishakha Raut (997-1998), Dr. Shubha Raul (March 2007-Nov. 2009), Shraddha Jadhav (Dec. 2009-March 2012), Snehal Ambedkar (Sep. 2014-March 2017). The last incumbent (before the Administrator) was a government nurse, Kishori Pednekar (Nov. 2019-March 2022) - who earned the sobriquet of ‘Florence Nightingale’ of Mumbai - as she flitted around in her full white uniform at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic, earning the admiration of the citizens. Mumbai Mayor – high-profile post The Mumbai Mayor’s post is considered a crucial step in the political ladder and many went on to become MLAs, MPs, state-central ministers, a Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief Ministers and union ministers. The formidable S. K. Patil was Mayor (1949-1952) and later served in the union cabinets of PMs Jawaharlal Nehru, Lah Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi; Dahyabhai V. Patel (1954-1955) was the son of India’s first Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel; Manohar Joshi (1976-1977) became the CM of Maharashtra, later union minister and Speaker of Lok Sabha; Chhagan Bhujbal (1985-1986 – 1990-1991) became a Deputy CM.

The Rising Tide: Rethinking India-Nepal Water Agreements Post 2024 Floods

India-Nepal Water

Nestled in the Himalayas, Nepal, is a home to the headwaters of several significant rivers that flow into India. The Mahakali and Koshi Rivers prove to be the lifelines for both India and Nepal. These rivers support agriculture, hydropower and livelihoods. However, managing these rivers has been a challenge due to uneven power dynamics, increasing climate change and natural disasters, mainly floods.


As the skies above Nepal unleashed their torrential wrath during the monsoon season in 2024, the ripple effects of these floods have surged far beyond its borders. As both India and Nepal grapple the turbulent waters of both the Mahakali and Koshi rivers, it adds new layers of complexity to an age-old challenge about the transboundary river management between the two nations.


The recent floods in September, cannot be ignored as they are a force of nature, reminding both India and Nepal that water is not just a resource to be divided but acts as a lifeline that is shaped by the ever-changing forces of nature. Further with the rising water levels, damaged infrastructure and altered river flow patterns, these floods have highlighted the fragility of transboundary river management systems within South Asia. The rising water levels, submerged farmlands and displaced communities. These floods have underscored the urgent need to revisit and reinforce Nepal’s long-standing water-sharing treaties with its southern neighbour.


The Koshi Agreement signed in 1954 and the Mahakali Treaty signed in 1996 were treaties designed to regulate the joint use of these two rivers in order to control floods, increase irrigation and generate hydropower. Yet, the 2024 floods have exposed the weaknesses within these agreements, as both the countries have struggled to manage the rivers in ways that equitably serve their needs.


The Mahakali Treaty, which intended to ensure the equitable sharing of the Mahakali River also known as the Sarda River in India. The treaty cantered around the Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project, a massive dam envisioned to generate hydropower and control floods. However, despite being signed over three decades, this project remains largely unimplemented and is greatly hampered due to political disagreements and technical challenges among the two nations.


As floodwaters surged along the Mahakali River, they inundated vast areas on both sides of the border, emphasising the urgent need for robust flood-control infrastructure. The absence of the long-delayed Pancheshwar dam has left communities vulnerable, prompting Nepalese officials to call for renewed efforts to realize the treaty’s promises.


Critics in Nepal have long voiced their concerns that the Mahakali Treaty favours India, with unequal sharing of the river’s resources and the delayed implementation of key projects like that of Pancheshwar. Now that the floodwaters recede, the Nepalese officials have intensified calls for urging both nations for a renewed focus on the treaty’s implementation, demanding that both nations work together to expedite the project and enhance flood control measures.


Another major concern between the two countries is the River Koshi, which is one of the largest tributaries of the Ganga (Ganges) River. The Koshi River has historically proven to flood the Indian state of Bihar.


The Koshi Agreement signed in 1954, allowed the construction of the Koshi Barrage in Nepal to control floods and provide irrigation to both countries. However, the 2024 floods have once again exposed the limitations of this arrangement. In the wake of the floods, criticism in Nepal regarding the agreement’s perceived inequities. The Koshi barrage, which is controlled by India, has failed to safeguard Nepal’s Terai region, where villages and farms were submerged under several feet of water during the recent deluge. Thus, with worsened flood risks in Nepal, leading to calls for a revaluation of the agreement. The issues of silt buildup in the river and insufficient maintenance of the barrage have compounded the problem, leading to increased flood risks in Nepal.


However, as communities recover, there are renewed calls for a revaluation of the Koshi Agreement to ensure that both nations’ interests are addressed more equitably.


The 2024 floods have reinforced the need for enhanced cooperation between Nepal and India in order to manage shared rivers more effectively. Beyond immediate flood mitigation efforts, both India and Nepal must not only address the immediate challenges of flood mitigation but also the long-term impacts of climate change, which is expected to bring more erratic and intense weather in the coming years.


The 2024 floods have highlighted the inadequacy of current water-sharing treaties between India and Nepal, which experts say no longer address the growing challenges of climate change. Joint river basin management could improve coordination on critical infrastructure projects like dams and barrages, helping both nations equitably share water and mitigate flood risks. For Nepal, this crisis presents an opportunity to renegotiate terms with India and push for a more balanced approach. As both countries recover, there is a growing understanding that water must be managed cooperatively, as a shared resource essential to their future.


(The author is an educationalist. Views personal)

Comments


bottom of page